Skip to main content

Genome Editing of Rice by CRISPR-Cas: End-to-End Pipeline for Crop Improvement

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Rice Genome Engineering and Gene Editing

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2238))

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas resonates a revolutionary genome editing technology applicable through a horizon spreading across microbial organism to higher plant and animal. This technology can be harnessed with ease to understand the basic genetics of a living system by altering sequence of individual genes and characterizing their functions. The precision of this technology is unparallel. It allows very precise and targeted base pair level edits in the genome. Here, in the current chapter, we have provided end-to-end process outline on how to generate genome edited plants in crops like rice to evaluate for agronomic traits associated with yield, disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance, etc. Genome editing process includes designing of gene editing strategy, vector construction, plant transformation, molecular screening, and phenotyping under control environment conditions. Furthermore, its application for development of commercial crop product may require additional processes, including field trials in the target geography for evaluation of product efficacy. Evaluation of genome edited lines in controlled greenhouse/net house or open field condition requires few generations for outcrossing with wild-type parent to eliminate and/or reduce any potential pleiotropic effect in the edited genome which may arise during the process. The genome edited plant selected for advancement shall harbor the genome with only the intended changes, which can be analyzed by various molecular techniques, advanced sequencing methods, and genomic data analysis tools. CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing has opened a plethora of opportunities in agriculture as well as human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Makarova KS, Grishin NV, Shabalina SA, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2006) A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action. Biol Direct 1:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jansen R, Embden JD, Gaastra W, Schouls LM (2002) Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol 43:1565–1575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA, Horvath P (2007) CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315(5819):1709–1712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Haer M, Doudna J, Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wyman C, Kanaar R (2006) DNA double-strand break repair: all’s well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 40:363–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31:397–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Waterworth WM, Drury GE, Bray CM, West CE (2011) Repairing breaks in the plant genome: the importance of keeping it together. New Phytol 192:805–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Podevin N, Davies HV, Hartung Nogué F, Casacuberta JM (2013) Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. Trends Biotechnol 31:375–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, Zhang K, Liu J, Xi JJ, Qiu JL, Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31:686–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J, Church GM, Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 31:688–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang DL, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y, Zhu JK (2013) Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23:1229–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhang B, Gao F, Zhu J-K (2013) Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant 6(6):2008–2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie K, Yang Y (2013) RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Mol Plant 6:1975–1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, Zhang X, Wan J, Gu H, Qu LJ (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res 23:1233–1236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP (2013) Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 41(20):e188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang H, Zhang J, Wei P, Zhang B, Gou F, Feng Z, Mao Y, Yang L, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol J 12:797–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li M, Li X, Zhou Z, Wu P, Fang M, Pan X, Lin Q, Luo W, Wu G, Li H (2016) Reassessment of the four yield-related genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in Rice using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci 7:377

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zong Y, Wang Y, Li C, Zhang R, Chen K, Ran Y, Qiu JL, Wang D, Gao C (2017) Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol 35:438–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V (2013) Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9:39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Svitashev S, Schwartz C, Lenderts B, Young JK, Cigan MA (2016) Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun 7:13274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalán C, Cho SW, Kim H, Kim SG, Kim ST, Choe S, Kim JS (2015) DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 33:1162–1164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Malnoy M, Viola R, Jung MH, Koo OJ, Kim S, Kim JS, Velasco R, Nagamangala KC (2016) DNA-free genetically edited grapevine and apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front Plant Sci 7:1904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Liang Z, Chen K, Li T, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhao Q, Liu J, Zhang H, Liu C, Ran Y, Gao C (2017) Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun 8:14261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Andersson M, Turesson H, Olsson N, Fält AS, Ohlsson P, Gonzalez MN, Samuelsson M, Hofvander P (2018) Genome editing in potato via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery. Physiol Plant 164:378–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang Z, Chen K, Zhang Y, Liu J, Yin K, Qiu JL, Gao C (2018) Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins. Nat Protoc 13:413–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miao C, Xiao L, Hua K, Zou C, Zhao Y, Bressan RA, Zhu J-K (2018) Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor genes promote rice growth and productivity. PNAS 115:6058–6063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yin K, Gao C, Qiu JL (2017) Progress and prospects in plant genome editing. Nat Plants 3:17107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weeks DP (2017) Gene editing in polyploid crops: wheat, camelina, canola, potato, cotton, peanut, sugar cane, and citrus. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 149:65–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaeffer SM, Nakata PA (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: transitioning from lab to field. Plant Sci 240:130–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Paul JW III, Qi Y (2016) CRISPR/Cas9 for plant genome editing: accomplishments, problems and prospects. Plant Cell Rep 35:1417–1427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang M, Lu Y, Botella JR, Mao Y, Hua K, Zhu J-K (2017) Gene targeting by homology-directed repair in rice using a geminivirus-based CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 10:1007–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li J, Sun Y, Du J, Zhao Y, Xia L (2017) Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 10:526–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu Y, Zhu JK (2017) Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 10:523–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bandyopadhyay A, Mazumdar S, Yin X, Quick WP (2017) CRISPR: from prokaryotic immune systems to plant genome editing tools. Adv Exp Med Biol 1016:101–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Das A, Gandhi R, Tavva VS, Ferorova M, Angel J, Greene T, Mohanty A (2018) Precision breeding by CRISPR-Cas assisted genome editing. In: Rao PV, Muralidharan K, Siddiq EA (eds) Modern breeding strategies for crop improvement, proceedings of one-day dialogue. Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University (PJTSAU), Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India, pp 153–168p

    Google Scholar 

  36. Anders C, Niewoehner O, Duerst A, Jinek M (2014) Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513(7519):569–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR (2016) Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533(7603):420–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, Packer MS, Badran AH, Bryson DI, Liu DR (2017) Programmable base editing of a•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551(7681):464–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Li C, Zong Y, Wang Y, Jin S, Zhang D, Song Q, Zhang R, Gao C (2018) Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion. Genome Biol 19:59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Eid A, Alshareef S, Mahfouz MM (2018) CRISPR base editors: genome editing without double-stranded breaks. Biochem J 475:1955–1964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual, vol 1–3, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6:271–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mohanty A, Kathiria H, Ferjani A, Sakamoto A, Mohanty P, Murata N, Tyagi AK (2002) Transgenics of an elite indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1 harbouring the codA gene are highly tolerant to salt stress. Theor Appl Genet 106:51–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohanty A, Sarma NP, Tyagi AK (1999) Agrobacterium-mediated high frequency transformation of an elite indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1 and transmission of the transgenes to R2 progeny. Plant Sci 147:127–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hiei Y, Komari T (2008) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice using immature embryos or calli induced from mature seed. Nat Protoc 3:824–834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tomes DT, Ross MC, Songstad DD (1995) Direct DNA transfer into intact plant cells via microprojectile bombardment. In: Gamborg OL, Phillips GC (eds) Plant cell, tissue and organ culture. Springer lab manual. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 197–213

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Slamet-Loedin IH, Chadha-Mohanty P, Torrizo L (2014) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation: rice transformation. Methods Mol Biol 1099:261–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zastrow-Hayes GM, Lin H, Sigmund AL, Hoffman JL, Alarcon CM, Hayes KR, Richmond TA, Jeddeloh JA, May GD, Beatty MK (2015) Southern-by-sequencing: a robust screening approach for molecular characterization of genetically modified crops. Plant Genome 8:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Brooks C, Nekrasov V, Lippman ZB, Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-Associated9 system. Plant Physiol 166:1292–1297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was carried out at the DuPont Knowledge Centre, Corteva Agriscience™, Hyderabad, India. We’d like to thank the senior leadership of Corteva for their guidance and support. The authors would also like to thank Dharmendra Patil, Syam Sura, Geeta Pogula, Nilesh Sapkal, Girish Chandra, and Sunder Reddy for their diligent work. The support of the Applied Science and Technology (AST) group of Corteva for molecular analysis of the edited lines is duly acknowledged. The options expressed in this manuscript are of the authors and not that of the Corteva Agriscience™.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Das, A., Ghana, P., Rudrappa, B., Gandhi, R., Tavva, V.S., Mohanty, A. (2021). Genome Editing of Rice by CRISPR-Cas: End-to-End Pipeline for Crop Improvement. In: Bandyopadhyay, A., Thilmony, R. (eds) Rice Genome Engineering and Gene Editing. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2238. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1068-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1068-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1067-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1068-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics