Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays pp 189-213

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 567)

Determining Spatial Chromatin Organization of Large Genomic Regions Using 5C Technology

  • Nynke L. van Berkum
  • Job Dekker
Protocol

Abstract

Spatial organization of chromatin plays an important role at multiple levels of genome regulation. On a global scale, its function is evident in processes like metaphase and chromosome segregation. On a detailed level, long-range interactions between regulatory elements and promoters are essential for proper gene regulation. Microscopic techniques like FISH can detect chromatin contacts, although the resolution is generally low making detection of enhancer–promoter interaction difficult. The 3C methodology allows for high-resolution analysis of chromatin interactions. 3C is now widely used and has revealed that long-range looping interactions between genomic elements are widespread. However, studying chromatin interactions in large genomic regions by 3C is very labor intensive. This limitation is overcome by the 5C technology. 5C is an adaptation of 3C, in which the concurrent use of thousands of primers permits the simultaneous detection of millions of chromatin contacts. The design of the 5C primers is critical because this will determine which and how many chromatin interactions will be examined in the assay. Starting material for 5C is a 3C template. To make a 3C template, chromatin interactions in living cells are cross-linked using formaldehyde. Next, chromatin is digested and subsequently ligated under conditions favoring ligation events between cross-linked fragments. This yields a genome-wide 3C library of ligation products representing all chromatin interactions in vivo. 5C then employs multiplex ligation-mediated amplification to detect, in a single assay, up to millions of unique ligation products present in the 3C library. The resulting 5C library can be analyzed by microarray analysis or deep sequencing. The observed abundance of a 5C product is a measure of the interaction frequency between the two corresponding chromatin fragments. The power of the 5C technique described in this chapter is the high-throughput, high-resolution, and quantitative way in which the spatial organization of chromatin can be examined.

Key words

Chromosome conformation capture chromatin looping chromatin structure long-range gene regulation high-throughput 

References

  1. 1.
    ENCODE-consortium. (2007) Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447, 799–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kleinjan, D. A. and van Heyningen, V. (2005) Long-range control of gene expression: emerging mechanisms and disruption in disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 8–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dekker, J. (2008) Gene regulation in the third dimension. Science 319, 1793–1794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R. J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. and de Laat, W. (2002) Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol. Cell. 10, 1453–1465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spilianakis, C. G. and Flavell, R. A. (2004) Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. Nat. Immunol. 5, 1017–1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cremer, T. and Cremer C. (2001) Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 292–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sexton, T., Schober, H., Fraser, P. and Gasser, S. M. (2007) Gene regulation through nuclear organization. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1049–1055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. and Kleckner, N. (2002) Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. and de Laat, W. (2004) 3C technology: analyzing the spatial organization of genomic loci in vivo. Meth. Enzymol. 375, 493–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miele, A., Gheldof, N., Tabuchi, T. M., Dostie, J. and Dekker, J. Mapping chromatin interactions by Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C). (2006) In: Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A. and Struhl, K., eds. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Vol. Supplement 74. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 21.11.1–21.11.20.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lomvardas, S., Barnea, G., Pisapia, D. J., Mendelsohn, M., Kirkland, J. and Axel, R. (2006) Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice. Cell 126, 403–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spilianakis, C.G., Lalioti, M. D., Town, T., Lee, G. R. and Flavell, R. A. (2005) Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci. Nature 435, 637–645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bacher, C. P., Guggiari, M. and Brors, B., et al. (2006) Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. Nat Cell Biol. 8, 293–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, N., Tsai, C. L. and Lee, J. T. (2006) Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science 311, 1149–1152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dostie, J., Richmond, T. A. and Arnaout, R. A., et al. (2006) Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): A massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299–1309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dostie, J. and Dekker, J. (2007) Mapping networks of physical interactions between genomic elements using 5C technology. Nat. Protoc. 2, 988–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dekker, J. (2006) The 3 C's of Chromosome Conformation Capture: controls, controls, controls. Nat. Methods 3, 17–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nynke L. van Berkum
    • 1
  • Job Dekker
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Gene Function and Expression and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular PharmacologyUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations