Advertisement

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Techniques to Study Ligand-Mediated Interactions of PPARs with Coregulators

  • Nico Mitro
  • Cristina Godio
  • Maurizio CrestaniEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 952)

Abstract

The capacity to induce the association of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) with different transcriptional coregulators is determined by the peculiar 3D-structure that the receptors adopt when bound with a specific ligand. The fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay is a technique widely used to evaluate coregulator recruitment to nuclear receptors induced by ligands. With this assay it is possible to quantitatively determine the interaction and the affinity of coregulators with PPARs when these receptors are complexed with ligands. Here, we describe the use of this technique to assess the preferential interaction and the affinity of PPARγ with coregulators as a function of the chemical structure of the bound ligand.

Key words

Nuclear receptors Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors Coactivators Corepressors Protein–protein interaction Fluorescence resonance energy transfer 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by grants from the European Commission (LSHM-CT2006-037498), the Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Career Development Award and the Cariplo Foundation (2008.2511 and 2009.2727). We are grateful to Miss Elda Desiderio Pinto for invaluable administrative support.

References

  1. 1.
    Hermanson O, Glass C, Rosenfeld M (2002) Nuclear receptor coregulators: multiple modes of modification. Trends Endocrinol Metab 13:55–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nettles KW, Greene GL (2005) Ligand control of coregulator recruitment to nuclear receptors. Ann Review Physiol 67:309–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenfeld MG, Lunyak VV, Glass CK (2006) Sensors and signals: a coactivator/corepressor/epigenetic code for integrating signal-dependent programs of transcriptional response. Genes Dev 20:1405–1428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pochetti G, Godio C, Mitro N et al (2007) Insights into the mechanism of partial agonism: crystal structures of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand-binding domainin the complex with two enatiomeric ligands. J Biol Chem 282:17314–17324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pochetti G, Mitro N, Lavecchia A et al (2010) Structural insight into peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma binding of two ureidofibrate-like enantiomers by molecular dynamics, cofactor interaction analysis, and site-directed mutagenesis. J Med Chem 53:4354–4366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu J, Knappenberger K, Kack H et al (2003) A homogeneous in vitro functional assay for estrogen receptors: coactivator recruitment. Mol Endocrinol 17:346–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darimont BD, Wagner R, Apriletti J et al (1998) Structure and specificity of nuclear receptor-coactivator interactions. Genes Dev 12:3343–3356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio “Giovanni Galli” di Biochimica e Biologia Molecolare del Metabolismo-Spettrometria di Massa, Dipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e BiomolecolariUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Chemical PhysiologyThe Scripps Research InstituteLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations