Cultivation of Limbal Epithelial Cells on Electrospun Poly (lactide-co-glycolide) Scaffolds for Delivery to the Cornea

  • Pallavi Deshpande
  • Charanya Ramachandran
  • Virender S. Sangwan
  • Sheila MacNeil
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1014)

Abstract

In delivering tissues to the body, both natural and synthetic materials have been used. Currently, a natural membrane, the human amniotic membrane (AM), is used to deliver limbal epithelial cells (LEC) to the cornea. AM presents inherent problems with structural variation and requires extensive serological screening before use. Therefore alternatives are required to improve the predictability in clinical outcomes and economic costs associated with the use of this biological substrate. In this chapter, we describe the development of an alternative, structurally simple, synthetic biodegradable electrospun scaffold based on poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA: materials used in dissolvable sutures) to replace AM.

Key words

Electrospinning Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Limbal epithelial cell cultivation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work has been funded by the Wellcome Trust Affordable Healthcare in India Award.

References

  1. 1.
    Gomes JAP, dos Santos MS, Cunha MC, Mascaro VL, Barros Jde N, de Sousa LB (2003) Amniotic membrane transplantation for partial and total limbal stem cell deficiency secondary to chemical burn. Ophthalmology 110:466–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sridhar MS, Bansal AK, Sangwan VS, Rao GN (2000) Amniotic membrane transplantation in acute chemical and thermal injury. Am J Ophthalmol 130:134–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sangwan VS, Basu S, MacNeil S, Balasubramanian D (2012) Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET): a novel surgical technique for the treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 96:931–934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kubo M, Sonoda Y, Muramatsu R, Usui M (2001) Immunogenicity of human amniotic membrane in experimental xenotransplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1539–1546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adinolfi M, Akle CA, McColl I, Fensom AH, Tansley L, Connolly P et al (1982) Expression of HLA antigens, beta 2-microglobulin and enzymes by human amniotic epithelial cells. Nature 295:325–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endo K, Nakamura T, Kawasaki S, Kinoshita S (2004) Human amniotic membrane, like corneal epithelial basement membrane, manifests the alpha5 chain of type IV collagen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1771–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meller D, Pires RTF, Tseng SCG (2002) Ex vivo preservation and expansion of human limbal epithelial stem cells on amniotic membrane cultures. Br J Ophthalmol 86:463–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grueterich M, Espana EM, Tseng SCG (2003) Ex vivo expansion of limbal epithelial stem cells: amniotic membrane serving as a stem cell niche. Surv Ophthalmol 48:631–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sangwan VS, Basu S (2011) Antimicrobial properties of amniotic membrane. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Ohashi Y, Tsubota K (2001) Antiinflammatory effects of amniotic membrane transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Cornea 20:408–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hao Y, Ma DHK, Hwang DG, Kim WS, Zhang F (2000) Identification of antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea 19:348–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sangwan VS, Basu S, Vemuganti GK, Sejpal K, Subramaniam SV, Bandyopadhyay S et al (2011) Clinical outcomes of xeno-free autologous cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation: a 10-year study. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1525–1529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hopkinson A, McIntosh RS, Tighe PJ, James DK, Dua HS (2006) Amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction: donor variations and the effect of handling on TGF-beta ­content. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4316–4322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fatima A, Sangwan V, Iftekhar G, Reddy P, Matalia H, Balasubramanian D et al (2006) Technique of cultivating limbal derived corneal epithelium on human amniotic membrane for clinical transplantation. J Postgrad Med 52:257–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deshpande P, Notara M, Bullett N, Daniels JT, Haddow DB, MacNeil S (2009) Development of a surface-modified contact lens for the transfer of cultured limbal epithelial cells to the cornea for ocular surface diseases. Tissue Eng Part A 15:2889–2902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deshpande P, McKean R, Blackwood KA, Senior RA, Ogunbanjo A, Ryan AJ et al (2010) Using poly(lactide-co-glycolide) electrospun scaffolds to deliver cultured epithelial cells to the cornea. Regen Med 5:395–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fiorica C, Senior RA, Pitarresi G, Palumbo FS, Giammona G, Deshpande P et al (2011) Biocompatible hydrogels based on hyaluronic acid cross-linked with a polyaspartamide derivative as delivery systems for epithelial limbal cells. Int J Pharm 414:104–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sudha B, Madhavan H, Sitalakshmi G, Malathi J, Krishnakumar S, Mori Y et al (2006) Cultivation of human corneal limbal stem cells in mebiol gel® - a thermo-reversible gelation polymer. Indian J Med Res 124:655–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pino CJ, Haselton FR, Chang MS (2005) Seeding of corneal wounds by epithelial cell transfer from micropatterned PDMS contact lenses. Cell Transplant 14:565–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pallavi Deshpande
    • 1
  • Charanya Ramachandran
    • 2
  • Virender S. Sangwan
    • 2
  • Sheila MacNeil
    • 1
  1. 1.The Kroto Research InstituteUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.Sudhakar and Sreekanth Ravi stem cell laboratoryL V Prasad Eye InstituteHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations