Capillary Electrophoresis of DNA from Cannabis sativa for Correlation of Samples to Geographic Origin

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 830)

Abstract

For routine genetic analysis of Cannabis sativa, two methods are currently in use, (a) AFLP; amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis and (b) STR; short tandem repeat analysis. The AFLP method used on capillary electrophoresis instrumentation is fully described in this chapter. AFLP analysis generates numerous nonspecific marker fragments for a complex DNA pattern and is available in kit format for quality assurance of reagents. This method is particularly useful when discerning the genetics of highly inbred plant species that may share much of the same DNA with only slight differences due to their common genetic background. AFLP analysis, however, is most effective on fresh or well-preserved plant specimens where the integrity of the DNA is high and the sample is a single source specimen (i.e., not a mixture of plants or different species).

Key words

Forensic botany AFLP STR Cannabis Marijuana DNA Environmental Database 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was previously supported by the National Institute of Justice Grant #2001-IJ-CX-K011. Thank you to the Connecticut State Forensic Science Laboratory and the University of New Haven for use of their facilities. Numerous students, scientists, and task force personnel offered advice or generated data sets during the course of the grant period. Thank you to Dr. Henry Lee, Major Timothy Palmbach, Dr. Eric Buel, Captain Peter Warren, members of the Connecticut Statewide Narcotics Task Force, Eric Carita, Nicholas C.S. Yang, Elizabeth McClure Baker, Joselle Germano, Edward Jachimowicz III, Shane Lumpkins, Khartika Divarkaran, and Michelle Irvin for their work on the grant funded project.

References

  1. 1.
    Office of National Drug Control Policy (2007) Marijuana on public lands. http://White-HouseDrugPolicy.gov. Accessed 07 January 2011
  2. 2.
    Miller Coyle H, Palmbach T, Juliano N, Ladd C, Lee HC (2003) An overview of DNA methods for the identification and individualization of marijuana. Croat Med J 44(3):315–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Howard C, Gilmore S, Robertson J, Peakall R (2009) A Cannabis sativa STR genotype database for Australian seizures: forensic applications and limitations. J Forensic Sci 54(3):556–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alghanim HJ, Almirall JR (2003) Development of microsatellite markers in Cannabis sativa for DNA typing and genetic relatedness analyses. Anal Bioanal Chem 376(8):1225–1233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hurley JM, West JB, Ehleringer JR (2010) Stable isotope models to predict geographic origin and cultivation conditions of marijuana. Sci Justice 50(2):86–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fry NK, Savelkoul PH, Visca P (2009) Amplified fragment-length polymorphism analysis. Methods Mol Biol 551:89–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaggiotti OE (2010) Bayesian statistical treatment of the fluorescence of AFLP bands leads to accurate genetic structure inference. Mol Ecol 19(21):4586–4588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howard C, Gilmore S, Robertson J, Peakall R (2008) Developmental validation of a Cannabis sativa STR multiplex system for forensic analysis. J Forensic Sci 53(5):1061–1067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsieh HM, Hou RJ, Tsai LC, Wei CS, Liu SW, Huang LH, Kuo YC, Linacre A, Lee JC (2003) A highly polymorphic STR locus in Cannabis sativa. Forensic Sci Int 131(1):53–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mendoza MA, Mills DK, Lata H, Chandra S, ElSohly MA, Almirall JR (2009) Genetic individualization of Cannabis sativa by a short tandem repeat multiplex system. Anal Bioanal Chem 393(2):719–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilmore S, Peakall R, Robertson J (2003) Short tandem repeat (STR) DNA markers are hypervariable and informative in Cannabis sativa: implications for forensic investigations. Forensic Sci Int 131(1):65–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ergül A, Kazan K, Aras S, Cevik V, Celik H, Söylemezoğlu G (2006) AFLP analysis of genetic variation within the two economically important Anatolian grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) varietal groups. Genome 49(5):467–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jakse J, Kindlhofer K, Javornik B (2001) Assessment of genetic variation and differentiation of hop genotypes by microsatellite and AFLP markers. Genome 44(5):773–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuhlman LC, Burson BL, Stelly DM, Klein PE, Klein RR, Price HJ, Rooney WL (2010) Early-generation germplasm introgression from Sorghum macrospermum into sorghum (S. bicolor). Genome 53(6):419–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Opara UL, Jacobson D, Al-Saady NA (2010) Analysis of genetic diversity in banana cultivars (Musa cvs.) from the South of Oman using AFLP markers and classification by phylogenetic, hierarchical clustering and principal component analyses. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 11(5):332–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahman MH, Rajora OP (2002) Microsatellite DNA fingerprinting, differentiation, and genetic relationships of clones, cultivars, and varieties of six poplar species from three sections of the genus Populus. Genome 45(6):1083–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajora P, Rahman H (2003) Microsatellite DNA and RAPD fingerprinting, identification and genetic relationships of hybrid poplar (Populus x canadensis) cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 106(3):470–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stefanowicz-Hajduk J, Filipowicz N, Kosinski I, Ochocka JR (2009) Capillary electrophoresis with dual laser detection in separation of amplified fragment length polymorphism fragments. J Sep Sci 32(20):3539–3543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    (2010) AFLP Plant Mapping Protocol. Applied Biosystems, Inc. Foster City, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miller Coyle H (2005) Forensic botany: principles and applications to criminal casework. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller Coyle H, Shutler G, Tully L, Pagliaro E, Harper A, Palmbach T, Lee HC (2005) Validation of a DNA method for the individualization of plant evidence. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/211999pdf. Accessed 08 January 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forensic Science Department, Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic ScienceUniversity of New HavenWest HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations