Abstract
Skeletal muscle stem cells are satellite cells that play crucial roles in tissue repair and regeneration after muscle injury. Accumulating evidence indicates that satellite cells are genetically and functionally heterogeneous, even within the same muscle. A small population of satellite cells possesses “stemness” and exhibits the remarkable ability to regenerate through robust self-renewal when transplanted into a regenerating muscle niche. In contrast, not all satellite cells self-renew. For example, some cells are committed myogenic progenitors that immediately undergo myogenic differentiation with minimal cell division after activation. Recent studies illuminate the cellular and molecular characteristics of the functional heterogeneity among satellite cells. To evaluate heterogeneity and stem cell dynamics, here we describe methods to conduct a clonal analysis of satellite cells and to visualize a slowly dividing cell population.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hoppe PS, Coutu DL, Schroeder T (2014) Single-cell technologies sharpen up mammalian stem cell research. Nat Cell Biol 16(10):919–927. doi:10.1038/ncb3042
Mauro A (1961) Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9:493–495
Zammit PS, Partridge TA, Yablonka-Reuveni Z (2006) The skeletal muscle satellite cell: the stem cell that came in from the cold. J Histochem Cytochem 54(11):1177–1191
Wang YX, Dumont NA, Rudnicki MA (2014) Muscle stem cells at a glance. J Cell Sci 127(21):4543–4548
Schultz E (1996) Satellite cell proliferative compartments in growing skeletal muscles. Dev Biol 175(1):84–94
Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le Grand F, Rudnicki MA (2007) Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129(5):999–1010
Rocheteau P, Gayraud-Morel B, Siegl-Cachedenier I, Blasco MA, Tajbakhsh S (2012) A subpopulation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells retains all template DNA strands after cell division. Cell 148(1–2):112–125
Chakkalakal JV, Jones KM, Basson MA, Brack AS (2012) The aged niche disrupts muscle stem cell quiescence. Nature 490(7420):355–360
Ono Y, Boldrin L, Knopp P, Morgan JE, Zammit PS (2010) Muscle satellite cells are a functionally heterogeneous population in both somite-derived and branchiomeric muscles. Dev Biol 337(1):29–41
Tanaka KK, Hall JK, Troy AA, Cornelison DD, Majka SM, Olwin BB (2009) Syndecan-4-expressing muscle progenitor cells in the SP engraft as satellite cells during muscle regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 4(3):217–225
Day K, Shefer G, Shearer A, Yablonka-Reuveni Z (2010) The depletion of skeletal muscle satellite cells with age is concomitant with reduced capacity of single progenitors to produce reserve progeny. Dev Biol 340(2):330–343
Ogawa R, Ma Y, Yamaguchi M, Ito T, Watanabe Y, Ohtani T, Murakami S, Uchida S, De Gaspari P, Uezumi A, Nakamura M, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Tsujikawa K, Hashimoto N, Braun T, Tanaka T, Takeda S, Yamamoto H, Fukada S (2015) Doublecortin marks a new population of transiently amplifying muscle progenitor cells and is required for myofiber maturation during skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 142(1):51–61
Sacco A, Doyonnas R, Kraft P, Vitorovic S, Blau HM (2008) Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells. Nature 456(7221):502–506
Ono Y, Masuda S, Nam HS, Benezra R, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S (2012) Slow-dividing satellite cells retain long-term self-renewal ability in adult muscle. J Cell Sci 125(Pt 5):1309–1317. doi:10.1242/jcs.096198
Moyle LA, Zammit PS (2014) Isolation, culture and immunostaining of skeletal muscle fibres to study myogenic progression in satellite cells. Methods Mol Biol 1210:63–78. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1435-7_6
Lepper C, Fan CM (2010) Inducible lineage tracing of Pax7-descendant cells reveals embryonic origin of adult satellite cells. Genesis 48(7):424–436. doi:10.1002/dvg.20630
Srinivas S, Watanabe T, Lin CS, William CM, Tanabe Y, Jessell TM, Costantini F (2001) Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev Biol 1:4
Ono Y, Urata Y, Goto S, Nakagawa S, Humbert PO, Li TS, Zammit PS (2015) Muscle stem cell fate is controlled by the cell-polarity protein Scrib. Cell Rep 10(7):1135–1148. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.045
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Daiki Seko for the image shown in Fig. 1a. This work was supported by the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), a Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (Research Project Number 25560338) and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists A (Research Project Number 15H05368) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and the Ichiro Kanehara Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kitajima, Y., Ogawa, S., Ono, Y. (2016). Visualizing the Functional Heterogeneity of Muscle Stem Cells. In: Turksen, K. (eds) Stem Cell Heterogeneity. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1516. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2016_349
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2016_349
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6549-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6550-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols