Abstract
Synapses are highly dynamic and complex structures responsible for neuronal communication. The recent progresses in super-resolution imaging technologies unraveled an inherently complex nanorganization of synaptic components. At the single synapse level, nanodomains of key proteins of pre- and postsynaptic terminals are transcellularly aligned in nanocolumns, which turned out to have a significant impact on synaptic function. Perturbations of this dynamic organization might also be involved in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and intellectual disability. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the organization principles of synaptic connections and their dynamic regulation with nanometer precision. Here, we present a detailed protocol that enables to visualize endogenous synaptic proteins both in vitro and in vivo. This method combines the use of transcriptionally regulated fibronectin intrabodies generated with mRNA display (FingRs) against PSD95 and Gephyrin, two major scaffolding proteins of excitatory and inhibitory synapses, with in utero electroporation (IUE), confocal, and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. This approach may be considered as a method of choice to assess a number of morphometric parameters of synaptic connections up to their nanoscale organization. We believe that this strategy might help to progress our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying brain function and dysfunction.
Key words
- Synapse organization
- Super-resolution microscopy
- Nanodomains
- FingR
- In utero electroporation
- Postsynaptic density
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Choquet D, Triller A (2013) The dynamic synapse. Neuron 80:691–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.013
Schikorski T, Stevens CF (1997) Quantitative ultrastructural analysis of hippocampal excitatory synapses. J Neurosci 17:5858–5867. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-15-05858.1997
Burette AC, Lesperance T, Crum J et al (2012) Electron tomographic analysis of synaptic ultrastructure. J Comp Neurol 520:2697–2711. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23067
Zieger HL, Choquet D (2021) Nanoscale synapse organization and dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurobiol Dis 158:105453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105453
Choquet D, Sainlos M, Sibarita J-B (2021) Advanced imaging and labelling methods to decipher brain cell organization and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 22:237–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00441-z
Yang X, Annaert W (2021) The nanoscopic organization of synapse structures: a common basis for cell communication. Membranes (Basel) 11:248. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11040248
Heller JP, Rusakov DA (2017) The nanoworld of the tripartite synapse: insights from super-resolution microscopy. Front Cell Neurosci 11:374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00374
Choquet D, Hosy E (2020) AMPA receptor nanoscale dynamic organization and synaptic plasticities. Curr Opin Neurobiol 63:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.04.003
Choquet D (2018) Linking nanoscale dynamics of AMPA receptor organization to plasticity of excitatory synapses and learning. J Neurosci 38:9318–9329. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2119-18.2018
Goncalves J, Bartol TM, Camus C et al (2020) Nanoscale co-organization and coactivation of AMPAR, NMDAR, and mGluR at excitatory synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:14503–14511. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922563117
Orré T, Joly A, Karatas Z et al (2021) Molecular motion and tridimensional nanoscale localization of kindlin control integrin activation in focal adhesions. Nat Commun 12:3104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23372-w
Pizzarelli R, Griguoli M, Zacchi P et al (2020) Tuning GABAergic inhibition: gephyrin molecular organization and functions. Neuroscience 439:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.036
Tang A-H, Chen H, Li TP et al (2016) A trans-synaptic nanocolumn aligns neurotransmitter release to receptors. Nature 536:210–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19058
Hruska M, Henderson N, Le Marchand SJ et al (2018) Synaptic nanomodules underlie the organization and plasticity of spine synapses. Nat Neurosci 21:671–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0138-9
Heine M, Holcman D (2020) Asymmetry between pre- and postsynaptic transient nanodomains shapes neuronal communication. Trends Neurosci 43:182–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.01.005
Butola T, Alvanos T, Hintze A et al (2021) RIM-binding protein 2 organizes Ca(2+) channel topography and regulates release probability and vesicle replenishment at a fast central synapse. J Neurosci 41:7742–7767. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0586-21.2021
Grauel MK, Maglione M, Reddy-Alla S et al (2016) RIM-binding protein 2 regulates release probability by fine-tuning calcium channel localization at murine hippocampal synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:11615–11620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605256113
Haas KT, Compans B, Letellier M et al (2018) Pre-post synaptic alignment through neuroligin-1 tunes synaptic transmission efficiency. elife 7:e31755. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31755
Pennacchietti F, Vascon S, Nieus T et al (2017) Nanoscale molecular reorganization of the inhibitory postsynaptic density is a determinant of GABAergic synaptic potentiation. J Neurosci 37:1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0514-16.2016
Gao Y, Hisey E, Bradshaw TWA et al (2019) Plug-and-play protein modification using homology-independent universal genome engineering. Neuron 103:583–597 e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.047
Nishiyama J, Mikuni T, Yasuda R (2017) Virus-mediated genome editing via homology-directed repair in mitotic and postmitotic cells in mammalian brain. Neuron 96:755–768 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.004
Willems J, de Jong APH, Scheefhals N et al (2020) ORANGE: a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing toolbox for epitope tagging of endogenous proteins in neurons. PLoS Biol 18:e3000665–e3000665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000665
Gross GG, Junge JA, Mora RJ et al (2013) Recombinant probes for visualizing endogenous synaptic proteins in living neurons. Neuron 78:971–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.017
Mora RJ, Roberts RW, Arnold DB (2013) Recombinant probes reveal dynamic localization of CaMKIIα within somata of cortical neurons. J Neurosci 33(36):14579–14590. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2108-13.2013
Cook SG, Goodell DJ, Restrepo S et al (2019) Simultaneous live imaging of multiple endogenous proteins reveals a mechanism for Alzheimer’s-related plasticity impairment. Cell Rep 27:658–665.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.041
Son J-H, Keefe MD, Stevenson TJ et al (2016) Transgenic FingRs for live mapping of synaptic dynamics in genetically-defined neurons. Sci Rep 6:18734. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18734
Comer AL, Jinadasa T, Sriram B et al (2020) Increased expression of schizophrenia-associated gene C4 leads to hypoconnectivity of prefrontal cortex and reduced social interaction. PLoS Biol 18:e3000604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000604
Green MV, Pengo T, Raybuck JD et al (2019) Automated live-cell imaging of synapses in rat and human neuronal cultures. Front Cell Neurosci 13:467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00467
Zhang X, Green MV, Thayer SA (2019) HIV gp120-induced neuroinflammation potentiates NMDA receptors to overcome basal suppression of inhibitory synapses by p38 MAPK. J Neurochem 148:499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14640
Fossati M, Assendorp N, Gemin O et al (2019) Trans-synaptic signaling through the glutamate receptor delta-1 mediates inhibitory synapse formation in cortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron 104:1081–1094.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.027
Levet F, Tønnesen J, Nägerl UV, Sibarita J-B (2020) SpineJ: a software tool for quantitative analysis of nanoscale spine morphology. Methods 174:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.01.020
Inavalli VVGK, Lenz MO, Butler C et al (2019) A super-resolution platform for correlative live single-molecule imaging and STED microscopy. Nat Methods 16:1263–1268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0611-8
Nair D, Hosy E, Petersen JD et al (2013) Super-resolution imaging reveals that AMPA receptors inside synapses are dynamically organized in nanodomains regulated by PSD95. J Neurosci 33:13204–13224. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2381-12.2013
Charrier C, Joshi K, Coutinho-Budd J et al (2012) Inhibition of SRGAP2 function by its human-specific paralogs induces neoteny during spine maturation. Cell 149:923–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.034
Fossati M, Pizzarelli R, Schmidt ER et al (2016) SRGAP2 and its human-specific paralog co-regulate the development of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Neuron 91:356–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.013
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2018-12366478 to M.F.) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement 845466 to A.F.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Fossati, M., Erreni, M., Biagioni, M., Folci, A. (2022). Assessing the Nanoscale Organization of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses Using Recombinant Probes to Visualize Endogenous Synaptic Proteins. In: Martin, S., Laumonnier, F. (eds) Translational Research Methods in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Neuromethods, vol 185. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2569-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2569-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2568-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2569-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols