Measuring Dynamic Changes in Histone Modifications and Nucleosome Density during Activated Transcription in Budding Yeast

  • Chhabi K. Govind
  • Daniel Ginsburg
  • Alan G. Hinnebusch
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 833)


Chromatin immunoprecipitation is widely utilized to determine the in vivo binding of factors that regulate transcription. This procedure entails formaldehyde-mediated cross-linking of proteins and isolation of soluble chromatin followed by shearing. The fragmented chromatin is subjected to immunoprecipitation using antibodies against the protein of interest and the associated DNA is identified using quantitative PCR. Since histones are posttranslationally modified during transcription, this technique can be effectively used to determine the changes in histone modifications that occur during transcription. In this paper, we describe a detailed methodology to determine changes in histone modifications in budding yeast that takes into account reductions in nucleosome.

Key words

Activated transcription RNA polymerase II Histone modifications Acetylation Gcn4 Gal4 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Histone acetyltransferase Histone deacetylase complexes 


  1. 1.
    Workman JL, Kingston RE (1998) Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annual Review of Biochemistry 67: 545–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williams SK, Tyler JK (2007) Transcriptional regulation by chromatin disassembly and reassembly. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 88–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li B, Carey M, Workman JL (2007) The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128: 707–719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwabish MA, Struhl K (2004) Evidence for eviction and rapid deposition of histones upon transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 24: 10111–10117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Govind CK, Zhang F, Qiu H, Hofmeyer K, Hinnebusch AG (2007) Gcn5 promotes acetylation, eviction, and methylation of nucleosomes in transcribed coding regions. Mol Cell 25: 31–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kouzarides T (2007) Chromatin Modifications and Their Function. Cell 128: 693–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Govind CK, Qiu H, Ginsburg DS, Ruan C, Hofmeyer K, et al. (2010) Phosphorylated Pol II CTD Recruits Multiple HDACs, Including Rpd3C(S), for Methylation-Dependent Deacetylation of ORF Nucleosomes. Molecular Cell 39: 234–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Govind CK, Yoon S, Qiu H, Govind S, Hinnebusch AG (2005) Simultaneous recruitment of coactivators by Gcn4p stimulates multiple steps of transcription in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 25: 5626–5638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ginsburg DS, Govind CK, Hinnebusch AG (2009) NuA4 Lysine Acetyltransferase Esa1 Is Targeted to Coding Regions and Stimulates Transcription Elongation with Gcn5. Mol Cell Biol 29: 6473–6487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selth LA, Sigurdsson S, Svejstrup JQ (2010) Transcript Elongation by RNA Polymerase II. Annual Review of Biochemistry 79: 271–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shahbazian MD, Grunstein M (2007) Functions of Site-Specific Histone Acetylation and Deacetylation. Annual Review of Biochemistry 76: 75–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carrozza MJ, Li B, Florens L, Suganuma T, Swanson SK, et al. (2005) Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription. Cell 123: 581–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keogh MC, Kurdistani SK, Morris SA, Ahn SH, Podolny V, et al. (2005) Cotranscriptional set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 recruits a repressive Rpd3 complex. Cell 123: 593–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim T, Buratowski S (2009) Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions. Cell 137: 259–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith E, Shilatifard A (2010) The Chromatin Signaling Pathway: Diverse Mechanisms of Recruitment of Histone-Modifying Enzymes and Varied Biological Outcomes. Molecular Cell 40: 689–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee C-K, Shibata Y, Rao B, Strahl BD, Lieb JD (2004) Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide. Nat Genet 36: 900–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sekinger EA, Moqtaderi Z, Struhl K (2005) Intrinsic Histone-DNA Interactions and Low Nucleosome Density Are Important for Preferential Accessibility of Promoter Regions in Yeast. Molecular Cell 18: 735–748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuo M-H, Allis CD (1999) In Vivo Cross-Linking and Immunoprecipitation for Studying Dynamic Protein:DNA Associations in a Chromatin Environment. Methods 19: 425–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chhabi K. Govind
    • 1
  • Daniel Ginsburg
    • 2
  • Alan G. Hinnebusch
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesOakland UniversityRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical SciencesLong Island UniversityBrookvilleUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory of Gene Regulation and DevelopmentEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations