Sperm Morphology Classification: A Rational Method for Schemes Adopted by the World Health Organization

  • Susan A. Rothmann
  • Anna-Marie Bort
  • John Quigley
  • Robin Pillow
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 927)

Abstract

Sperm morphology is an important measure of testicular health, spermiation, and fertility potential. The World Health Organization (WHO) Semen Manuals advocate different sperm morphology schemes, but, like the schemes themselves, do not describe classification sequence or rules that can be unambiguously applied in a standard method. Our novel dichotomous key provides a rational decision framework for a sperm morphology classification algorithm. Classification order hierarchy is standardized and sperm characteristics are defined. Normal morphology is derived after eliminating abnormal and borderline normal forms. By defining and categorizing borderline normal forms separately from either normal or abnormal, the method can simultaneously produce results for Strict and traditional morphology schemes as adopted by different versions of the WHO Semen Manuals. The algorithm can be used for “recalibration” to a less stringent and potentially more relevant standard of normal, while reducing shift, drift, and variation in classification within and among analysts.

Key words

Sperm morphology Sperm classification Dichotomous key Algorithm World Health Organization WHO Borderline normal sperm Strict morphology Semen analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organisation (1980) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions. Press Concern, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organisation (1987) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions, 2nd edn. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Health Organisation (1992) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organisation (1999) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organisation (2010) Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mortimer D, Menkveld R (2001) Sperm morphology assessment—historical perspectives and current opinions. J Androl 22:192–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eliasson R (2003) Basic semen analysis. In: Matson P (ed) Current topics in andrology. Ladybrook Publishing, Perth, pp 35–89Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Handelsman DJ, Cooper TG (2010) Afterword to semen analysis in 21st century medicine special issue. Asian J Androl 12:118–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menkveld R et al (1990) The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 5:586–592PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Menkveld R et al (1991) Atlas of human sperm morphology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kruger TF et al (1988) Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 49:112–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amann RP (2010) Tests to measure the quality of spermatozoa at spermiation. Asian J Androl 12:71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Menkveld R (2010) Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Asian J Androl 12:47–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brazil C (2010) Practical semen analysis: from A to Z. Asian J Androl 12:14–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horte A et al (2001) Reassessment of sperm morphology of archival semen smears from the period 1980–1994. Int J Androl 24:120–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hughes PM et al (2009) Sperm morphology and intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcome then and now: when morphology mattered. Fertil Steril 92(3):S73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morbeck DE et al (2011) Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications. Fertil Steril 96:1350–1354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prinosilova P et al (2009) Selectivity of hyaluronic acid binding for spermatozoa with normal Tygerberg strict morphology. Reprod Biomed Online 18:177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kinzer DR et al (1998) Sperm morphology analysis problems as demonstrated by proficiency testing. J Androl 19:54Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keel BA et al (2000) Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrology. Hum Reprod 15:680–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cooper TG et al (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 16:231–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winston J (2009) Describing species. Columbia University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kruger TF, Franken DR (2004) Atlas of sperm morphology. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rothmann SA et al (2012) Sperm morphology: a rational method for classification. Fertility Solutions, Cleveland, OHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz DF (1991) Human sperm as biomarkers of toxic risk and reproductive health. J NIH Res 3:63–67Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vanderzwalmen P et al (2008) Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online 17:617–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan A. Rothmann
    • 1
  • Anna-Marie Bort
    • 1
  • John Quigley
    • 1
  • Robin Pillow
    • 1
  1. 1.Fertility Solutions IncClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations