Advertisement

Monitoring DNA Recombination Initiated by HO Endonuclease

  • Neal Sugawara
  • James E. HaberEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 920)

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) have proven to be very potent initiators of recombination in yeast and other organisms. A single, site-specific DSB initiates homologous DNA repair events such as gene conversion, break-induced replication, and single-strand annealing, as well as nonhomologous end joining, microhomology-mediated end joining, and new telomere addition. When repair is either delayed or prevented, a single DSB can trigger checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest. In budding yeast, expressing the HO endonuclease under the control of a galactose-inducible promoter has been instrumental in the study of these processes by providing us a way to synchronously induce a DSB at a unique site in vivo. We describe how the HO endonuclease has been used to study the recombination events in mating-type (MAT) switching. Southern blots provide an overview of the process by allowing one to examine the formation of the DSB, DNA degradation at the break, and formation of the product. Denaturing gels and slot blots as well as PCR have provided important tools to follow the progression of resection in wild-type and mutant cells. PCR has also been important in allowing us to follow the kinetics of certain recombination intermediates such as the initiation of repair DNA synthesis or the removal of nonhomologous Y sequences during MAT switching. Finally chromatin immunoprecipitation has been used to follow the recruitment of key proteins to the DSB and in subsequent steps in DSB repair.

Key words

HO Meganuclease Recombination Double-strand break Gene conversion Mating-type switch Chromatin immunoprecipitation 

References

  1. 1.
    Pâques F, Haber JE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:349–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jensen R, Sprague GF, Herskowitz I (1983) Regulation of yeast mating-type interconversion: feedback control of HO gene expression by the mating-type locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80:3035–3039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen RE, Herskowitz I (1984) Directionality and regulation of cassette substitution in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 49:97–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaplun L, Ivantsiv Y, Bakhrat A, Raveh D (2003) DNA damage response-mediated degradation of HO endonuclease via the ubiquitin system involves its nuclear export. J Biol Chem 278:48727–48734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haber JE (1998) Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet 32:561–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ira G, Satory D, Haber JE (2006) Conservative inheritance of newly synthesized DNA in double-strand break-induced gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol 26:9424–9429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivanov EL, Sugawara N, White CI, Fabre F, Haber JE (1994) Mutations in XRS2 and RAD50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 14:3414–3425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sugawara N, Haber JE (1992) Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol 12:563–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    White CI, Haber JE (1990) Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 9:663–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hicks WM, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE (2011) Real-time analysis of double-strand DNA break repair by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3108–3115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collas P (2009) The state-of-the-art of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Methods Mol Biol 567:1–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X, Haber JE (2004) Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biol 2:E21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sugawara N, Wang X, Haber JE (2003) In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol Cell 12:209–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolner B, van Komen S, Sung P, Peterson CL (2003) Recruitment of the recombinational repair machinery to a DNA double-strand break in yeast. Mol Cell 12:221–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herskowitz I, Jensen RE (1991) Putting the HO gene to work: practical uses for mating-type switching. Methods Enzymol 194:132–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nickoloff JA, Singer JD, Hoekstra MF, Heffron F (1989) Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair. J Mol Biol 207:527–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sandell LL, Zakian VA (1993) Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75:729–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boeke JD, Trueheart J, Natsoulis G, Fink GR (1987) 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol 154:164–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kostriken R, Strathern JN, Klar AJ, Hicks JB, Heffron F (1983) A site-specific endonuclease essential for mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 35:167–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ray BL, White CI, Haber JE (1991) Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the “stuck” mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11:5372–5380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pâques F, Haber JE (1997) Two pathways for removal of nonhomologous DNA ends during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 17:6765–6771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cortes-Ledesma F, Aguilera A (2006) Double-strand breaks arising by replication through a nick are repaired by cohesin-dependent sister-chromatid exchange. EMBO Rep 7:919–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Evans IH, Wilkie D (1976) Mitochondrial factors in the utilization of sugars in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet Res 27:89–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mahler HR, Wilkie D (1978) Mitochondrial control of sugar utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plasmid 1:125–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Church GM, Gilbert W (1984) Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81:1991–1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Melton DA, Krieg PA, Rebagliati MR, Maniatis T, Zinn K, Green MR (1984) Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 12:7035–7056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1984) A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Addendum. Anal Biochem 137:266–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, Arbel-Eden A, Foiani M, Haber JE (2002) Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell 10:373–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wach A, Brachat A, Pohlmann R, Philippsen P (1994) New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793–1808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA
  2. 2.Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research CenterBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations