Advertisement

Gene Synthesis pp 197-213 | Cite as

In Silico Design of Functional DNA Constructs

  • Alan Villalobos
  • Mark Welch
  • Jeremy Minshull
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 852)

Abstract

The promise of synthetic biology lies in the creation of novel function from the proper combination of genetic elements. De novo gene synthesis has become a cost-effective method for building virtually any conceptualized genetic construct, removing the constraints of extant sequences, and greatly facilitating study of the relationships between gene sequence and function. With the rapid increase in the number and variety of characterized and cataloged genetic elements, tools that facilitate assembly of such parts into functional constructs (genes, vectors, circuits, etc.) are essential. The Gene Designer software allows scientists and engineers to readily manage and recombine genetic elements into novel assemblies. It also provides tools for the simulation of molecular cloning schemes as well as the engineering and optimization of protein-coding sequences. Together, the functions in Gene Designer provide a complete capability to design functional genetic constructs.

Key words

Gene design Protein expression Synthetic biology Gene Designer Molecular cloning Molecular biology 

References

  1. 1.
    Mitchell, M. (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms, 1st MIT Press paperback ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patil, K. R., Rocha, I., Forster, J., and Nielsen, J. (2005) Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering, BMC Bioinformatics 6, 308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rocha, M., Maia, P., Mendes, R., Pinto, J. P., Ferreira, E. C., Patil, K., Nielsen, J., and Rocha, I. (2008) Natural computation meta-heuristics for the in silico optimization of microbial strains, BMC Bioinformatics 9, 499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ukkonen, E. (1995) On-line construction of suffix-trees, Algorithmica 14, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lanzer, M., and Bujard, H. (1988) Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85, 8973–8977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bujard, H., Gentz, R., Lanzer, M., Stueber, D., Mueller, M., Ibrahimi, I., Haeuptle, M. T., and Dobberstein, B. (1987) A T5 promoter-based transcription-translation system for the analysis of proteins in vitro and in vivo, Methods Enzymol 155, 416–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gentz, R., Langner, A., Chang, A. C., Cohen, S. N., and Bujard, H. (1981) Cloning and analysis of strong promoters is made possible by the downstream placement of a RNA termination signal, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78, 4936–4940.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gentz, R., and Bujard, H. (1985) Promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase selected by function: highly efficient promoters from bacteriophage T5, J Bacteriol 164, 70–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadler, J. R., Sasmor, H., and Betz, J. L. (1983) A perfectly symmetric lac operator binds the lac repressor very tightly, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80, 6785–6789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oehler, S., Amouyal, M., Kolkhof, P., von Wilcken-Bergmann, B., and Muller-Hill, B. (1994) Quality and position of the three lac operators of E. coli define efficiency of repression, EMBO J 13, 3348–3355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Welch, M., Villalobos, A., Gustafsson, C., and Minshull, J. (2009) You’re one in a googol: optimizing genes for protein expression, J R Soc Interface, 6 Suppl 4:S467–76.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kozak, M. (1986) Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83, 2850–2854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kudla, G., Murray, A. W., Tollervey, D., and Plotkin, J. B. (2009) Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli, Science 324, 255–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salis, H., Tamsir, A., and Voigt, C. (2009) Engineering bacterial signals and sensors, Contrib Microbiol 16, 194–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Smit, M. H., and van Duin, J. (1990) Secondary structure of the ribosome binding site determines translational efficiency: a quantitative analysis, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87, 7668–7672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Smit, M. H., and van Duin, J. (1994) Control of translation by mRNA secondary structure in Escherichia coli. A quantitative analysis of literature data, J Mol Biol 244, 144–150.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kozak, M. (2005) Regulation of translation via mRNA structure in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, Gene 361, 13–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Sceince+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DNA2.0, Inc.Menlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations