Structural Genomics pp 17-32

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1091) | Cite as

Stable Expression Clones and Auto-Induction for Protein Production in E. coli

  • F. William Studier


Inducible production of proteins from cloned genes in E. coli is widely used, economical, and effective. However, common practices can result in unintended induction, inadvertently generating cultures that give poor or variable yields in protein production. Recipes are provided for (1) defined culture media in which expression strains grow to saturation without induction, thereby ensuring stable frozen stocks and seed cultures with high fractions of fully inducible cells, and (2) defined or complex media that maintain the same high fraction of inducible cells until auto-induction in late log phase to produce fully induced high-density cultures at saturation. Simply inoculating a suitable auto-inducing medium from such a seed culture and growing to saturation generally produces much higher levels of target protein per volume of culture than monitoring culture growth and adding IPTG or other inducer at the appropriate cell density. Many strains may be conveniently screened in parallel, and burdensome inoculation with fresh colonies, sometimes employed in hopes of assuring high yields, is entirely unnecessary. These media were developed for the T7 expression system using pET vectors in BL21(DE3) but are suitable or adaptable for other inducible expression systems in E. coli and for labeling proteins with selenomethionine for X-ray crystallography or with stable isotopes for NMR.

Key words

Auto-induction T7 expression system Stable inducible cultures Protein production Protein labeling 


  1. 1.
    Studier FW, Moffatt BA (1986) Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J Mol Biol 189:113–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Studier FW (1991) Use of bacteriophage T7 lysozyme to improve an inducible T7 expression system. J Mol Biol 219:37–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dubendorff JW, Studier FW (1991) Controlling basal expression in an inducible T7 expression system by blocking the target T7 promoter with lac repressor. J Mol Biol 219:45–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Studier FW, Rosenberg AH, Dunn JJ, Dubendorff JW (1990) Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol 185:60–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grossman TH, Kawasaki ES, Punreddy SR, Osburne MS (1998) Spontaneous cAMP-dependent derepression of gene expression in stationary phase plays a role in recombinant expression instability. Gene 209:95–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Studier FW (2005) Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif 41:207–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu J, Banerjee A, Pan S-H, Li ZJ (2012) Galactose can be an inducer for production of therapeutic proteins by auto-induction using E. coli BL21 strains. Protein Expr Purif 83:30–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Studier FW, Daegelen P, Lenski RE, Maslov S, Kim JF (2009) Understanding the differences between genome sequences of Escherichia coli B strains REL606 and BL21(DE3) and comparison of the E. coli B and K-12 genomes. J Mol Biol 394:653–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adhya S, Echols H (1966) Glucose effect and the galactose enzymes of E. coli: Correlation between glucose inhibition of induction and inducer transport. J Bacteriol 92:601–608PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. William Studier
    • 1
  1. 1.Biosciences DepartmentBrookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations