DNA Barcoding Methods for Land Plants
DNA barcoding in the land plants presents a number of challenges compared to DNA barcoding in many animal clades. The CO1 animal DNA barcode is not effective for plants. Plant species hybridize frequently, and there are many cases of recent speciation via mechanisms, such as polyploidy and breeding system transitions. Additionally, there are many life-history trait combinations, which combine to reduce the likelihood of a small number of markers effectively tracking plant species boundaries. Recent results, however, from the two chosen core plant DNA barcode regions rbcL and matK plus two supplementary regions trnH–psbA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (or ITS2) have demonstrated reasonable levels of species discrimination in both floristic and taxonomically focused studies. We describe sampling techniques, extraction protocols, and PCR methods for each of these two core and two supplementary plant DNA barcode regions, with extensive notes supporting their implementation for both low- and high-throughput facilities.
Key wordsDNA barcoding Plant field collecting Plant DNA extraction PCR amplification Cycle sequencing rbcL matK trnH–psbA Internal transcribed spacer
We are grateful to Michelle Hollingsworth, Alan Forrest, David Erickson, and John Kress for helpful comments on this manuscript.
- 4.Paton AJ, Brummitt N, Govaerts R, Kehan H, Hinchcliffe S, Allkin B, Lughadha EN (2008) Towards target 1 of the global strategy for plant conservation: a working list of all known plant species: progress and prospects. Taxon 57:602–611Google Scholar
- 11.Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, van den Berg C, Madriñan S, Petersen G, Seberg O, Jørgsensen T, Cameron KM, Carine M, Pedersen N, Hedderson TAJ, Conrad F, Salazar GA, Richardson JE, Hollingsworth ML, Barraclough TE, Kelly L, Wilkinson M (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56:295–299Google Scholar
- 12.Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions with species of recent origin in the Myristicaceae. Mol Ecol Notes 8:480–490Google Scholar
- 27.Colpaert N, Cavers S, Bandou E et al (2005) Sampling tissue for DNA analysis of trees: trunk cambium as an alternative to canopy leaves. Silvae Genet 54:265–269Google Scholar
- 28.Tate JA, Simpson BB (2003) Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst Bot 28:723–737Google Scholar
- 36.Fofana B, Harvengt L, Jardin P, Baudoin JP (1997) New primers for the polymerase chain amplification of cpDNA intergenic spacers in Phaseolus phylogeny. Belg J Bot 129:118–122Google Scholar
- 38.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar