Abstract
Sperm morphology is an important measure of testicular health, spermiation, and fertility potential. The World Health Organization (WHO) Semen Manuals advocate different sperm morphology schemes, but, like the schemes themselves, do not describe classification sequence or rules that can be unambiguously applied in a standard method. Our novel dichotomous key provides a rational decision framework for a sperm morphology classification algorithm. Classification order hierarchy is standardized and sperm characteristics are defined. Normal morphology is derived after eliminating abnormal and borderline normal forms. By defining and categorizing borderline normal forms separately from either normal or abnormal, the method can simultaneously produce results for Strict and traditional morphology schemes as adopted by different versions of the WHO Semen Manuals. The algorithm can be used for “recalibration” to a less stringent and potentially more relevant standard of normal, while reducing shift, drift, and variation in classification within and among analysts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
World Health Organisation (1980) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions. Press Concern, Singapore
World Health Organisation (1987) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions, 2nd edn. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
World Health Organisation (1992) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
World Health Organisation (1999) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
World Health Organisation (2010) Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Mortimer D, Menkveld R (2001) Sperm morphology assessment—historical perspectives and current opinions. J Androl 22:192–205
Eliasson R (2003) Basic semen analysis. In: Matson P (ed) Current topics in andrology. Ladybrook Publishing, Perth, pp 35–89
Handelsman DJ, Cooper TG (2010) Afterword to semen analysis in 21st century medicine special issue. Asian J Androl 12:118–123
Menkveld R et al (1990) The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 5:586–592
Menkveld R et al (1991) Atlas of human sperm morphology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD
Kruger TF et al (1988) Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 49:112–117
Amann RP (2010) Tests to measure the quality of spermatozoa at spermiation. Asian J Androl 12:71–78
Menkveld R (2010) Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Asian J Androl 12:47–58
Brazil C (2010) Practical semen analysis: from A to Z. Asian J Androl 12:14–20
Horte A et al (2001) Reassessment of sperm morphology of archival semen smears from the period 1980–1994. Int J Androl 24:120–124
Hughes PM et al (2009) Sperm morphology and intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcome then and now: when morphology mattered. Fertil Steril 92(3):S73
Morbeck DE et al (2011) Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications. Fertil Steril 96:1350–1354
Prinosilova P et al (2009) Selectivity of hyaluronic acid binding for spermatozoa with normal Tygerberg strict morphology. Reprod Biomed Online 18:177–183
Kinzer DR et al (1998) Sperm morphology analysis problems as demonstrated by proficiency testing. J Androl 19:54
Keel BA et al (2000) Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrology. Hum Reprod 15:680–686
Cooper TG et al (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 16:231–245
Winston J (2009) Describing species. Columbia University Press, New York, NY
Kruger TF, Franken DR (2004) Atlas of sperm morphology. Taylor and Francis, London
Rothmann SA et al (2012) Sperm morphology: a rational method for classification. Fertility Solutions, Cleveland, OH
Katz DF (1991) Human sperm as biomarkers of toxic risk and reproductive health. J NIH Res 3:63–67
Vanderzwalmen P et al (2008) Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online 17:617–627
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Rothmann, S.A., Bort, AM., Quigley, J., Pillow, R. (2013). Sperm Morphology Classification: A Rational Method for Schemes Adopted by the World Health Organization. In: Carrell, D., Aston, K. (eds) Spermatogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 927. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-037-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-038-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols