A Tripartite Fusion System for the Selection of Protein Variants with Increased Stability In Vivo

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 978)

Abstract

We describe here a genetic selection system that directly links protein stability to antibiotic resistance, allowing one to directly select for mutations that stabilize proteins in vivo. Our technique is based on a tripartite fusion in which the protein to be stabilized is inserted into the middle of the reporter protein β-lactamase via a flexible linker. The gene encoding the inserted protein is then mutagenized using error-prone PCR and the resulting plasmid library plated on media supplemented with increasing concentrations of β-lactam antibiotic. Mutations that stabilize the protein of interest can easily be identified on the basis of their increased antibiotic resistance compared to cells expressing the unmutated tripartite fusion.

Key words

Genetic selection Protein stability Protein evolution Mutagenesis Reporter protein Tripartite fusion Sandwich fusion 

References

  1. 1.
    Privalov PL, Khechinashvili NN (1974) A thermodynamic approach to the problem of stabilization of globular protein structure: a calorimetric study. J Mol Biol 86:665–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giver L, Gershenson A, Freskgard PO, Arnold FH (1998) Directed evolution of a thermostable esterase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:12809–12813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taverna DM, Goldstein RA (2002) Why are proteins marginally stable? Proteins 46:105–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guo HH, Choe J, Loeb LA (2004) Protein tolerance to random amino acid change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:9205–9210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soskine M, Tawfik DS (2010) Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions. Nat Rev Genet 11:572–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghaemmaghami S, Oas TG (2001) Quantitative protein stability measurement in vivo. Nat Struct Biol 8:879–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ignatova Z, Gierasch LM (2004) Monitoring protein stability and aggregation in vivo by real-time fluorescent labeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:523–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer S, Rudiger S, Ang HC, Joerger AC, Fersht AR (2007) Correlation of levels of folded recombinant p53 in Escherichia coli with thermodynamic stability in vitro. J Mol Biol 372:268–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barakat NH, Carmody LJ, Love JJ (2007) Exploiting elements of transcriptional machinery to enhance protein stability. J Mol Biol 366:103–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chautard H, Blas-Galindo E, Menguy T, Grand’Moursel L, Cava F, Berenguer J, Delcourt M (2007) An activity-independent selection system of thermostable protein variants. Nat Methods 4:919–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waldo GS (2003) Improving protein folding efficiency by directed evolution using the GFP folding reporter. Methods Mol Biol 230:343–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foit L, Morgan GJ, Kern MJ, Steimer LR, von Hacht AA, Titchmarsh J, Warriner SL, Radford SE, Bardwell JC (2009) Optimizing protein stability in vivo. Mol Cell 36:861–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delaire M, Lenfant F, Labia R, Masson JM (1991) Site-directed mutagenesis on TEM-1 beta-lactamase: role of Glu166 in catalysis and substrate binding. Protein Eng 4:805–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hallet B, Sherratt DJ, Hayes F (1997) Pentapeptide scanning mutagenesis: random insertion of a variable five amino acid cassette in a target protein. Nucleic Acids Res 25:1866–1867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zebala J, Barany F (1991) Mapping catalytically important regions of an enzyme using two-codon insertion mutagenesis: a case study correlating beta-lactamase mutants with the three-dimensional structure. Gene 100:51–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galarneau A, Primeau M, Trudeau L-E, Michnick SW (2002) [beta]-Lactamase protein fragment complementation assays as in vivo and in vitro sensors of protein-protein interactions. Nat Biotechnol 20:619–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foit L, Mueller-Schickert A, Mamathambika BS, Gleiter S, Klaska CL, Ren G, Bardwell JC (2011) Genetic selection for enhanced folding in vivo targets the Cys14-Cys38 disulfide bond in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Antioxid Redox Signal 14:973–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quan S, Koldewey P, Tapley T, Kirsch N, Ruane KM, Pfizenmaier J, Shi R, Hofmann S, Foit L, Ren G, Jakob U, Xu Z, Cygler M, Bardwell JC (2011) Genetic selection designed to stabilize proteins uncovers a chaperone called Spy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:262–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gleiter S, Bardwell JC (2008) Disulfide bond isomerization in prokaryotes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783:530–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watson N (1988) A new revision of the sequence of plasmid pBR322. Gene 70:399–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bolivar F, Rodriguez RL, Greene PJ, Betlach MC, Heyneker HL, Boyer HW, Crosa JH, Falkow S (1977) Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. II. A multipurpose cloning system. Gene 2:95–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guzman LM, Belin D, Carson MJ, Beckwith J (1995) Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol 177:4121–4130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miyazaki K (2003) Creating random mutagenesis libraries by megaprimer PCR of whole plasmid (MEGAWHOP). Methods Mol Biol 231:23–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miyazaki K (2011) MEGAWHOP cloning: a method of creating random mutagenesis libraries via megaprimer PCR of whole plasmids. Methods Enzymol 498:399–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Labrou NE (2010) Random mutagenesis methods for in vitro directed enzyme evolution. Curr Protein Pept Sci 11:91–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rasila TS, Pajunen MI, Savilahti H (2009) Critical evaluation of random mutagenesis by error-prone polymerase chain reaction protocols, Escherichia coli mutator strain, and hydroxylamine treatment. Anal Biochem 388:71–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wong TS, Roccatano D, Zacharias M, Schwaneberg U (2006) A statistical analysis of random mutagenesis methods used for directed protein evolution. J Mol Biol 355:858–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chusacultanachai S, Yuthavong Y (2004) Random mutagenesis strategies for construction of large and diverse clone libraries of mutated DNA fragments. Methods Mol Biol 270:319–334PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Howard Hughes Medical InstituteChevy ChaseUSA
  2. 2.Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations