DNA Repair Protocols pp 393-415

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 920)

Studying Repair of a Single Protein-Bound Nick In Vivo Using the Flp-Nick System

Protocol

Abstract

The Flp-nick system is a simple in vivo system developed for studying the cellular responses to a protein-bound nick at a single genomic site in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Flp-nick system takes advantage of a mutant Flp recombinase that can introduce a nick at a specific Flp recombinase recognition target (FRT) site, which has been integrated into the yeast genome. Upon cleavage at the FRT site, the Flp mutant becomes covalently linked to the 3′ DNA end at the nick in an irreversible manner, as the mutant fails to accomplish the required religation process. Thus, the established damage mimics a stabilized topoisomerase I-DNA cleavage complex. DNA topoisomerases are ubiquitous enzymes that relieve topological stress in the DNA arising during DNA replication or transcription. During this process, they make transient enzyme-DNA cleavage complexes, which normally are reversed by a rapid ligation step. However, aberrant long-lived enzyme-DNA complexes may occur frequently due to either endogenous or exogenous damage, and the cellular repair machinery therefore needs to be able to eliminate this type of damage. This chapter describes how to establish the Flp-nick system in S. cerevisiae, how to detect FlpH305L at the FRT site using a modified chromatin immunoprecipitation assay where formaldehyde fixation is omitted, and how to monitor nicking at the FRT site by alkaline denaturing gel analysis.

Key words

Flp recombinase Topoisomerase I-DNA cleavage complexes Double-strand break repair Protein-DNA adduct Single-strand break 

References

  1. 1.
    Nielsen I, Bentsen IB, Lisby M, Hansen S, Mundbjerg K, Andersen AH, Bjergbaek L (2009) A Flp-nick system to study repair of a single protein-bound nick in vivo. Nat Methods 6:753–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Volkert FC, Broach JR (1986) Site-specific recombination promotes plasmid amplification in yeast. Cell 46:541–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones JR, Shelton KD, Magnuson MA (2005) Strategies for the use of site-specific recombinases in genome engineering. Methods Mol Med 103:245–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andrews BJ, Proteau GA, Beatty LG, Sadowski PD (1985) The FLP recombinase of the 2 micron circle DNA of yeast: interaction with its target sequences. Cell 40:795–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen JW, Lee J, Jayaram M (1992) DNA cleavage in trans by the active site tyrosine during Flp recombination: switching protein partners before exchanging strands. Cell 69:647–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen JW, Yang SH, Jayaram M (1993) Tests for the fractional active-site model in Flp site-specific recombination. Assembly of a functional recombination complex in half-site and full-site strand transfer. J Biol Chem 268:14417–14425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee J, Jayaram M, Grainge I (1999) Wild-type Flp recombinase cleaves DNA in trans. EMBO J 18:784–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qian XH, Inman RB, Cox MM (1990) Protein-based asymmetry and protein-protein interactions in FLP recombinase-mediated site- specific recombination. J Biol Chem 265:21779–21788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Voziyanov Y, Lee J, Whang I, Lee J, Jayaram M (1996) Analyses of the first chemical step in Flp site-specific recombination: synapsis may not be a pre-requisite for strand cleavage. J Mol Biol 256:720–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pommier Y, Redon C, Rao VA, Seiler JA, Sordet O, Takemura H, Antony S, Meng L, Liao Z, Kohlhagen G et al (2003) Repair of and checkpoint response to topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. Mutat Res 532:173–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parsons RL, Prasad PV, Harshey RM, Jayaram M (1988) Step-arrest mutants of FLP recombinase: implications for the catalytic mechanism of DNA recombination. Mol Cell Biol 8:3303–3310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsalik EL, Gartenberg MR (1998) Curing Saccharomyces cerevisiae of the 2 micron plasmid by targeted DNA damage. Yeast 14:847–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Longtine MS, McKenzie A 3rd, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ida Nielsen
    • 1
  • Anni H. Andersen
    • 1
  • Lotte Bjergbæk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Biology and GeneticsUniversity of AarhusAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations