Modeling Experimental Design for Proteomics

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 673)


The complexity of proteomes makes good experimental design essential for their successful investigation. Here, we describe how proteomics experiments can be modeled and how computer simulations of these models can be used to improve experimental designs.

Key words

Proteomics Mass spectrometry Experimental design Simulations Modeling 



This work was supported by funding provided by the National Institutes of Health Grants RR00862 and RR022220, the Carl Trygger foundation, and the Swedish research council.


  1. 1.
    S. Ghaemmaghami, W.K. Huh, K. Bower, R.W. Howson, A. Belle, N. Dephoure, E.K. O’Shea, and J.S. Weissman (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast, Nature, 425, 737–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N.L. Anderson and N.G. Anderson (2002) The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects, Mol Cell Proteomics, 1, 845–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Aebersold and M. Mann (2003) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics, Nature, 422, 198–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Wang, S.G. Clouthier, V. Galchev, D.E. Misek, U. Duffner, C.K. Min, R. Zhao, J. Tra, G.S. Omenn, J.L. Ferrara, and S.M. Hanash (2005) Intact-protein-based high-resolution three-dimensional quantitative analysis system for proteome profiling of biological fluids, Mol Cell Proteomics, 4, 618–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Ishihama (2005) Proteomic LC-MS systems using nanoscale liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, J Chromatogr A, 1067, 73–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B.J. Cargile, J.L. Bundy, T.W. Freeman, and J.L. Stephenson, Jr. (2004) Gel based isoelectric focusing of peptides and the utility of isoelectric point in protein identification, J Proteome Res, 3, 112–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.J. Coon, J.E. Syka, J. Shabanowitz, and D.F. Hunt (2005) Tandem mass spectrometry for peptide and protein sequence analysis, Biotechniques, 38, 519, 521, 523.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.S. Johnson, M.T. Davis, J.A. Taylor, and S.D. Patterson (2005) Informatics for protein identification by mass spectrometry, Methods, 35, 223–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. McHugh and J.W. Arthur (2008) Computational methods for protein identification from mass spectrometry data, PLoS Comput Biol, 4, e12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Fenyo (2000) Identifying the proteome: software tools, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 11, 391–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Eriksson and D. Fenyo (2007) Improving the success rate of proteome analysis by modeling protein-abundance distributions and experimental designs, Nat Biotechnol, 25, 651–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O.V. Krokhin, R. Craig, V. Spicer, W. Ens, K.G. Standing, R.C. Beavis, and J.A. Wilkins (2004) An improved model for prediction of retention times of tryptic peptides in ion pair reversed-phase HPLC: its application to protein peptide mapping by off-line HPLC-MALDI MS, Mol Cell Proteomics, 3, 908–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistrySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.The Rockefeller UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations