Advertisement

Identification of Cooked Bone Using TEM Imaging of Bone Collagen

  • Hannah E. C. KoonEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 915)

Abstract

Mild heating (≤100° C, 1 h)—typical of cooking—does not lead to detectable changes in any biochemical parameter yet measured; consequently bones that have been cooked, but which have not reached a temperature that will induce charring go undetected. We have used a microscopy based approach to investigate changes in the organization of the bone protein, collagen, as it is heated, using bone from heating experiments, short term burials, and archaeological sites. The work has revealed that the presence of a mineral matrix stabilizes the collagen enabling the damage to accumulate, but preventing it from causing immediate gelatinization. Once the mineral is removed, the damage can be observed using appropriate visualization methods. This chapter describes the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) technique that has been used to detect cooked bone by visualizing minor heat-induced damage at the level of the collagen fibril.

Key words:

Transmission electron microscopy Bone collagen Collagen fibrils Cooked bone Heated bone Gelatinisation Positive staining 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This method has been refined over a number of years and with the help and advice from TEM technicians at Newcastle, Bradford, and York Universities. Particular thanks must go to J. Fearnley and M. Stark. The majority of the method development was supported by a NERC CASE studentship (NER/S/A/2002/12028) with the BLC Leather Technology Centre.

References

  1. 1.
    Covington AD, Song L, Suparno O, Koon HEC, Collins MJ (2008) Link-lock: an explanation of the chemical stabilisation of collagen. J Soc Leath Tech Ch 92(1):1–7Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts SJ, Smith CI, Millard A, Collins MJ (2002) The taphonomy of cooked bone: characterizing boiling and its physico-chemical effects. Archaeometry 44(3):485–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snowden JM, Weidemann JF (1978) A morphological and biochemical examination of the hydrothermal denaturation of collagen. Meat Sci 2:1–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richter J (1986) Experimental study of heat induced morphological changes in fish bone collagen. J Archaeol Sci 13(5):477–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koon HEC, Nicholson RA, Collins MJ (2003) A practical approach to the identification of low temperature heated bone using TEM. J Archaeol Sci 30(11):1393–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koon HEC, O’Connor TP, Collins MJ (2010) Sorting the butchered from the boiled. J Archaeol Sci 37(1):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Puchinger L, Leichtfried D, Stachelberger H (2002) Evaluation of old parchment collagen with the help of transmission electron microscopy. In: Larsen R (ed) Microanalysis of parchment. Archetype Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins MJ, Galley P (1998) Towards an optimal method of archaeological collagen extraction; the influence of PH and grinding. Anc Biomol 2:209–222Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BioArch, Department of BiologyUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations