Skip to main content

Dissecting Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Pluripotency: Single Cell Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Stem Cell Heterogeneity

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1516))

Abstract

Mouse Embryonic Stem cells (mESCs) show heterogeneous and dynamic expression of important pluripotency regulatory factors. Single-cell analysis has revealed the existence of cell-to-cell variability in the expression of individual genes in mESCs. Understanding how these heterogeneities are regulated and what their functional consequences are is crucial to obtain a more comprehensive view of the pluripotent state.

In this chapter we describe how to analyze transcriptional heterogeneity by monitoring gene expression of Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2, using single-molecule RNA FISH in single mESCs grown in different cell culture medium. We describe in detail all the steps involved in the protocol, from RNA detection to image acquisition and processing, as well as exploratory data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Niwa H (2007) How is pluripotency determined and maintained? Development 134:635–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyer LA et al (2005) Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122:947–956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Young RA (2011) Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144:940–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuijk EW et al (2008) Differences in early lineage segregation between mammals. Dev Dyn 237:918–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chambers I et al (2007) Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450:1230–1234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abranches E, Bekman E, Henrique D (2013) Generation and characterization of a novel mouse embryonic stem cell line with a dynamic reporter of Nanog expression. PLoS One 8:e59928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Abranches E et al (2014) Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency. Development 141:2770–2779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torres-Padilla M-EE, Chambers I (2014) Transcription factor heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells: a stochastic advantage. Development 141:2173–2181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalmar T et al (2009) Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 7:e1000149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. MacArthur BD et al (2012) Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity. Nat Cell Biol 14:1139–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi K, Lopes SM, Tang F, Surani MA (2008) Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell 3:391–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh AM, Hamazaki T, Hankowski KE, Terada N (2007) A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25:2534–2542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Murakami K, Takahashi K, Niwa H (2008) Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture. Development 135:909–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamaji M et al (2013) PRDM14 ensures naive pluripotency through dual regulation of signaling and epigenetic pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 12:368–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singer Z et al (2014) Dynamic heterogeneity and DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell 55:319–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eldar A, Elowitz MB (2010) Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467:167–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A (2008) Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135:216–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A (2009) Single-molecule approaches to stochastic gene expression. Annu Rev Biophys 38:255–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Raj A, van den Bogaard P, Rifkin SA, van Oudenaarden A, Tyagi S (2008) Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes. Nat Methods 5:877–879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Raj A, Peskin CS, Tranchina D, Vargas DY, Tyagi S (2006) Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol 4:e309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Etzrodt M, Endele M, Schroeder T (2014) Quantitative single-cell approaches to stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 15:546–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raj A, Tyagi S (2010) Detection of individual endogenous RNA transcripts in situ using multiple singly labeled probes. Meth Enzymol 472:365–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar R et al (2014) Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells. Nature 516:56–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Faddah DA et al (2013) Single-cell analysis reveals that expression of nanog is biallelic and equally variable as that of other pluripotency factors in mouse ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 13:23–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansen CH, van Oudenaarden A (2013) Allele-specific detection of single mRNA molecules in situ. Nat Methods 10:869–871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Miyanari Y, Torres-Padilla M-EE (2012) Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog. Nature 483:470–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaspar-Maia A, Alajem A, Meshorer E, Ramalho-Santos M (2011) Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:36–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Core Team RCTR (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pezzarossa A, Guedes A, Henrique D, Abranches E (2015) Imaging pluripotency time-lapse analysis of mouse embryonic stem cells. Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols, Volume 1341 of the series Methods in Molecular Biology pp 87–100

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ying Q-LL et al (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453:519–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Raj A, Tyagi S (2009) Imaging individual mrna molecules using multiple singly labeled probes, US Patent App. 13/062. http://www.google.com/patents/US20120129165

  32. RStudio Team (2015) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, http://www.rstudio.com/

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Batish M, Raj A, Tyagi S (2011) Single molecule imaging of RNA in situ. Methods Mol Biol 714:3–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aitken C, Marshall A, Puglisi J (2008) An oxygen scavenging system for improvement of dye stability in single-molecule fluorescence experiments. Biophys J 94:1826–1835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal [SFRH/ BPD/78313/2011 to E.A., SFRH/BD/80191/2011 to A.M.V.G. and PTDC/SAUOBD/100664/2008].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elsa Abranches .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Guedes, A.M.V., Henrique, D., Abranches, E. (2016). Dissecting Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Pluripotency: Single Cell Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. In: Turksen, K. (eds) Stem Cell Heterogeneity. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1516. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2016_356

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2016_356

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6549-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6550-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics