DNA Barcodes pp 409-419 | Cite as

Phylogenetic Analyses of Ecological Communities Using DNA Barcode Data

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 858)

Abstract

Ecologists and conservation biologists are increasingly focusing on quantifying the phylogenetic component of biodiversity in order to inform basic and applied research. A major obstacle of this approach in tropical ecosystems has been the difficulty of generating high-quality phylogenetic trees for the vast numbers of species in these systems. Phylogenetic trees inferred from DNA barcodes hold the potential to overcome this obstacle. Here, I present a methodological framework for analyzing the phylogenetic alpha and beta diversity of ecological communities using a phylogenetic tree. The analytical approach is presented using the freely available and widely used software platform “R”.

Key words

Biodiversity Community ecology Community phylogenetics Phylogenetic beta diversity Phylogenetic diversity DNA barcode 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank John Kress and Dave Erickson for their collaboration and invitation to contribute to this volume. N.G.S. is supported by Michigan State University.

References

  1. 1.
    Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:178–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faith DP (1994) Genetic diversity and taxonomic priorities for conservation. Biol Conserv 68:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faith DP (2002) Quantifying biodiversity: a phylogenetic perspective. Conserv Biol 16:248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Webb CO (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat 156:145–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, Pither J, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK (2006) The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology 87:2418–2424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK (2007) The influence of spatial and size scales on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. Ecology 88:1770–1780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elton J (1946) Competition and the structure of ecological communities. Animal Ecol 15:54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jarvinen O (1982) Species-to-genus ratios in biogeography: a historical note. J Biogeogr 9:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Webb CO, Donoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Jones FA, Swenson NG, Perez R, Sanjur O, Bermingham E (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics pot in Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18621–18626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Swenson NG, Thompson J, Uriarte M, Zimmerman JK (2010) Improvements in the application of DNA barcodes in building a community phylogeny for tropical trees in a Puerto Rican forest dynamics plot. PLoS One 5:e15409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015409 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swenson NG (2009) Phylogenetic resolution and quantifying the phylogenetic diversity and dispersion of communities. PLoS One 4:e4390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Graham CH, Fine PVA (2008) Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. Ecol Lett 11:1265–1277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kembel SW, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP et al (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26: 1463–1464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2009) Opposing assembly mechanisms in a Neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology. Ecology 90:2161–2170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations