Abstract
The third edition of “Plant Proteomics Methods and Protocols,” with the title “Advances in Proteomics Techniques, Data Validation, and Integration with Other Classic and -Omics Approaches in the Systems Biology Direction,” was conceived as being based on the success of the previous editions, and the continuous advances and improvements in proteomic techniques, equipment, and bioinformatics tools, and their uses in basic and translational plant biology research that has occurred in the past 5 years (in round figures, of around 22,000 publications referenced in WoS, 2000 were devoted to plants).
The monograph contains 29 chapters with detailed proteomics protocols commonly employed in plant biology research. They present recent advances at all workflow stages, starting from the laboratory (tissue and cell fractionation, protein extraction, depletion, purification, separation, MS analysis, quantification) and ending on the computer (algorithms for protein identification and quantification, bioinformatics tools for data analysis, databases and repositories). At the end of each chapter there are enough explanatory notes and comments to make the protocols easily applicable to other biological systems and/or studies, discussing limitations, artifacts, or pitfalls. For that reason, as with the previous editions, it would be especially useful for beginners or novices.
Out of the 29 chapters, six are devoted to descriptive proteomics, with a special emphasis on subcellular protein profiling (Chapters 5–10), six to PTMs (Chapters 11, and 14–18), three to protein interactions (Chapters 19–21), and two to specific proteins, peroxidases (Chapter 24) and proteases and protease inhibitors (Chapter 26). The book reflects the new trajectory in MS-based protein identification and quantification, moving from the classic gel-based approaches to the most recent labeling (Chapters 10, 11, 29), shotgun (Chapters 5, 7, 12, 15), parallel reaction monitoring (Chapter 16), and targeted data acquisition (Chapter 13). MS imaging (Chapter 25), the only in vivo MS-based proteomics strategy, is far from being fully optimized and exploited in plant biology research. A confident protein identification and quantitation, especially in orphan species, of low-abundance proteins, is still a challenging task (Chapters 4, 28).
What is really new is the use of different techniques for proteomics data validation and their integration into other classic and -omics approaches in the systems biology direction. Chapter 2 reports on multiple extractions in a single experiment of the different biomolecules, nucleic acids, proteins, and metabolites. Chapter 27 describes how metabolic pathways can be reconstructed from multiple -omics data, and Chapter 3 network building. Finally, Chapters 22 and 23 deal with, respectively, the search for allele-specific proteins and proteogenomics.
Around 200 groups were, almost 1 year ago, invited to take part in this edition. Unfortunately, only 10% of them kindly accepted. My gratitude to those who accepted our invitation but also to those who did not, as all of them have contributed to the plant proteomics field. I will enlist, in this introductory chapter, following my own judgment, some of the relevant papers published in the past 5 years, those that have shown us how to enhance and exploit the potential of proteomics in plant biology research, without aiming at giving a too exhaustive list.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Thiellement H, Zivy M, Damerval C et al (eds) (2007) Plant proteomics methods and protocols. Methods Mol Biol 355:1–8
Jorrin-Novo JV, Komatsu S, Weckwerth W et al (2014) Plant proteomics methods and protocols. In: Methods molecular biology, vol 1072, 2nd edn. Humana Press, Totowa
Jorrin Novo JV (2014) Plant proteomics methods and protocols. In: Novo J et al (eds) Chapter 1, plant proteomics methods and protocols, Methods molecular biology, vol 1072, 2nd edn. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 3–13
Rey MD, Valledor L, Castillejo MA et al (2019) Recent advances in MS-based plant proteomics: proteomics data validation through integration with other classic –omics approaches. In: Progress in botany. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Neilson KA, Ali NA, Muralidharan S et al (2011) Less label, more free: approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics 11:535–553
Picotti P, Bodenmiller B, Aebersold R (2013) Proteomics meets the scientific method. Nat Methods 10:24–27
Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S et al (2012) Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 11:O111.016717
Jorrin-Novo JV, Komatsu S, Sanchez-Lucas R et al (2018) Gel electrophoresis-based plant proteomics: past, present, and future. Happy 10th anniversary journal of proteomics. J Proteome 198:1–10
Luthria DL, Maria John KM, Marupaka R et al (2018) Recent update on methodologies for extraction and analysis of soybean seed proteins. J Sci Food Agric 98:5572–5580
Fesmire JD (2019) A brief review of other notable electrophoretic methods. Methods Mol Biol 1855:495–499
Minic Z, Dahms TES, Babu M (2018) Chromatographic separation strategies for precision mass spectrometry to study protein-protein interactions and protein phosphorylation. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1102-1103:96–108
Ankney JA, Muneer A, Chen X (2018) Relative and absolute quantitation in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Annu Rev Anal Chem 11:49–77
Eliuk S, Makarov A (2015) Evolution of Orbitrap mass spectrometry instrumentation. Annu Rev Anal Chem 8:61–80
Jung H, Winefield C, Bombarely A et al (2019) Tools and strategies for long-read sequencing and de novo assembly of plant genomes. Trends Plant Sci 24(8):P700–P724. (in press)
Guerrero-Sanchez VM, Maldonado-Alconada A, Amil-Ruiz et al (2019) Ion torrent and lllumina, two complementary RNA-seq platforms for constructing the holm oak (Quercus ilex) transcriptome. PLoS One 14:e0210356
Misra BB (2018) Updates on resources, software tools, and databases for plant proteomics in 2016–2017. Electrophoresis 39:1543–1557
Subba P, Narayana Kotimoole C et al (2019) Plant proteome databases and bioinformatic tools: an expert review and comparative insights. OMICS 23:190–206
Martens L, Vizcaíno JA (2017) A golden age for working with public proteomics data. Trends Biochem Sci 42:333–341
Duncan O, Trosch J, Fenske R et al (2017) Resource: mapping the Triticum aestivum proteome. Plant J 89:601–616
Katam K, Jones KA, Sakata K (2015) Advances in proteomics and bioinformatics in agriculture research and crop improvement. J Proteomics Bioinform 8:3
Hu J, Rampitsch C, Bykova NV (2015) Advances in plant proteomics toward improvement of crop productivity and stress resistance. Front Plant Sci 6:209
Carrera DA, Oddsson S, Grossmann J et al (2018) Comparative proteomic analysis of plant acclimation to six different long-term environmental changes. Plant Cell Physiol 59:510–526
Schneider S, Harant D, Bachmann G et al (2019) Subcellular phenotyping: using proteomics to quantitatively link subcellular leaf protein and organelle distribution analyses of Pisum sativum cultivars. Front Plant Sci 10:638
de Lamo FJ, Constantin ME, Fresno DH et al (2018) Xylem sap proteomics reveals distinct differences between R gene- and endophyte-mediated resistance against Fusarium wilt disease in tomato. Front Microbiol 9:2977
Lankinen A, Abreha KB, Masini L et al (2018) Plant immunity in natural populations and agricultural fields: Low presence of pathogenesis-related proteins in Solanum leaves. PLoS One 13:e0207253
Ghatak A, Chaturvedi P, Weckwerth W (2017) Cereal crop proteomics: systemic analysis of crop drought stress responses towards marker-assisted selection breeding. Front Plant Sci 8:757
Schaffer LV, Millikin RJ, Miller RM et al (2019) Identification and quantification of proteoforms by mass spectrometry. Proteomics 19:SI 1800361
Naryzhny S (2019) Inventory of proteoforms as a current challenge of proteomics: some technical aspects. J Proteome 191:22–28
Toby TK, Fornelli L, Kelleher NL (2016) Progress in top-down proteomics and the analysis of proteoforms. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto, Calif) 9:499–519
Hashiguchi A, Komatsu S (2017) Postranslational modifications and plant-environment interaction. Methods Enzymol 586:97–113
Wu XL, Gong FP, Cao D et al (2016) Advances in crop proteomics: PTMs of proteins under abiotic stress. Proteomics 16:847–865
Friso G, van Wijk KJ (2015) Posttranslational protein modification in plant metabolism. Plant Physiol 3:1469–1487
Vu LD, Gevaert K, De Smet I (2018) Protein language: post-translational modifications talking to each other. Trends Plant Sci 12:1068–1080
Zhu XL, Yu FC, Yang Z et al (2016) In planta chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry analysis of protein structure and interaction in Arabidopsis. Proteomics 16:1915–1927
Li GXH, Vogel C, Choi H (2018) PTMscape: an open source tool to predict generic post-translational modifications and map modification crosstalk in protein domains and biological processes. Mol Omics 14:197–209
Willems P, Horne A, Van Parys T, et al (2019) The Plant PTM Viewer, a central resource for exploring plant protein modifications. Plant J doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14345. [Epub ahead of print]
Yao H, Wang X, Chen P et al (2018) Predicted Arabidopsis interactome resource and gene set linkage analysis: a transcriptomic analysis resource. Plant Physiol 177:422–433
Rödiger A, Baginsky S (2018) Tailored use of targeted proteomics in plant-specific applications. Front Plant Sci 9:1204
Chawade A, Alexandersson E, Bengtsson T et al (2016) Targeted proteomics approach for precision plant breeding. J Proteome Res 15:638–646
Jaffe J, Berg HC, Church GM (2004) Proteogenomic mapping as a complementary method to perform genome annotation. Proteomics 4:59–77
Castellana NE, Payne SH, Shen Z (2008) Discovery and revision of Arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:21034–21038
Low TY, Mohtar MA, Ang MY et al (2019) Connecting proteomics to next-generation sequencing: Proteogenomics and its current applications in biology. Proteomics 19:e1800235
Hong WJ, Kim YJ, Chandran AKN et al (2019) Infrastructures of systems biology that facilitate functional genomic study in rice. Rice 12:15
Xiong J, Yang Q, Kang J et al (2011) Simultaneous isolation of DNA, RNA, and protein from Medicago truncatula L. Electrophoresis 32:321–330
Corujo M, Pla M, van Dijk J et al (2019) Use of omics analytical methods in the study of genetically modified maize varieties tested in 90 days feeding trials. Food Chem 292:359–371
Ponnaiah M, Gilard F, Gakiere B et al (2019) Regulatory actors and alternative routes for Arabidopsis seed germination are revealed using a pathway-based analysis of transcriptomic datasets. Plant J 99:163–175
Pais MS (2019) Somatic embryogenesis induction in woody species: the future after omics data assessment. Front Plant Sci 10:240
Li T, Wang YH, Liu JX et al (2019) Advances in genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches to study biotic stress in fruit crops. Crit Rev Biotechnol 39:680–692
Proust H, Hartmann C, Crespi M et al (2018) Root development in Medicago truncatula: lessons from genetics to functional genomics. Methods Mol Biol 1822:205–239
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Jorrin-Novo, J.V. (2020). What Is New in (Plant) Proteomics Methods and Protocols: The 2015–2019 Quinquennium. In: Jorrin-Novo, J., Valledor, L., Castillejo, M., Rey, MD. (eds) Plant Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2139. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0528-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0528-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0527-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0528-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols