Abstract
Dynamic modeling in systems and synthetic biology is still quite a challenge—the complex nature of the interactions results in nonlinear models, which include unknown parameters (or functions). Ideally, time-series data support the estimation of model unknowns through data fitting. Goodness-of-fit measures would lead to the best model among a set of candidates. However, even when state-of-the-art measuring techniques allow for an unprecedented amount of data, not all data suit dynamic modeling.
Model-based optimal experimental design (OED) is intended to improve model predictive capabilities. OED can be used to define the set of experiments that would (a) identify the best model or (b) improve the identifiability of unknown parameters. In this chapter, we present a detailed practical procedure to compute optimal experiments using the AMIGO2 toolbox.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jaqaman K, Danuser G (2006) Linking data to models: data regression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7(11):813–819
Balsa-Canto E, Alonso AA, Banga JR (2008) Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems. IET Syst Biol 2(4):163–172
Kreutz C, Timmer J (2009) Systems biology: experimental design. FEBS J 276(4):923–942
Walter E, Pronzato L (1997) Identification of parametric models from experimental data. Springer
Quarteroni A, Sacco R, Saleri F (2000) Numerical mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York
Fletcher R (1987) Practical methods of optimization. Wiley, Chichester
Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) Nonlinear regression. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Schittkowski K (2002) Numerical data fitting in dynamical systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Fröhlich F, Kaltenbacher B, Theis FJ, Hasenauer J (2017) Scalable parameter estimation for genome-scale biochemical reaction networks. PLoS Comp Biol 13(1):e1005331
Balsa-Canto E, Banga JR, Alonso AA, Vassiliadis VS (2002) Restricted second order information for the solution of optimal control problems using control vector parameterization. J Proc Cont 12(2):243–255
Lin Y, Stadtherr MA (2006) Deterministic global optimization for parameter estimation of dynamic systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:8438–8448
Polisetty P, Voit E, Gatzke E (2006) Identification of metabolic system parameters using global optimization methods. Theor Biol Med Model 3:4
Balsa-Canto E, Vassiliadis VS, Banga JR (2005) Dynamic optimization of single- and multi-stage systems using a hybrid stochastic-deterministic method. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(5):1514–1523
Rodriguez-Fernandez M, Mendes P, Banga JR (2006) A hybrid approach for efficient and robust parameter estimation in biochemical pathways. Biosystems 83(2–3):248–265
Villaverde AF, Fröhlich F, Weindl D, Hasenauer J, Banga JR (2019) Benchmarking optimization methods for parameter estimation in large kinetic models. Bioinformatics 35(5):830–838
Egea JA, Balsa-Canto E, GarcĂa M-SG, Banga JR (2009) Dynamic optimization of nonlinear processes with an enhanced scatter search method. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(9):4388–4401
Egea JA, Martà R, Banga JR (2010) An evolutionary method for complex-process optimization. Comp Oper Res 37(2):315–324
Balsa-Canto E, Henriques D, Gabor A, Banga JR (2016) AMIGO2, a toolbox for dynamic modeling, optimization and control in systems biology. Bioinformatics 32(21):3357–3359
Vassiliadis VS, Sargent RWH, Pantelides CC (1994) Solution of a class of multi-stage dynamic optimization problems: 1, problems without path constraints, 2, problems with path constraints. Ind Eng Chem Res 33(2111–2122):2123–2133
Gnugge R, Dharmarajan L, Lang M, Stelling J (2016) An orthogonal permease–inducer–repressor feedback loop shows bistability. ACS Synth Biol 5:1098–1107
Bandiera L, Hou Z, Kothamachu V, Balsa-Canto E, Swain P, Menolascina F (2018) On-line optimal input design increases the efficiency and accuracy of the modelling of an inducible synthetic promoter. Processes 6(9):148
Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11:341–359
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and the European Union FEDER (project grant RTI2018-093744-B-C33). This work was also supported by a Royal Society of Edinburgh-MoST grant, EPSRC grant EP/R035350/1 and EP/S001921/1 to Dr. Menolascina, and the EPSRC grant EP/P017134/1-CONDSYC to Dr. Bandiera.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Balsa-Canto, E., Bandiera, L., Menolascina, F. (2021). Optimal Experimental Design for Systems and Synthetic Biology Using AMIGO2. In: Menolascina, F. (eds) Synthetic Gene Circuits . Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2229. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1032-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1032-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1031-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1032-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols