Reverse phase protein arrays (RPPAs) emerged as a very useful tool for high-throughput screening of protein expression in large numbers of small specimen. Similar to other protein chemistry methods, antibody specificity is also a major concern for RPPA. Currently, testing antibodies on Western blot for specificity and applying serial dilution curves to determine signal/concentration linearity of RPPA signals are most commonly employed to validate antibodies for RPPA applications. However, even the detection antibodies fulfilling both requirements do not always give the expected result. Chemically synthesized small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are one of the most promising and time-efficient tools for loss-of-function studies by specifically targeting the gene of interest resulting in a reduction at the protein expression level, and are therefore used to dissect biological processes. Here, we report the utilization of siRNA-treated sample lysates for the quantification of a protein of interest as a useful and reliable tool to validate antibody specificity for RPPAs. As our results indicate, we recommend the use of antibodies which give the highest dynamic range between the control siRNA-treated samples and the target protein (here: EGFR) siRNA-treated ones on RPPAs, to be able to quantify even small differences of protein abundance with high confidence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
Paweletz, C.P., et al., Reverse phase protein microarrays which capture disease progression show activation of pro-survival pathways at the cancer invasion front. Oncogene, 2001. 20(16): 1981–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charboneau, L., et al., Utility of reverse phase protein arrays: applications to signalling pathways and human body arrays. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, 2002. 1(3): 305–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurrier, B., S. Ramalingam, and S. Nishizuka, Reverse-phase protein lysate microarrays for cell signaling analysis. Nat Protoc, 2008. 3(11): 1796–808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar