Advertisement

Ancient DNA pp 13-19 | Cite as

A Phenol–Chloroform Protocol for Extracting DNA from Ancient Samples

  • Ross BarnettEmail author
  • Greger Larson
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 840)

Abstract

The myriad downstream applications of ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis all ultimately require that sequence data are generated from extracts of ancient material. DNA extraction from tissues known to contain preserved biomolecules (e.g. teeth, hair, tissue, bone) relies on subtle modifications of a basic technique that has been in use for nearly two decades. Multiple DNA extraction protocols have been introduced, with varying levels of success depending on tissue type and the long-term preservation environment to which the ancient tissue was exposed. Here, we describe the phenol–chloroform method for extracting aDNA from any tissue type. This commonly employed method allows for the recovery of total nucleic acid content with minimal loss of low molecular weight double-stranded DNA.

Key words

ancient DNA extraction bone teeth hair tissue phenol chloroform 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Beth Shapiro for the opportunity to contribute this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Hagelberg E, Clegg JB (1991) Isolation and characterization of DNA from archaeological bone. Proc Biol Sci 244:45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hagelberg E, Sykes B, Hedges R (1989) Ancient bone DNA amplified. Nature 342:485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hofreiter M, Serre D, Poinar HN, Kuch M, Pääbo S (2001) Ancient DNA. Nat Rev Genet 2:353–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper A, Poinar HN (2000) Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Science 289:1139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leonard JA, Shanks O, Hofreiter M, Kreuz E, Hodges L, Ream W, Wayne RK, Fleischer RC (2007) Animal DNA in PCR reagents plagues ancient DNA research. J Archaeol Sci 34:1361–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007) Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth. Nat Protoc 2:1756–1762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Handt O, Höss M, Krings M, Pääbo S (1994) Ancient DNA: methodological challenges. Experientia 50:524–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007) Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction. Biotechniques 42:343–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poinar HN (2002) The genetic secrets some fossils hold. Acc Chem Res 35:676–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vasan S, Zhang X, Kapurnitou A, Bernhagen J, Teichberg S, Basgen J, Wagle D, Shih D, Terlecky I, Bucala R, Cerami A, Egan J, Uhlrich P (1996) An agent cleaving glucose-derived protein crosslinks in vitro and in vivo. Nature 382:275–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adler CJ, Haak W, Donlon D, Cooper A (2010) Survival and recovery of DNA from ancient teeth and bones. J Archaeol Sci 38(5):956–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilbert MTP, Wilson AS, Bunce M, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E, Shapiro B, Higham TFG, Richards MP, O’Connell TC, Tobin DJ, Janaway RC, Cooper A (2004) Ancient mitochondrial DNA from hair. Curr Biol 14:R463–R464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindahl T (1993) Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362:709–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations