Analysis of Protein Binding Sites by Computational Solvent Mapping
Computational solvent mapping globally samples the surface of target proteins using molecular probes—small molecules or functional groups—to identify potentially favorable binding positions. The method is based on X-ray and NMR screening studies showing that the binding sites of proteins also bind a large variety of fragment-sized molecules. We have developed the multistage mapping algorithm FTMap (available as a server at http://ftmap.bu.edu/) based on the fast Fourier transform (FFT) correlation approach. Identifying regions of low free energy rather than individual low energy conformations, FTMap reproduces the available experimental mapping results. Applications to a variety of proteins show that the probes always cluster in important subsites of the binding site, and the amino acid residues that interact with many probes also bind the specific ligands of the protein. The “consensus” sites at which a number of different probes cluster are likely to be “druggable” sites, capable of binding drug-size ligands with high affinity. Due to its sensitivity to conformational changes, the method can also be used for comparing the binding sites in different structures of a protein.
Key wordsProtein structure Protein–ligand interactions Binding site Binding hot spots Fragment-based ligand design Druggability Binding site comparison Docking
This work has been supported by grant GM064700 from the National Institutes of Health.
- 5.Allen, K. N., Bellamacina, C. R., Ding, X., Jeffery, C. J., Mattos, C., Petsko, G. A, Ringe, D. (1996) An experimental approach to mapping the binding surfaces of crystalline proteins J. Phys. Chem. 100: 2605–2611, 1996.Google Scholar
- 9.Dennis S, Kortvelyesi T, Vajda S. (2002) Computational mapping identifies the binding sites of organic solvents on proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 99: 4290–4295, 2002.Google Scholar
- 13.Vajda S, Guarnieri F. (2006) Characterization of protein-ligand interaction sites using experimental and computational methods. Current Opinion in Drug Design and Development 9: 354–362.Google Scholar
- 14.Landon MR, Lieberman RL, Hoang QQ, Ju S, Caaveiro JM, Orwig SD, Kozakov D, Brenke R, Chuang G-Y, Beglov D, Vajda S, Petsko GA, Ringe D. (2009) Detection of ligand binding hot spots on protein surfaces via fragment-based methods: application to DJ-1 and glucocerebrosidase, J Comput Aided Mol Des. 23: 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Congreve M, Aharony D, Albert J, Callaghan O, Campbell J, Carr RA, Chessari G, Cowan S, Edwards PD, Frederickson M, McMenamin R, Murray CW, Patel S, Wallis N. (2007) Application of fragment screening by X-ray crystallography to the discovery of aminopyridines as inhibitors of beta-secretase. J Med Chem 50:1124–1132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar