Advertisement

Engineering Shape-Controlled Microtissues on Compliant Hydrogels with Tunable Rigidity and Extracellular Matrix Ligands

Protocol
  • 797 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2258)

Abstract

In vitro models that recapitulate key aspects of native tissue architecture and the physical microenvironment are emerging systems for modeling development and disease. For example, the myocardium consists of layers of aligned and coupled cardiac myocytes that are interspersed with supporting cells and embedded in a compliant extracellular matrix (ECM). These cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions are known to be important regulators of tissue physiology and pathophysiology. In this protocol, we describe a method for mimicking the alignment, cell–cell interactions, and rigidity of the myocardium by engineering an array of square, aligned cardiac microtissues on polyacrylamide hydrogels. This entails three key methods: (1) fabricating elastomer stamps with a microtissue pattern; (2) preparing polyacrylamide hydrogel culture substrates with tunable elastic moduli; and (3) transferring ECM proteins onto the surface of the hydrogels using microcontact printing. These hydrogels can then be seeded with cardiac myocytes or mixtures of cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts to adjust cell–cell interactions. Overall, this approach is advantageous because shape-controlled microtissues encompass both cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesions in a form factor that is relatively reproducible and scalable. Furthermore, polyacrylamide hydrogels are compatible with the traction force microscopy assay for quantifying contractility, a critical function of the myocardium. Although cardiac microtissues are the example presented in this protocol, the techniques are relatively versatile and could have many applications in modeling other tissue systems.

Key words

Cardiac myocytes Microcontact printing Photolithography Polyacrylamide hydrogels 

References

  1. 1.
    Rienks M, Papageorgiou AP, Frangogiannis NG, Heymans S (2014) Myocardial extracellular matrix: an ever-changing and diverse entity. Circ Res 114(5):872–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry MF, Engler AJ, Woo YJ, Pirolli TJ, Bish LT, Jayasankar V, Morine KJ, Gardner TJ, Discher DE, Sweeney HL (2006) Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290(6):H2196–H2203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reimer KA, Ideker RE (1987) Myocardial ischemia and infarction: anatomic and biochemical substrates for ischemic cell death and ventricular arrhythmias. Hum Pathol 18(5):462–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van den Borne SW, Diez J, Blankesteijn WM, Verjans J, Hofstra L, Narula J (2010) Myocardial remodeling after infarction: the role of myofibroblasts. Nat Rev Cardiol 7(1):30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ariyasinghe NR, Lyra-Leite DM, McCain ML (2018) Engineering cardiac microphysiological systems to model pathological extracellular matrix remodeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 315(4):H771–H789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM (2010) Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protoc 5(3):491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ribeiro AJ, Ang YS, Fu JD, Rivas RN, Mohamed TM, Higgs GC, Srivastava D, Pruitt BL (2015) Contractility of single cardiomyocytes differentiated from pluripotent stem cells depends on physiological shape and substrate stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(41):12705–12710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wheelwright M, Win Z, Mikkila JL, Amen KY, Alford PW, Metzger JM (2018) Investigation of human iPSC-derived cardiac myocyte functional maturation by single cell traction force microscopy. PLoS One 13(4):e0194909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCain ML, Yuan H, Pasqualini FS, Campbell PH, Parker KK (2014) Matrix elasticity regulates the optimal cardiac myocyte shape for contractility. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 306(11):H1525–H1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bray MA, Sheehy SP, Parker KK (2008) Sarcomere alignment is regulated by myocyte shape. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 65(8):641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knight MB, Drew NK, McCarthy LA, Grosberg A (2016) Emergent global contractile force in cardiac tissues. Biophys J 110(7):1615–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feinberg AW, Alford PW, Jin H, Ripplinger CM, Werdich AA, Sheehy SP, Grosberg A, Parker KK (2012) Controlling the contractile strength of engineered cardiac muscle by hierarchal tissue architecture. Biomaterials 33(23):5732–5741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grosberg A, Alford PW, McCain ML, Parker KK (2011) Ensembles of engineered cardiac tissues for physiological and pharmacological study: heart on a chip. Lab Chip 11(24):4165–4173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lyra-Leite DM, Andres AM, Petersen AP, Ariyasinghe NR, Cho N, Lee JA, Gottlieb RA, McCain ML (2017) Mitochondrial function in engineered cardiac tissues is regulated by extracellular matrix elasticity and tissue alignment. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 313(4):H757–H767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petersen AP, Lyra-Leite DM, Ariyasinghe NR, Cho N, Goodwin CM, Kim JY, McCain ML (2018) Microenvironmental modulation of calcium wave propagation velocity in engineered cardiac tissues. Cell Mol Bioeng 11(5):337–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ariyasinghe NR, Reck CH, Viscio AA, Petersen AP, Lyra-Leite DM, Cho N, McCain ML (2017) Engineering micromyocardium to delineate cellular and extracellular regulation of myocardial tissue contractility. Integr Biol (Camb) 9(9):730–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berk BC, Fujiwara K, Lehoux S (2007) ECM remodeling in hypertensive heart disease. J Clin Invest 117(3):568–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ho CY, Lopez B, Coelho-Filho OR, Lakdawala NK, Cirino AL, Jarolim P, Kwong R, Gonzalez A, Colan SD, Seidman JG, Diez J, Seidman CE (2010) Myocardial fibrosis as an early manifestation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 363(6):552–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aratyn-Schaus Y, Oakes PW, Stricker J, Winter SP, Gardel ML (2010) Preparation of complaint matrices for quantifying cellular contraction. J Vis Exp 46:2173Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Engler AJ, Carag-Krieger C, Johnson CP, Raab M, Tang HY, Speicher DW, Sanger JW, Sanger JM, Discher DE (2008) Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 22):3794–3802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jacot JG, Kita-Matsuo H, Wei KA, Chen HS, Omens JH, Mercola M, McCulloch AD (2010) Cardiac myocyte force development during differentiation and maturation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1188:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, Bonnemann CG, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2004) Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol 166(6):877–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hazeltine LB, Simmons CS, Salick MR, Lian X, Badur MG, Han W, Delgado SM, Wakatsuki T, Crone WC, Pruitt BL, Palecek SP (2012) Effects of substrate mechanics on contractility of cardiomyocytes generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Int J Cell Biol 2012:508294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aratyn-Schaus Y, Pasqualini FS, Yuan H, McCain ML, Ye GJ, Sheehy SP, Campbell PH, Parker KK (2016) Coupling primary and stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in an in vitro model of cardiac cell therapy. J Cell Biol 212(4):389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pasqualini FS, Agarwal A, O’Connor BB, Liu Q, Sheehy SP, Parker KK (2018) Traction force microscopy of engineered cardiac tissues. PLoS One 13(3):e0194706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCain ML, Lee H, Aratyn-Schaus Y, Kleber AG, Parker KK (2012) Cooperative coupling of cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesions in cardiac muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(25):9881–9886CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Living Systems Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, USC Viterbi School of EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Smidt Heart InstituteCedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USCUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations