Advertisement

Screening for Radiation Sensitizers of Drosophila Checkpoint Mutants

  • Mara Gladstone
  • Tin Tin SuEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 782)

Abstract

Anti-cancer therapy is largely comprised of radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy treatments. Although a single mode of therapy can be effective in treating certain types of cancer, none presents a cure. Multi-modal therapy, the use of two or more agents in combination (e.g., radiation and chemotherapy together), shows potential for a more effective treatment of cancer. The challenge then is identifying effective therapy combinations. In this chapter, we describe the use of Drosophila as a whole animal in vivo model to screen for small molecules that effectively combine with ionizing radiation to kill checkpoint mutants preferentially over wild-type. The differential use of wild-type and checkpoint mutants has the potential to identify molecules that act in a genotype-specific manner to eradicate checkpoint mutant tissues when combined with radiation, while sparing wild-type tissues.

Key words

Drosophila radiation checkpoint molecule library drug screen cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Petros Yoon for critical reading of the manuscript and for his contribution to the screen. The work in the Su lab is supported by an NIH grant (GM087276) to T. T. Su.

References

  1. 1.
    Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter, P. (2002) Molecular Biology of the Cell, Fourth ed., Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ma, B. B., Bristow, R. G., Kim, J., and Siu, L. L. (2003) Combined-modality treatment of solid tumors using radiotherapy and molecular targeted agents, J Clin Oncol 21, 2760–2776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parchment, R. E., Gordon, M., Grieshaber, C. K., Sessa, C., Volpe, D., and Ghielmini, M. (1998) Predicting hematological toxicity (myelosuppression) of cytotoxic drug therapy from in vitro tests, Ann Oncol 9, 357–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith, R. S., Chen, Q., Hudson, M. M., Link, M. P., Kun, L., Weinstein, H., Billett, A., Marcus, K. J., Tarbell, N. J., and Donaldson, S. S. (2003) Prognostic factors for children with Hodgkin’s disease treated with combined-modality therapy, J Clin Oncol 21, 2026–2033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    David, H. L. (1970) Probability distribution of drug-resistant mutants in unselected populations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Appl Microbiol 20, 810–814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma, P. L., Nurpeisov, V., Hernandez-Santiago, B., Beltran, T., and Schinazi, R. F. (2004) Nucleoside inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase, Curr Top Med Chem 4, 895–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jaklevic, B., Uyetake, L., Lemstra, W., Chang, J., Leary, W., Edwards, A., Vidwans, S., Sibon, O., and Tin Su, T. (2006) Contribution of growth and cell cycle checkpoints to radiation survival in Drosophila, Genetics 174, 1963–1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaklevic, B. R., and Su, T. T. (2004) Relative contribution of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and cell death to survival after DNA damage in Drosophila larvae, Curr Biol 14, 23–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fogarty, P., Kalpin, R. F., and Sullivan, W. (1994) The Drosophila maternal-effect mutation grapes causes a metaphase arrest at nuclear cycle 13, Development 120, 2131–2142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fogarty, P., Campbell, S. D., Abu-Shumays, R., Phalle, B. S., Yu, K. R., Uy, G. L., Goldberg, M. L., and Sullivan, W. (1997) The Drosophila grapes gene is related to checkpoint gene chk1/rad27 and is required for late syncytial division fidelity, Curr Biol 7, 418–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Purdy, A., Uyetake, L., Cordeiro, M. G., and Su, T. T. (2005) Regulation of mitosis in response to damaged or incompletely replicated DNA require different levels of Grapes (Drosophila Chk1), J Cell Sci 118, 3305–3315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rong, Y. S., Titen, S. W., Xie, H. B., Golic, M. M., Bastiani, M., Bandyopadhyay, P., Olivera, B. M., Brodsky, M., Rubin, G. M., and Golic, K. G. (2002) Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster, Genes Dev 16, 1568–1581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations