Ability to manipulate the genome or design genes with desired mutation is critical for functional studies. Recombineering has made genetic manipulation of large genomic fragments very feasible and efficient. In the bacteriophage lambda-based recombineering system, three prophage genes, exo, bet, and gam, under the control of a temperature-sensitive lambda cI-repressor, provide the recombination function. The high efficiency of recombineering by oligonucleotides allows generation of subtle alterations in the bacterial chromosomal DNA as well as episomal DNA. We describe here a two-step “Hit and Fix” method, in which a short heterologous sequence is inserted to the target site first (Hit) and this sequence is replaced with the desired mutation in the second step (Fix). Insertion and replacement of the heterologous sequence allows screening of the recombinant clones by PCR or colony hybridization.
Recombineering “Hit and Fix” method Oligonucleotide Bacterial artificial chromosome Point mutation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
The research was sponsored by the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health.
Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Court DL (2001): Recombineering: a powerful new tool for mouse functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2:769–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu D, Ellis HM, Lee EC, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Court DL (2000): An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5978–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang Y, Buchholz F, Muyrers JP, Stewart AF (1998): A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 20:123–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang Y, Muyrers JP, Testa G, Stewart, AF (2000): DNA cloning by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol18:1314–1317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datta S, Costantino N, Zhou X, Court DL (2008): Identification and analysis of recombineering functions from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and their phages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1626–1631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warming S, Costantino N, Court DL, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG (2005): Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Court DL, Swaminathan S, Yu D, Wilson H, Baker T, Bubunenko M, Sawitze J, Sharan SK (2003): Mini-l: a tractable system for chromosome and BAC engineering. Gene 315:63–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datta S, Costantino N, Court, DL (2006): A set of recombineering plasmids for gram-negative bacteria Gene 379:109–115.Google Scholar
Chan W, Costantino N, Li R, Lee SC, Su Q, Melvin D, Court DL, Liu P. (2007): A recombineering based approach for high-throughput conditional knockout targeting vector construction. Nucleic Acids Res 35:e64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang Y, Sharan SK (2003): A simple two-step, ‘hit and fix’ method to generate subtle mutations in BACs using short denatured PCR fragments. Nucleic Acids Res 31:e80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaminathan S, Ellis HM, Waters LS, Yu D, Lee EC, Court DL, Sharan SK (2001): Rapid engineering of bacterial artificial chromosomes using oligonucleotides. Genesis 29:14–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis HM, Yu D, DiTizio T, Court DL (2001): High efficiency mutagenesis, repair, and engineering of chromosomal DNA using single-stranded oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6742–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar