Abstract
This chapter contains a methodological framework for choosing a model for the meta-analysis of very few studies and selecting an estimation method for the chosen model by means of study characteristics and by comparing results yielded by different approaches. When the results are inconclusive between different estimation methods, it might be the best solution to refrain from a quantitative meta-analysis but to summarize the study results by means of a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, Chichester
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1(2):97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
DerSimonian R, Laird NM (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188
Bender R, Friede T, Koch A, Kuss O, Schlattmann P, Schwarzer G, Skipka G (2018) Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies. Res Synth Methods 9(3):382–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1297
Cornell JE, Mulrow CD, Localio R, Stack CB, Meibohm AR, Guallar E, Goodman SN (2014) Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change. Ann Intern Med 160(4):267–270
Novianti PW, Roes KC, van der Tweel I (2014) Estimation of between-trial variance in sequential meta-analyses: a simulation study. Contemp Clin Trials 37(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2013.11.012
Paule RC, Mandel J (1982) Consensus values and weighting factors. J Res Natl Bureau Standards 87(5):377–385. https://doi.org/10.6028/Jres.087.022
Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, Bender R, Bowden J, Knapp G, Kuss O, Higgins JP, Langan D, Salanti G (2016) Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 7(1):55–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1164
Hartung J (1999) An alternative method for meta-analysis. Biom J 41(8):901–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/(Sici)1521-4036(199912)41:8<901::Aid-Bimj901>3.0.Co;2-W
Knapp G, Hartung J (2003) Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Stat Med 22(17):2693–2710. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1482
Sidik K, Jonkman JN (2002) A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(21):3153–3159. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1262
Sidik K, Jonkman JN (2003) On constructing confidence intervals for a standardized mean difference in meta-analysis. Commun Stat Simulation Comput 32(4):1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1081/Sac-120023885
Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, Bender R, Knapp G, Kuss O, Langan D (2015) Recommendations for quantifying the uncertainty in the summary intervention effect and estimating the between-study heterogeneity variance in random-effectsmeta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):1–72
Jackson D, Law M, Rucker G, Schwarzer G (2017) The Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: a useful refinement but are there any residual concerns? Stat Med 36(25):3923–3934. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7411
Mathes T, Kuss O (2018) A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes. Res Synth Methods 9(3):366–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1296
Simmonds MC, Higgins JPT, Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG (2005) Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice. Clin Trials 2(3):209–217. https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774505cn087oa
Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22(4):719–748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/22.4.719
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
Wiksten A, Rucker G, Schwarzer G (2016) Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis. Stat Med 35(15):2503–2515. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6879
IQWiG (2020) General methods, version 6.0 of 5 November 2020. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. https://www.iqwig.de/methoden/general-methods_version-6-0.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2020
Guddat C, Grouven U, Bender R, Skipka G (2012) A note on the graphical presentation of prediction intervals in random-effects meta-analyses. Syst Rev 1:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-34
Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, Littlewood A, Marshall C, Metzendorf M, Noel-Storr A, Rader T (2019) Searching for and selecting studies. In: JPT H, Thomas J, Chandler J et al (eds) Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 67–107
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F (2000) Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Riley RD, Lambert PC, Abo-Zaid G (2010) Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ 340(7745):c221
Riley RD, Lambert PC, Staessen JA, Wang J, Gueyffier F, Thijs L, Boutitie F (2008) Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data. Stat Med 27(11):1870–1893
Stijnen T, Hamza TH, Özdemir P (2010) Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Stat Med 29(29):3046–3067. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4040
Simmonds MC, Higgins JP (2016) A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 25(6):2858–2877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280214534409
Kuss O (2015) Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events-add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless. Stat Med 34(7):1097–1116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6383
Bakbergenuly I, Kulinskaya E (2018) Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol 18(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0531-9
Friede T, Rover C, Wandel S, Neuenschwander B (2017) Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases. Biom J 59(4):658–671. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201500236
Friede T, Röver C, Wandel S, Neuenschwander B (2017) Meta-analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases. Res Synth Methods 8(1):79–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1217
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Schulz, A., Schürmann, C., Skipka, G., Bender, R. (2022). Performing Meta-analyses with Very Few Studies. In: Evangelou, E., Veroniki, A.A. (eds) Meta-Research. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2345. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1565-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1566-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols