Advertisement

Ras Signaling pp 131-156 | Cite as

Behavioral Methods for the Study of the Ras–ERK Pathway in Memory Formation and Consolidation: Passive Avoidance and Novel Object Recognition Tests

  • Raffaele d’Isa
  • Riccardo Brambilla
  • Stefania Fasano
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1120)

Abstract

Memory is a high-level brain function that enables organisms to adapt their behavioral responses to the environment, hence increasing their probability of survival. The Ras–ERK pathway is a key molecular intracellular signalling cascade for memory consolidation. In this chapter we will describe two main one-trial behavioral tests commonly used in the field of memory research in order to assess the role of Ras–ERK signalling in long-term memory: passive avoidance and object recognition.

Passive avoidance (PA) is a fear-motivated instrumental learning task, designed by Jarvik and Essman in 1960, in which animals learn to refrain from emitting a behavioral response that has previously been associated with a punishment. We will describe here the detailed protocol and show some examples of how PA can reveal impairments or enhancements in memory consolidation following loss or gain of function genetic manipulations of the Ras–ERK pathway. The phenotypes of global mutants as Ras-GRF1 KO, GENA53, and ERK1 KO mice, as well as of conditional region-specific mutants (striatal K-CREB mice), will be illustrated as examples. Novel object recognition (NOR), developed by Ennaceur and Delacour in 1988, is instead a more recent and highly ecological test, which relies on the natural tendency of rodents to spontaneously approach and explore novel objects, representing hence a useful non-stressful tool for the study of memory in animals without the employment of punishments or starvation/water restriction regimens. Careful indications will be given on how to select the positions for the novel object, in order to counterbalance for individual side preferences among mice during the training. Finally, the methods for calculating two learning indexes will be described. In addition to the classical discrimination index (DI) that measures the ability of an animal to discriminate between two different objects which are presented at the same time, we will describe the formula of a new index that we present here for the first time, the recognition index (RI), which quantifies the ability of an animal to recognize a same object at different time points and that, by taking into account the basal individual preferences displayed during the training, can give a more accurate measure of an animal’s actual recognition memory.

Key words

Ras–ERK pathway Memory Passive avoidance Object recognition Recognition index (RI) Ras-GRF1 KO GENA 53 Ras-GRF1 OE ERK1 KO Mice 

References

  1. 1.
    Squire LR, Knowlton B, Musen G (1993) The structure and organization of memory. Annu Rev Psychol 44:453–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Milner B, Squire LR, Kandel ER (1998) Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory. Neuron 20:445–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Squire LR (2004) Memory systems of the brain: a brief history and current perspective. Neurobiol Learn Memory 82:171–177Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D'isa R, Solari N, Brambilla R (2011) Biological memory in animals and in man. In: Campardo G, Tiziani F, Iaculo M (eds) Memory mass storage. Springer, Berlin, pp 417–441Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis HP, Squire LR (1984) Protein synthesis and memory: a review. Psychol Bull 96:518–559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mcgaugh JL (2000) Memory – a century of consolidation. Science 287:248–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blum S, Dash PK (2009) MAP kinase signaling in learning and memory. In: Squire LR (ed) Encyclopedia of neuroscience, vol 5. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 657–662Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peng S, Zhang Y, Zhang J et al (2010) ERK in learning and memory: a review of recent research. Int J Mol Sci 11:222–232PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boulton TG, Nye SH, Robbins DJ et al (1991) ERKs: a family of protein-serine/threonine kinases that are activated and tyrosine phosphorylated in response to insulin and NGF. Cell 65:663–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crews CM, Alessandrini A, Erikson RL (1992) Erks: their fifteen minutes has arrived. Cell Growth Differ 3:135–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marshall C (1995) The Ras/Raf/ERK pathway. In: Zerial M, Huber LA (eds) Guidebook to the small GTPases. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 65–73Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malumbres M, Barbacid M (2003) RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nat Rev Cancer 3:459–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fernandez-Medarde A, Santos E (2011) Ras in cancer and developmental diseases. Genes Cancer 2:344–358PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    English JD, Sweatt JD (1996) Activation of p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase in hippocampal long term potentiation. J Biol Chem 271:24329–24332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    English JD, Sweatt JD (1997) A requirement for the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in hippocampal long term potentiation. J Biol Chem 272:19103–19106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brambilla R, Gnesutta N, Minichiello L et al (1997) A role for the Ras signalling pathway in synaptic transmission and long-term memory. Nature 390:281–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atkins CM, Selcher JC, Petraitis JJ et al (1998) The MAPK cascade is required for mammalian associative learning. Nat Neurosci 1:602–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orban PC, Chapman PF, Brambilla R (1999) Is the Ras-MAPK signalling pathway necessary for long-term memory formation? Trends Neurosci 22:38–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mazzucchelli C, Brambilla R (2000) Ras-related and MAPK signalling in neuronal plasticity and memory formation. CMLS 57:604–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adams JP, Sweatt JD (2002) Molecular psychology: roles for the ERK MAP kinase cascade in memory. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 42:135–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomas GM, Huganir RL (2004) MAPK cascade signalling and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:173–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davis S, Laroche S (2006) Mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular regulated kinase signalling and memory stabilization: a review. Genes Brain Behav 5(Suppl 2):61–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fasano S, Brambilla R (2011) Ras-ERK signaling in behavior: old questions and new perspectives. Front Behav Neurosci 5:1–6Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walz R, Roesler R, Quevedo J et al (1999) Dose-dependent impairment of inhibitory avoidance retention in rats by immediate post-training infusion of a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor into cortical structures. Behav Brain Res 105:219–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hebert AE, Dash PK (2002) Extracellular signal-regulated kinase activity in the entorhinal cortex is necessary for long-term spatial memory. Learn Mem 9:156–166PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berman DE, Hazvi S, Rosenblum K et al (1998) Specific and differential activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades by unfamiliar taste in the insular cortex of the behaving rat. J Neurosci 18:10037–10044PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Swank MW (2000) Pharmacological antagonism of tyrosine kinases and MAP kinase in brainstem blocks taste aversion learning in mice. Physiol Behav 69:499–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kelly A, Laroche S, Davis S (2003) Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase in hippocampal circuitry is required for consolidation and reconsolidation of recognition memory. J Neurosci 23:5354–5360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schafe GE, Atkins CM, Swank MW et al (2000) Activation of ERK/MAP kinase in the amygdala is required for memory consolidation of pavlovian fear conditioning. J Neurosci 20:8177–8187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Selcher JC, Atkins CM, Trzaskos JM et al (1999) A necessity for MAP kinase activation in mammalian spatial learning. Learn Mem 6:478–490PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shalin SC, Zirrgiebel U, Honsa KJ et al (2004) Neuronal MEK is important for normal fear conditioning in mice. J Neurosci Res 75:760–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dhaka A, Costa RM, Hu H et al (2003) The RAS effector RIN1 modulates the formation of aversive memories. J Neurosci 23:748–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poirier R, Jacquot S, Vaillend C et al (2007) Deletion of the Coffin-Lowry syndrome gene Rsk2 in mice is associated with impaired spatial learning and reduced control of exploratory behavior. Behav Genet 37:31–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee SE, Simons SB, Heldt SA et al (2010) RGS14 is a natural suppressor of both synaptic plasticity in CA2 neurons and hippocampal-based learning and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:16994–16998PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mazzucchelli C, Vantaggiato C, Ciamei A et al (2002) Knockout of ERK1 MAP kinase enhances synaptic plasticity in the striatum and facilitates striatal-mediated learning and memory. Neuron 34:807–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ferguson SM, Fasano S, Yang P et al (2006) Knockout of ERK1 enhances cocaine-evoked immediate early gene expression and behavioral plasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:2660–2668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Silingardi D, Angelucci A, De Pasquale R et al (2011) ERK pathway activation bidirectionally affects visual recognition memory and synaptic plasticity in the perirhinal cortex. Front Behav Neurosci 5:84PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Silva AJ, Frankland PW, Marowitz Z et al (1997) A mouse model for the learning and memory deficits associated with neurofibromatosis type I. Nat Genet 15:281–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Costa RM, Federov NB, Kogan JH et al (2002) Mechanism for the learning deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1. Nature 415:526–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Costa RM, Silva AJ (2003) Mouse models of neurofibromatosis type I: bridging the GAP. Trends Mol Med 9:19–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cui Y, Costa RM, Murphy GG et al (2008) Neurofibromin regulation of ERK signaling modulates GABA release and learning. Cell 135:549–560PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mowrer OH (1960) Learning theory and the symbolic processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liss P (1968) Avoidance and freezing behavior following damage to the hippocampus or fornix. J Comp Physiol Psychol 66:193–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Olton DS (1973) Shock-motivated avoidance and the analysis of behavior. Psychol Bull 79:243–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Netto CA, Izquierdo I (1985) On how passive is inhibitory avoidance. Behav Neural Biol 43:327–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jarvik ME, And Essman WB (1960) A simple one-trial situation for mice. Psychol Rep 6:290Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Essman WB, Alpern HP (1964) Single trial conditioning: methodology and results with mice. Psychol Rep 14:731–740Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kopp R, Bohdanecky Z, Jarvik ME (1966) Long temporal gradient of retrograde amnesia for a well-discriminated stimulus. Science 153:1547–1549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jarvik ME, Kopp R (1967) An improved one-trial passive avoidance learning situation. Psychol Rep 21:221–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Abt JP, Essman WB, Jarvik ME (1961) Ether-induced retrograde amnesia for one-trial conditioning in mice. Science 133:1477–1478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Madsen MC, Mc GJ (1961) The effect of ECS on one-trial avoidance learning. J Comp Physiol Psychol 54:522–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mcgaugh JL, Alpern HP (1966) Effects of electroshock on memory: amnesia without convulsions. Science 152:665–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mcgaugh JL (1966) Time-dependent processes in memory storage. Science 153:1351–1358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Luttges MW, Mcgaugh JL (1967) Permanence of retrograde amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock. Science 156:408–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fishbein W, Mcgaugh JL, Swarz JR (1971) Retrograde amnesia: electroconvulsive shock effects after termination of rapid eye movement sleep deprivation. Science 172:80–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Landfield PW, Mcgaugh JL, Tusa RJ (1972) Theta rhythm: a temporal correlate of memory storage processes in the rat. Science 175:87–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gold PE, Macri J, Mcgaugh JL (1973) Retrograde amnesia gradients: effects of direct cortical stimulation. Science 179:1343–1345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Glick SD, Greenstein S (1973) Comparative learning and memory deficits following hippocampal and caudate lesions in mice. J Comp Physiol Psychol 82:188–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Glick SD, Marsanico RG, Greenstein S (1974) Differential recovery of function following caudate, hippocampal, and septal lesions in mice. J Comp Physiol Psychol 86:787–792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Boast CA, Zornetzer SF, Hamrick MR (1975) Electrolytic lesions of various hippocampal subfields in the mouse: differential effects on short- and long-term memory. Behav Biol 14:85–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nagel JA, Kemble ED (1976) Effects of amygdaloid lesions on the performance of rats in four passive avoidance tasks. Physiol Behav 17:245–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Swartzwelder HS (1981) Deficits in passive avoidance and fear behavior following bilateral and unilateral amygdala lesions in mice. Physiol Behav 26:323–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Liang KC, Mcgaugh JL, Martinez JL Jr et al (1982) Post-training amygdaloid lesions impair retention of an inhibitory avoidance response. Behav Brain Res 4:237–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dunn LT, Everitt BJ (1988) Double dissociations of the effects of amygdala and insular cortex lesions on conditioned taste aversion, passive avoidance, and neophobia in the rat using the excitotoxin ibotenic acid. Behav Neurosci 102:3–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Prado-Alcala RA, Grinberg ZJ, Arditti ZL et al (1975) Learning deficits produced by chronic and reversible lesions of the corpus striatum in rats. Physiol Behav 15:283–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Prado-Alcala RA, Cruz-Morales SE, Lopez-Miro FA (1980) Differential effects of cholinergic blockade of anterior and posterior caudate nucleus on avoidance behaviors. Neuroscience Lett 18:339–345Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Prado-Alcala RA, Ruiloba MI, Rubio L et al (2003) Regional infusions of serotonin into the striatum and memory consolidation. Synapse 47:169–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sandberg K, Sanberg PR, Hanin I et al (1984) Cholinergic lesion of the striatum impairs acquisition and retention of a passive avoidance response. Behav Neurosci 98:162–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Boguski MS, Mccormick F (1993) Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives. Nature 366:643–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fernandez-Medarde A, Santos E (2011) The RasGrf family of mammalian guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1815:170–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Clapcott SJ, Peters J, Orban PC et al (2003) Two ENU-induced mutations in Rasgrf1 and early mouse growth retardation. Mamm Genome 14:495–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    D'isa R, Clapcote SJ, Voikar V et al (2011) Mice lacking Ras-GRF1 show contextual fear conditioning but not spatial memory impairments: convergent evidence from two independently generated mouse mutant lines. Front Behav Neurosci 5:78PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yoon B, Herman H, Hu B et al (2005) Rasgrf1 imprinting is regulated by a CTCF-dependent methylation-sensitive enhancer blocker. Mol Cell Biol 25:11184–11190PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Fasano S, D'antoni A, Orban PC et al (2009) Ras-guanine nucleotide-releasing factor 1 (Ras-GRF1) controls activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling in the striatum and long-term behavioral responses to cocaine. Biol Psychiatr 66:758–768Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Barco A, Pittenger C, Kandel ER (2003) CREB, memory enhancement and the treatment of memory disorders: promises, pitfalls and prospects. Expert Opin Ther Targets 7:101–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Carlezon WA Jr, Duman RS, Nestler EJ (2005) The many faces of CREB. Trends Neurosci 28:436–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Benito E, Barco A (2010) CREB's control of intrinsic and synaptic plasticity: implications for CREB-dependent memory models. Trends Neurosci 33:230–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Barco A, Marie H (2011) Genetic approaches to investigate the role of CREB in neuronal plasticity and memory. Mol Neurobiol 44:330–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kandel ER (2012) The molecular biology of memory: cAMP, PKA, CRE, CREB-1, CREB-2, and CPEB. Mol Brain 5:14PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Pittenger C, Huang YY, Paletzki RF et al (2002) Reversible inhibition of CREB/ATF transcription factors in region CA1 of the dorsal hippocampus disrupts hippocampus-dependent spatial memory. Neuron 34:447–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pittenger C, Fasano S, Mazzocchi-Jones D et al (2006) Impaired bidirectional synaptic plasticity and procedural memory formation in striatum-specific cAMP response element-binding protein-deficient mice. J Neurosci 26:2808–2813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ennaceur A, Delacour J (1988) A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 31:47–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ennaceur A (2010) One-trial object recognition in rats and mice: methodological and theoretical issues. Behav Brain Res 215:244–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ennaceur A, Neave N, Aggleton JP (1996) Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat. Behav Brain Res 80:9–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Aggleton JP, Keen S, Warburton EC et al (1997) Extensive cytotoxic lesions involving both the rhinal cortices and area TE impair recognition but spare spatial alternation in the rat. Brain Res Bull 43:279–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Bussey TJ, Muir JL, Aggleton JP (1999) Functionally dissociating aspects of event memory: the effects of combined perirhinal and postrhinal cortex lesions on object and place memory in the rat. J Neurosci 19:495–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mumby DG, Glenn MJ, Nesbitt C et al (2002) Dissociation in retrograde memory for object discriminations and object recognition in rats with perirhinal cortex damage. Behav Brain Res 132:215–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Winters BD, Forwood SE, Cowell RA et al (2004) Double dissociation between the effects of peri-postrhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on tests of object recognition and spatial memory: heterogeneity of function within the temporal lobe. J Neurosci 24:5901–5908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Norman G, Eacott MJ (2004) Impaired object recognition with increasing levels of feature ambiguity in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res 148:79–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hannesson DK, Howland JG, Pollock M et al (2005) Anterior perirhinal cortex kindling produces long-lasting effects on anxiety and object recognition memory. EJ Neurosci 21:1081–1090Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Norman G, Eacott MJ (2005) Dissociable effects of lesions to the perirhinal cortex and the postrhinal cortex on memory for context and objects in rats. Behav Neurosci 119:557–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Clark RE, Zola SM, Squire LR (2000) Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. J Neurosci 20:8853–8860PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hammond RS, Tull LE, Stackman RW (2004) On the delay-dependent involvement of the hippocampus in object recognition memory. Neurobiol Learn Memory 82:26–34Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ainge JA, Heron-Maxwell C, Theofilas P et al (2006) The role of the hippocampus in object recognition in rats: examination of the influence of task parameters and lesion size. Behav Brain Res 167:183–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Landi MS, Kreider JW, Lang CM et al (1982) Effects of shipping on the immune function in mice. Am J Vet Res 43:1654–1657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Tuli JS, Smith JA, Morton DB (1995) Stress measurements in mice after transportation. Lab Anim 29:132–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Hayssen V (1998) Effect of transatlantic transport on reproduction of agouti and nonagouti deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus. Lab Anim 32:55–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Tabata H, Kitamura T, Nagamatsu N (1998) Comparison of effects of restraint, cage transportation, anaesthesia and repeated bleeding on plasma glucose levels between mice and rats. Lab Anim 32:143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Obernier JA, Baldwin RL (2006) Establishing an appropriate period of acclimatization following transportation of laboratory animals. ILAR J 47:364–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Arts JWM, Ohl F, Kramer K (2008) Transportation as major life-event in rats: effects on welfare and limits of adaptation. In: AJ Spink, MR Ballintijn, ND Bogers, F Grieco, LWS Loijens, LPJJ Noldus, G Smit, PH Zimmerman (eds) Proceedings of the measuring behaviour 2008, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 26–29 August 2008, pp 356–357Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Arts JWM, Kramer K, Arndt SS, Ohl F (2012) The impact of transportation on physiological and behavioral parameters in wistar rats: implications for acclimatization periods. ILAR J 53:82–98Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Olfe J, Domanska G, Schuett C et al (2010) Different stress-related phenotypes of BALB/c mice from in-house or vendor: alterations of the sympathetic and HPA axis responsiveness. BMC Physiol 10:2PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Guidotti A, Dong E, Matsumoto K et al (2001) The socially-isolated mouse: a model to study the putative role of allopregnanolone and 5alpha-dihydroprogesterone in psychiatric disorders. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 37:110–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lapiz MD, Fulford A, Muchimapura S et al (2003) Influence of postweaning social isolation in the rat on brain development, conditioned behavior, and neurotransmission. Neurosci Behav Physiol 33:13–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Voikar V, Polus A, Vasar E et al (2005) Long-term individual housing in C57BL/6J and DBA/2 mice: assessment of behavioral consequences. Genes Brain Behav 4:240–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Fone KC, Porkess MV (2008) Behavioural and neurochemical effects of post-weaning social isolation in rodents-relevance to developmental neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:1087–1102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Laber K, Veatch LM, Lopez MF et al (2008) Effects of housing density on weight gain, immune function, behavior, and plasma corticosterone concentrations in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 47:16–23PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Deacon RM (2006) Housing, husbandry and handling of rodents for behavioral experiments. Nat Protoc 1:936–946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Ayars GH, Altman LC, Frazier CE et al (1989) The toxicity of constituents of cedar and pine woods to pulmonary epithelium. J Allergy Clin Immun 83:610–618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Vesell ES (1967) Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes in liver microsomes of mice and rats by softwood bedding. Science 157:1057–1058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Torronen R, Pelkonen K, Karenlampi S (1989) Enzyme-inducing and cytotoxic effects of wood-based materials used as bedding for laboratory animals. Comparison by a cell culture study. Life Sci 45:559–565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Odynets A, Simonova O, Kozhuhov A, Zaitsev T, Verreva A, Gnilomedova L, Rudzish R (1991) Beddings for laboratory animals: criteria of biological evaluation. Lab Zyhvotnye 1:70–76Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Cunliffe-Beamer TL, Freeman LC, Myers DD (1981) Barbiturate sleeptime in mice exposed to autoclaved or unautoclaved wood beddings. Lab Anim Sci 31:672–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Grailhe R, Waeber C, Dulawa SC et al (1999) Increased exploratory activity and altered response to LSD in mice lacking the 5-HT(5A) receptor. Neuron 22:581–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Zhuang X, Oosting RS, Jones SR et al (2001) Hyperactivity and impaired response habituation in hyperdopaminergic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:1982–1987PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Hoeffer CA, Tang W, Wong H et al (2008) Removal of FKBP12 enhances mTOR-Raptor interactions, LTP, memory, and perseverative/repetitive behavior. Neuron 60:832–845PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Trinh MA, Kaphzan H, Wek RC et al (2012) Brain-specific disruption of the eIF2alpha kinase PERK decreases ATF4 expression and impairs behavioral flexibility. Cell Rep 1:676–688PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Heyser CJ, Chemero A (2012) Novel object exploration in mice: not all objects are created equal. Behav Processes 89:232–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Calhoun JB (1949) A method for self-control of population growth among mammals living in the wild. Science 109:333–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Calhoun JB (1962) Population density and social pathology. Sci Am 206:139–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ramsden E (2009) The urban animal: population density and social pathology in rodents and humans. Bull World Health Organ 87:82PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Ramsden E, Adams J (2009) Escaping the laboratory: the rodent experiments of John B. Calhoun & their cultural influence. J Soc Hist 42:761–792Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Hock R (2004) Forty studies that changed psychology: explorations in the history of psychological thought. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raffaele d’Isa
    • 1
  • Riccardo Brambilla
    • 1
  • Stefania Fasano
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental NeurologySan Raffaele Scientific Institute and UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations