Advertisement

Analysis of Stable and Transient Protein–Protein Interactions

  • Stephanie Byrum
  • Sherri K. Smart
  • Signe Larson
  • Alan J. Tackett
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 833)

Abstract

The assembly of proteins into defined complexes drives a plethora of cellular activities. These protein complexes often have a set of more stably interacting proteins as well as more unstable or transient interactions. Studying the in vivo components of these protein complexes is challenging as many of the techniques used for isolation result in the purification of only the most stable components and the transient interactions are lost. A technology called transient isotopic differentiation of interactions as random or targeted (transient I-DIRT) has been developed to identify these transiently interacting proteins as well as the stable interactions. Described here are the detailed methodological approaches used for a transient I-DIRT analysis of a multi-subunit complex, NuA3, that acetylates histone H3 and functions to activate gene transcription. Transcription is known to involve a concert of protein assemblies performing different activities on the chromatin/gene template, thus understanding the less stable or transient protein interactions with NuA3 will shed light onto the protein complexes that function synergistically, or antagonistically, to regulate gene transcription and chromatin remodeling.

Key words

Chromatin Protein–protein interactions Mass spectrometry Affinity purification Isotope-labeling I-DIRT 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by NIH grants P20RR015569, P20RR016460, and R01DA025755.

References

  1. 1.
    Smart, S. K., Mackintosh, S. G., Edmondson, R. D., Taverna, S. D., and Tackett, A. J. (2009) Mapping the local protein interactome of the NuA3 histone acetyltransferase. Protein Sci. 18, 1987–1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gingras, A. C., Gstaiger, M., Raught, B., and Aebersold, R. (2007) Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 8, 645–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guerrero, C., Tagwerker, C., Kaiser, P., and Huang, L. (2006). An integrated mass spec­trometry-based proteomic approach: quantitative analysis of tandem affinity-purified in vivo cross-linked protein complexes (QTAX) to decipher the 26 S proteasome-interacting network. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 366–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taverna, S. D., Ilin, S., Rogers, R. S., Tanny, J. C., Lavender, H., Li, H., Baker, L., Boyle, J., Blair, L. P., Chait, B. T., Patel, D. J., Aitchison, J. D., Tackett, A. J., and Allis, C. D. (2006) Yng1 PHD finger binding to histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 promotes NuA3 HAT activity at lysine 14 of H3 and transcription at a subset of targeted ORFs. Mol. Cell 24, 785–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Byrum, S., Mackintosh, S. G., Edmondson, R. D., Cheung, W. L., Taverna, S. D., and Tackett, A. J. (2010) Analysis of histone exchange during chromatin purification. JIOMICS, 1, 61–65.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cristea, I. M., Williams, R., Chait, B. T., and Rout, M. P. (2005) Fluorescent proteins as ­proteomic probes. Mol Cell Proteomics 4, 1933–1941.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Byrum
    • 1
  • Sherri K. Smart
    • 1
  • Signe Larson
    • 1
  • Alan J. Tackett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle RockUSA

Personalised recommendations