Molecular Toxicology Protocols pp 71-81

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1105)

Screening of DNA Methylation Changes by Methylation-Sensitive Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA-Polymerase Chain Reaction (MS-RAPD-PCR)

Protocol

Abstract

While the role of genetic events of DNA mutations in gene expression changes is well established, increasing evidence suggests that epigenetic changes of DNA methylation and histone modifications play important role in the regulation of gene expression. DNA methylation is the most frequent epigenetic alteration observed in mammalian genomes, and it frequently mediates transcriptional repression. Various methods are available for detection of DNA methylation changes. Methylation Sensitive-Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA-Polymerase Chain Reaction (MS-RAPD-PCR) is a restriction enzyme digestion and PCR-based method for analysis of DNA methylation changes. This method is cost-effective, requires simple and basic instrumentation, and therefore can easily be performed in any laboratory with basic setup with a regular DNA thermal cycler and DNA gel electrophoresis system. Other advantages of this method over other methods for DNA methylation analysis are that it requires very less DNA amount and can screen DNA methylation changes globally at genome wide level with high sensitivity. This method has been successfully used to detect DNA methylation changes associated with various human diseases including cancer. This chapter describes the detailed experimental protocol for MS-RAPD-PCR.

Key words

MS-RAPD-PCR Epigenetics DNA methylation MspI HpaII 

References

  1. 1.
    Bird A (1992) The essentials of DNA methylation. Cell 70:5–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bird A (2002) DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev 16:6–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R (1992) Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69:915–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panning B, Jaenisch R (1998) RNA and the epigenetic regulation of X chromosome inactivation. Cell 93:305–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R (1993) Role of DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 366:362–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walsh CP, Chaillet JR, Bestor TH (1998) Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation. Nat Genet 20:116–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones PA, Laird PW (1999) Cancer epigenetics come of age. Nat Genet 21:163–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robertson KD (2005) DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet 6:597–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frommer M et al (1992) A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:1827–1831PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiong Z, Laird PW (1997) COBRA: a sensitive and quantitative DNA methylation assay. Nucleic Acids Res 25:2532–2534PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weber M et al (2005) Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat Genet 37:853–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rauch T, Pfeifer GP (2005) Methylated-CpG island recovery assay: a new technique for the rapid detection of methylated – CpG islands in cancer. Lab Invest 85:1172–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonzalgo ML et al (1997) Identification and characterization of differentially methylated regions of the genomic DNA by methylation-sensitive arbitrary primed PCR. Cancer Res 57:594–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh KP, DuMond JW (2007) Genetic and epigenetic changes induced by chronic low dose exposure to arsenic in mouse testicular Leydig cells. Int J Oncol 30:253–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh KP, Kumari R, DuMond JW (2010) Simulated microgravity-induced epigenetic changes in human lymphocytes. J Cell Biochem 111:123–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ToxicologyThe Institute of Environmental and Human Health (TIEHH), Texas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations