Advertisement

Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Cytome Assay in Lymphocytes

  • Philip Thomas
  • Michael Fenech
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 682)

Abstract

The cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome (CBMN cyt) assay is a new and comprehensive technique for measuring DNA damage, cytostasis, and cytotoxicity in different tissue types, including lymphocytes. DNA damage events are scored specifically in once-divided binucleated cells. These events include; (a) micro­nuclei (MNi), a biomarker of chromosome breakage and/or whole chromosome loss; (b) nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs), a biomarker of DNA misrepair and/or telomere end-fusions; and (c) nuclear buds (NBUDs), a biomarker of elimination of amplified DNA and/or DNA repair complexes. Cytostatic effects are measured via the proportion of mono-, bi-, and multinucleated cells and cytotoxicity via necrotic and/or apoptotic cell ratios. The assay has been applied to the biomonitoring of in vivo exposure to genotoxins, in vitro genotoxicity testing and in diverse research fields, such as nutrigenomics and pharmacogenomics. It has also been shown to be important as a predictor of normal tissue and tumor radiation sensitivity and cancer risk. This protocol also describes the current established methods for culturing lymphocytes, slide preparation, cellular and nuclear staining, scoring criteria, data recording, and analyses.

Key words

Micronucleus Lymphocyte Cytome Nucleoplasmic bridge Nuclear bud DNA damage Cytotoxicity 

References

  1. 1.
    Heddle, J. A. (1973) A rapid in vivo test for chromosomal damage. Mutat Res 18, 187–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmid, W. (1975) The micronucleus test. Mutat Res 31, 9–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fenech, M. (2000) The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 455, 81–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fenech, M., and Morley, A. A. (1986) Cytokinesis-block micronucleus method in human lymphocytes: effect of in vivo ageing and low dose X-irradiation. Mutat Res 161, 193–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carter, S. B. (1967) Effects of cytochalasins on mammalian cells. Nature 213, 261–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fenech, M. (1997) The advantages and disadvantages of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus method. Mutat Res 392, 11–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fenech, M. (2000) A mathematical model of the in vitro micronucleus assay predicts false negative results if micronuclei are not specifically scored in binucleated cells or in cells that have completed one nuclear division. Mutagenesis 15, 329–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenech, M., and Morley, A. (1985) Solutions to the kinetic problem in the micronucleus assay. Cytobios 43, 233–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fenech, M., and Morley, A. A. (1985) Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes. Mutat Res 147, 29–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Degrassi, F., and Tanzarella, C. (1988) Immunofluorescent staining of kinetochores in micronuclei: a new assay for the detection of aneuploidy. Mutat Res 203, 339–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomson, E. J., and Perry, P. E. (1988) The identification of micronucleated chromosomes: a possible assay for aneuploidy. Mutagenesis 3, 415–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farooqi, Z., Darroudi, F., and Natarajan, A. T. (1993) The use of fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of aneugens in cytokinesis-blocked mouse splenocytes. Mutagenesis 8, 329–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schuler, M., Rupa, D. S., and Eastmond, D. A. (1997) A critical evaluation of centromeric labeling to distinguish micronuclei induced by chromosomal loss and breakage in vitro. Mutat Res 392, 81–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fenech, M. (2002) Chromosomal biomarkers of genomic instability relevant to cancer. Drug Discov Today 7, 1128–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoffelder, D. R., Luo, L., Burke, N. A., Watkins, S. C., Gollin, S. M., and Saunders, W. S. (2004) Resolution of anaphase bridges in cancer cells. Chromosoma 112, 389–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas, P., Umegaki, K., and Fenech, M. (2003) Nucleoplasmic bridges are a sensitive measure of chromosome rearrangement in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 18, 187–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Serrano-Garcia, L., and Montero-Montoya, R. (2001) Micronuclei and chromatid buds are the result of related genotoxic events. Environ Mol Mutagen 38, 38–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shimizu, N., Shimura, T., and Tanaka, T. (2000) Selective elimination of acentric ­double minutes from cancer cells through the extrusion of micronuclei. Mutat Res 448, 81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fenech, M., Perepetskaya, G., and Mikhalevich, L. (1997) A more comprehensive application of the micronucleus technique for biomonitoring of genetic damage rates in human populations – experiences from the Chernobyl catastrophe. Environ Mol Mutagen 30, 112–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirsch-Volders, M., and Fenech, M. (2001) Inclusion of micronuclei in non-divided mononuclear lymphocytes and necrosis/apoptosis may provide a more comprehensive cytokinesis block micronucleus assay for biomonitoring purposes. Mutagenesis 16, 51–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fenech, M. (2006) Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a “cytome” assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death. Mutat Res 600, 58–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eastmond, D. A., and Tucker, J. D. (1989) Identification of aneuploidy-inducing agents using cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes and an antikinetochore antibody. Environ Mol Mutagen 13, 34–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, T. K., O’Brien, K., Eaves, G. S., Christie, K. I., and Varga, L. (1999) Effect of blood storage on radiation-induced micronuclei in human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 444, 201–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burrill, W., Levine, E. L., Hindocha, P., Roberts, S. A., and Scott, D. (2000) The use of cryopreserved lymphocytes in assessing inter-individual radiosensitivity with the micronucleus assay. Int J Radiat Biol 76, 375–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Donovan, M. R., Freemantle, M. R., Hull, G., Bell, D. A., Arlett, C. F., and Cole, J. (1995) Extended-term cultures of human T-lymphocytes: a practical alternative to primary human lymphocytes for use in genotoxicity testing. Mutagenesis 10, 189–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fenech, M., Chang, W. P., Kirsch-Volders, M., Holland, N., Bonassi, S., and Zeiger, E. (2003) HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures. Mutat Res 534, 65–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Thomas
    • 1
  • Michael Fenech
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Human NutritionAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations