Abstract
Plant DNA preserved in ancient specimens has recently gained importance as a tool in comparative genomics, allowing the investigation of evolutionary processes in plant genomes through time. However, recovering the genomic information contained in such specimens is challenging owing to the presence of secondary substances that limit DNA retrieval. In this chapter, we provide a DNA extraction protocol optimized for the recovery of DNA from degraded plant materials. The protocol is based on a commercially available DNA extraction kit that does not require handling of hazardous reagents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Orlando L, Allaby R, Skoglund P et al (2021) Ancient DNA analysis. Nat Rev Methods Prim 1:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00011-0
Mitchell KJ, Rawlence NJ (2021) Examining natural history through the lens of Palaeogenomics. Trends Ecol Evol 36:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.005
Kistler L, Bieker VC, Martin MD et al (2020) Ancient plant genomics in archaeology, herbaria, and the environment. Annu Rev Plant Biol 71:605–629. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-081519-035837
Mascher M, Schuenemann VJ, Davidovich U et al (2016) Genomic analysis of 6,000-year-old cultivated grain illuminates the domestication history of barley. Nat Genet 48(9):1089–1093. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3611
Vallebueno-Estrada M, Rodríguez-Arévalo I, Rougon-Cardoso A et al (2016) The earliest maize from San Marcos Tehuacán is a partial domesticate with genomic evidence of inbreeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:14151–14156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609701113
Ramos-Madrigal J, Smith BD, Moreno-Mayar JV et al (2016) Genome sequence of a 5,310-year-old maize cob provides insights into the early stages of maize domestication. Curr Biol 26:3195–3201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.036
Swarts K, Gutaker RM, Benz B et al (2017) Genomic estimation of complex traits reveals ancient maize adaptation to temperate North America. Science 357:512–515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9425
Scott MF, Botigué LR, Brace S et al (2019) A 3,000-year-old Egyptian emmer wheat genome reveals dispersal and domestication history. Nat Plants 5:1120–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0534-5
Smith O, Nicholson WV, Kistler L et al (2019) A domestication history of dynamic adaptation and genomic deterioration in sorghum. Nat Plants 5:369–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0397-9
Ramos-Madrigal J, Runge AKW, Bouby L et al (2019) Palaeogenomic insights into the origins of French grapevine diversity. Nat Plants 5:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0437-5
Wagner S, Lagane F, Seguin-Orlando A et al (2018) High-throughput DNA sequencing of ancient wood. Mol Ecol 27:1138–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14514
Gugerli F, Parducci L, Petit RJ (2005) Ancient plant DNA: review and prospects. New Phytol 166:409–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01360.x
Palmer SA, Smith O, Allaby RG (2012) The blossoming of plant archaeogenetics. Ann Anat 194:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2011.03.012
Birks HJB, Birks HH (2016) How have studies of ancient DNA from sediments contributed to the reconstruction of quaternary floras? New Phytol 209:499–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13657
Parducci L, Bennett KD, Ficetola GF et al (2017) Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments. New Phytol 214:924–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14470
Winkel T, Aguirre MG, Arizio CM et al (2018) Discontinuities in quinoa biodiversity in the dry Andes: an 18-century perspective based on allelic genotyping. PLoS One 13:e0207519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207519
Hofreiter M, Serre D, Poinar HN et al (2001) Ancient DNA. Nat Rev Genet 2:353–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/35072071
Paabo S, Poinar H, Serre D et al (2004) Genetic analyses from ancient DNA. Annu Rev Genet 38:645–679. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214
Dabney J, Meyer M, Pa S (2013) Ancient DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012567
Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R (2012) PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol 113:1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x
Cappellini E, Gilbert MTP, Geuna F et al (2010) A multidisciplinary study of archaeological grape seeds. Naturwissenschaften 97:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0629-3
Wales N, Andersen K, Cappellini E et al (2014) Optimization of DNA recovery and amplification from non-carbonized archaeobotanical remains. PLoS One 9:e86827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086827
Palmer SA, Moore JD, Clapham AJ et al (2009) Archaeogenetic evidence of ancient nubian barley evolution from six to two-row indicates local adaptation. PLoS One 4:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006301
Kistler L (2012) Ancient DNA extraction from plants. In: Shapiro B, Hofreiter M (eds) Ancient DNA: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 71–79
Heenan PB, Wood JR, Cole TL (2018) A partial cpDNA trnL sequence from the extinct legume Streblorrhiza speciosa confirms its placement in the tribe Coluteae (Fabaceae). Phytotaxa 374:87–91. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.374.1.8
Champlot S, Berthelot C, Pruvost M et al (2010) An efficient multistrategy DNA decontamination procedure of PCR reagents for hypersensitive PCR applications. PLoS One 5:e13042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013042
Tamariz J, Voynarovska K, Prinz M, Caragine T (2006) The application of ultraviolet irradiation to exogenous sources of DNA in plasticware and water for the amplification of low copy number DNA. J Forensic Sci 51:790–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00172.x
Shapiro B, Barlow A, Heintzman PD et al (2019) Ancient DNA methods and protocols, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY
Cooper A, Poinar H (2000) Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Science 289:1139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5482.1139b
Llamas B, Valverde G, Fehren-Schmitz L et al (2017) From the field to the laboratory: controlling DNA contamination in human ancient DNA research in the high-throughput sequencing era. STAR Sci Technol Archaeol Res 3:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2016.1258824
Acknowledgments
O.E. was supported during his PhD by the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation of Colombia (COLCIENCIAS), grants CF14-0461/CF15-0672/CF16-0551: Recovery of lost genetic diversity in barley from the Carlsberg Foundation; and grant LP130100648: Identifying the diversity and evolution of loci associated with adaptation to aridity/heat and salinity in ancient cereal crops from the Australian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Estrada, O., Richards, S.M., Breen, J. (2022). Discovering the Secrets of Ancient Plants: Recovery of DNA from Museum and Archaeological Plant Specimens. In: Pereira-Santana, A., Gamboa-Tuz, S.D., Rodríguez-Zapata, L.C. (eds) Plant Comparative Genomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2512. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2429-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2429-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2428-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2429-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols