Human biomonitoring studies aim to identify potential exposures to environmental, occupational, or lifestyle toxicants in human populations and are commonly used by public health decision makers to predict disease risk. The Comet assay measures changes in genomic stability and is one of the most reliable biomarkers to indicate early biological effects, and therefore accepted by various governmental regulatory agencies. The appeal of the Comet assay lies in its relative simplicity, rapidity, sensitivity, and economic efficiency. Furthermore, the assay is known for its broad versatility, as it can be applied to virtually any human cell and easily adapted in order to detect particular biomarkers of interest, such as DNA repair capacity or single- and double-strand breaks. In a standard experiment, isolated single cells are first embedded in agarose, and then lysed in high-salt solutions in order to remove all cellular contents except the DNA attached to a nuclear scaffold. Subsequent electrophoresis results in accumulation of undamaged DNA sequences at the proximity of the nuclear scaffold, while damaged sequences migrate towards the anode. When visualized with fluorochromes, these migrated DNA fragments resemble a comet tail and can be quantified for their intensity and shape according to internationally drafted guidelines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
The funding from the UK India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI) standard award to the University of Bradford, UK, and the Institute of Life Sciences, Ahmedabad University, India, is gratefully acknowledged.
Angerer J, Aylward LL, Hays SM et al (2011) Human biomonitoring assessment values: approaches and data requirements. Int J Hyg Environ Health 214:348–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeters GE, Den Hond E, Koppen G et al (2011) Biomonitoring and biomarkers to unravel the risks from prenatal environmental exposures for later health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 94:1964S–1969SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paini A, Scholz G, Marin-Kuan M et al (2011) Quantitative comparison between in vivo DNA adduct formation from exposure to selected DNA-reactive carcinogens, natural background levels of DNA adduct formation and tumour incidence in rodent bioassays. Mutagenesis 26:605–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo LL, Egner PA, Belanger CL et al (2011) Aflatoxin B1-DNA adduct formation and mutagenicity in livers of neonatal male and female B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Sci 122:38–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sipinen V, Laubenthal J, Baumgartner A et al (2010) In vitro evaluation of baseline and induced DNA damage in human sperm exposed to benzo[a]pyrene or its metabolite benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide, using the comet assay. Mutagenesis 25:417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dusinska M, Collins AR (2008) The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions. Mutagenesis 23:191–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubenthal J, Zlobinskaya O, Poterlowicz K et al (2012) Cigarette smoke-induced transgenerational alterations in genome stability in cord blood of human F1 offspring. FASEB J. doi:10.1096/fj.11-201194PubMedGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner A, Kurzawa-Zegota M, Laubenthal J et al (2012) Comet-assay parameters as rapid biomarkers of exposure to dietary/environmental compounds – an in vitro feasibility study on spermatozoa and lymphocytes. Mutat Res 743:25–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostling O, Johanson KJ (1984) Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 123:291–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR et al (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175:184–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive PL, Banath JP, Durand RE (1990) Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the “comet” assay. Radiat Res 122:86–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D et al (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35:206–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertini RJ, Anderson D, Douglas GR et al (2000) IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Mutat Res 463:111–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar