Advertisement

Functional Analysis of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Genes in Yeast

  • Elisabeth TamayoEmail author
  • Tamara Gómez-Gallego
  • Nuria Ferrol
Protocol
  • 83 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2146)

Abstract

The obligate symbiotic nature of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi makes extremely difficult their genetic manipulation or transformation. For this reason, a heterologous system has been traditionally used for functional analysis of AM fungal genes, being the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae an organism suitable for this purpose. Here we present the yeast methods required for the functional analysis of AM fungal genes, including protocols for yeast transformation, heterologous gene expression, functional complementation assays, preparation of yeast extracts, and subcellular localization of the encoded protein.

Key words

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Functional characterization Heterologous gene expression Iron transport Saccharomyces cerevisiae Subcellular localization Yeast transformation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Tamara Gómez-Gallego was supported by a PhD contract (FPI) from the MINECO and Elisabeth Tamayo was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Alfonso Martin Escudero Foundation. We are grateful to Andrew Dancis for the laboratory protocol of iron transport assays. Research was funded by project RTI2018-098756-B-I00 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE). Elisabeth Tamayo and Tamara Gómez-Gallego contributed equally to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Sanders IR (1999) Evolutionary genetics. No sex please, we're fungi. Nature 399:737–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinnebusch AG, Johnston M (2011) YeastBook: an encyclopedia of the reference eukaryotic cell. Genetics 189:683–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christie KR, Weng S, Balakrishnan R et al (2004) Saccharomyces genome database (SGD) provides tools to identify and analyze sequences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related sequences from other organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D311–D314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giaever G, Nislow C (2014) The yeast deletion collection: a decade of functional genomics. Genetics 197:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maldonado-Mendoza IE, Dewbre GR, Harrison MJ (2001) A phosphate transporter gene from the extra-radical mycelium of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices is regulated in response to phosphate in the environment. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 14:1140–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benabdellah K, Merlos MA, Azcón-Aguilar C, Ferrol N (2009) GintGRX1, the first characterized glomeromycotan glutaredoxin, is a multifunctional enzyme that responds to oxidative stress. Fungal Genet Biol 46:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Helber N, Wippel K, Sauer N et al (2011) A versatile monosaccharide transporter that operates in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus sp is crucial for the symbiotic relationship with plants. Plant Cell 23:3812–3823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pérez-Tienda J, Testillano PS, Balestrini R et al (2011) GintAMT2, a new member of the ammonium transporter family in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. Fungal Genet Biol 48:1044–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellerbeck M, Schüßler A, Brucker D et al (2013) Characterization of three ammonium transporters of the glomeromycotan fungus Geosiphon pyriformis. Eukaryot Cell 12:1554–1562.  https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00139-13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Calabrese S, Pérez-Tienda J, Ellerbeck M et al (2016) GintAMT3—a low-affinity ammonium transporter of the arbuscular mycorrhizal Rhizophagus irregularis. Front Plant Sci 7:679.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00679CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tamayo E, Benabdellah K, Ferrol N (2016) Characterization of three new glutaredoxin genes in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis: putative role of RiGRX4 and RiGRX5 in iron homeostasis. PLoS One 11(2):e0149606.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tamayo E, Knight SAB, Valderas A et al (2018) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis uses a reductive iron assimilation pathway for high-affinity iron uptake. Environ Microbiol 20:1857–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kikuchi Y, Hijikata N, Ohtomo R et al (2016) Aquaporin-mediated long-distance polyphosphate translocation directed towards the host in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: application of virus-induced gene silencing. New Phytol 211:1202–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsuzuki S, Handa Y, Takeda N, Kawaguchi M (2016) Strigolactone-induced putative secreted protein 1 is required for the establishment of symbiosis by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 29:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xie X, Lin H, Peng X et al (2016) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis requires a phosphate transceptor in the Gigaspora margarita fungal symbiont. Mol Plant 9:1583–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun Z, Song J, Xin X et al (2018) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal 14-3-3 proteins are involved in arbuscule formation and responses to abiotic stresses during AM symbiosis. Front Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00091
  17. 17.
    Voß S, Betz R, Heidt S et al (2018) RiCRN1, a crinkler effector from the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis, functions in arbuscule development. Front Microbiol 9:2068.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02068CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Minet M, Dufour M, Lacroute F (1992) Complementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae auxotrophic mutants by Arabidopsis thaliana cDNAs. Plant J 2:417–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rentsch D, Laloi M, Rouhara I et al (1995) NTR1 encodes a high affinity oligopeptide transporter in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett 370:264–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sauer N, Stolz J (1994) SUC1 and SUC2: two sucrose transporters from Arabidopsis thaliana; expression and characterization in baker’s yeast and identification of the histidine-tagged protein. Plant J 6:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hill JE, Myers AM, Koerner TJ, Tzagoloff A (1986) Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gietz RD, Schiestl RH (2007) High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamilton NA (2012) Open source tools for fluorescent imaging. In: Conn PM (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 504. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, pp 393–417Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knight SAB, Vilaire G, Lesuisse E, Dancis A (2005) Iron acquisition from transferrin by Candida albicans depends on the reductive pathway. Infect Immun 73:5482–5492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Çağlayan M, Wilson SH (2014) Enzymatic activity assays in yeast cell extracts. Bio Protoc 4:23.  https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth Tamayo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tamara Gómez-Gallego
    • 2
  • Nuria Ferrol
    • 2
  1. 1.Molecular Phytopathology DepartmentBotanical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Department of Soil Microbiology and Symbiotic SystemsEstación Experimental del Zaidín, CSICGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations