Linking RNA Measurements and Proteomics with Genome-Scale Models

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 985)

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GMMs) have been recognized as being powerful tools for capturing system-wide metabolic phenomena and connecting those phenomena to underlying genetic and regulatory changes. By formalizing and codifying the relationship between the levels of gene expression, protein concentration, and reaction flux, metabolic models are able to translate changes in gene expression to their effects on the metabolic network. A number of methods are then available to interpret how those changes are manifest in the metabolic flux distribution. In addition to discussing how gene expression datasets can be interpreted in the context of a metabolic model, this chapter discusses two of the most common methods for analyzing the resulting metabolic network.

The chapter begins by demonstrating how a typical microarray dataset can be processed for incorporation into a GMM of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Once the expression states of the reactions in the model are available, the method of directly trimming the metabolic model by removing or constraining reactions with low expression states is demonstrated. This is the simplest and most direct approach to interpret gene expression states, but it is prone to overvaluing the effects of down regulation and it can propagate false negative errors. We therefore also include a more advanced method that uses a mixed-integer linear programming optimization to find a flux distribution that maximizes agreement with global gene expression states. Sample MATLAB code for use with the COBRA toolbox is provided for all methods used.

Key words

Genome-scale metabolic models Transcriptomics Proteomics COBRA toolbox Systems biology Constraint-based modeling Flux balance analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Oberhardt MA, Palsson BØ, Papin JA (2009) Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions. Mol Syst Biol 5:320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akesson M, Förster J, Nielsen J (2004) Integration of gene expression data into genome-scale metabolic models. Metab Eng 6(4):285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shlomi T, Cabili MN, Herrgard MJ, Palsson BØ, Ruppin E (2008) Network-based prediction of human tissue-specific metabolism. Nat Biotechnol 26(9):1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gowen CM, Fong SS (2010) Genome-scale metabolic model integrated with RNAseq data to identify metabolic states of Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol J 5(7):759–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yizhak K, Benyamini T, Liebermeister W, Ruppin E, Shlomi T (2010) Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model. Bioinformatics 26(12):i255–i260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dikicioglu D, Karabekmez E, Rash B, Pir P, Kirdar B, Oliver SG (2011) How yeast re-programmes its transcriptional profile in response to different nutrient impulses. BMC Syst Biol 5(1):148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mo ML, Palsson BO, Herrgård MJ (2009) Connecting extracellular metabolomic measurements to intracellular flux states in yeast. BMC Syst Biol 3:37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahadevan R (2003) The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. Metab Eng 5(4):264–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fu X et al (2009) Estimating accuracy of RNA-Seq and microarrays with proteomics. BMC Genomics 10:161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Life Science EngineeringVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations