High-Throughput Phenotyping in Plants pp 311-325

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 918)

High-Throughput Monitoring of Plant Nuclear DNA Contents Via Flow Cytometry

Protocol

Abstract

Interest in measuring the nuclear holoploid genome sizes of higher plants reflects not just the status of the nucleus as a defining characteristic of eukaryotic organisms. Higher plants also attract interest in that they display an unusually large range of genome sizes, current measurements indicating an almost 2,500-fold difference between the smallest and the largest. Scientists would like to learn more about the significance of nuclear genome sizes, in terms of molecular and cytological mechanisms regulating the interaction of the nucleus with the cytoplasm and regulating the observed increases and decreases of genome sizes observed within and across families, genera, and species. We would like to understand their adaptive significance through charting their distribution within populations and ecosystems. Further, since genome size values are only available for a small minority of the ∼650,000 species of angiosperms (known and yet undiscovered), we would like to systematically survey plant genome sizes globally before their extinction as a consequence of anthropogenic change. Flow cytometry is accepted as the method of choice for genome size measurements, these measurements being based on fluorescent staining of the nuclear DNA. Flow cytometry offers exceptional ease of use, accompanied by high accuracy and reproducibility and low cost. This chapter provides a general discussion of flow cytometric methods for measuring plant genome sizes, and detailed methods for carrying out these analyses.

Key words:

Plants Genome sizing Nucleus Flow cytometry 

References

  1. 1.
    Gregory TR (2005) The C-value enigma in plants and animals: a review of parallels and an appeal for partnership. Ann Bot 95:133–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greilhuber J, Borsch T, Müller K, Worberg A, Porembski S, Barthlott W (2006) Smallest angiosperm genomes found in Lentibulariaceae, with chromosomes of bacterial size. Plant Biol 8:770–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pellicer J, Fay MF, Leitch IJ (2010) The largest eukaryotic genome of them all? Bot J Linn Soc 164:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2011) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann Bot 107:467–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michaelson MJ, Price HJ, Ellison JR, Johnston JS (1991) Comparison of plant DNA contents determined by Feulgen microspectrophotometry and laser flow cytometry. Am J Bot 78:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Praça-Fontes MM, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR (2011) C-value reassessment of plant standards: an image cytometry approach. Plant Cell Rep. doi:10.1007/s00299-011-1135-6
  7. 7.
    Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JR, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galbraith DW (2009) Simultaneous flow cytometric quantification of plant nuclear DNA contents over the full range of described angiosperm 2 C values. Cytometry 75A:692–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galbraith DW, Bennetzen JL, Kellogg EA, Pires JC, Soltis PS (2011) The genomes of all angiosperms: a call for a coordinated global census. J Bot. doi:10.1155/2011/646198
  10. 10.
    Shapiro HM (2003) Practical flow cytometry, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bell PR, Helmsley AR (2000) Green plants: their origin and diversity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galbraith DW, Bartos J, Dolezel J (2005) Flow cytometry and cell sorting in plant biotechnology. In: Sklar LA (ed) Flow cytometry in biotechnology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnston JS, Bennett MD, Rayburn AL, Galbraith DW, Price HJ (1999) Reference standards for determination of DNA content of plant nuclei. Am J Bot 86:609–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greilhuber J, Dolezel J (2009) 2 C or not 2 C: a closer look at cell nuclei and their DNA content. Chromosoma 118:391–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dolezel J, Greilhuber J (2010) Nuclear genome size: are we getting closer? Cytometry 77A:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Praça-Fontes MM, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR, Cruz CD (2011) Revisiting the DNA C-values of the genome size-standards used in plant flow cytometry to choose the “best primary standards”. Plant Cell Rep 30:1183–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sliwinska E, Pisarczyk I, Pawlik A, Galbraith DW (2009) Measuring genome size of desert plants using dry seeds. Botany 87:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bainard JD, Husband BC, Baldwin SJ, Fazekas AJ, Gregory TR, Newmaster SG, Kron P (2011) The effects of rapid desiccation on estimates of plant genome size. Chromosome Res 19:825–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cousin A, Heel K, Cowling WA, Nelson MN (2009) An efficient high-throughput flow cytometric method for estimating DNA ploidy level in plants. Cytometry 75A:1015–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown JK, Lambert GM, Ghanim M, Czosnek H, Galbraith DW (2005) Nuclear DNA content of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Aleyrodidae: Hemiptera) estimated by flow cytometry. Bull Entomol Res 95:309–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Plant SciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations