Advertisement

Epitope Mapping of Protein Antigens by Competition ELISA

  • Glenn E. Morris
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

At their most elaborate, epitope mapping techniques can provide detailed information on the amino acid residues in a protein antigen which are in direct contact with the antibody-binding site. For immunoassay purposes, however, it is often more important to know whether one antibody interferes with the binding of a second antibody against the same antigen or whether both antibodies can bind without mutual competition. Antibodies in the latter category must recognize different epitopes and are useful for two-site assays in which one antibody is used to capture the antigen from a complex mixture (e.g., plasma or tissue extracts), while a second is used to detect the captured antigen. Antibodies that do compete with each other probably recognize the same epitope or a very near neighbor (1), but the possibility that they bind to widely separated epitopes and compete by altering the conformation of the antigen must always be considered. Epitope mapping is usually performed with monoclonal antibodies (MAb), since polyclonal antisera are usually directed against a number of different epitopes and results could be difficult to interpret.

Keywords

Polyclonal Antiserum Incubation Buffer Epitope Mapping Disodium Hydrogen Phosphate ELISA Format 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kordossi, A. A. and Tzartos, S. J. (1987) Conformation of cytoplasmic segments of acetylcholine receptor α-and β-subunits probed by monoclonal antibodies: sensitivity of the antibody competition approach. EMBO. J. 6, 1605–1610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nguyen thi Man, Cartwright, A. J., Andrews, K. M., and Morris, G. E. (1989) Treatment of human muscle creatine kinase with glutaraldehyde preferentially increases the immunogenicity of the native conformation and permits production of high-affinity monoclonal antibodies which recognize two distinct surface epitopes. J. Immunol. Methods 125, 251–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tzartos, S. J., Rand, D. E., Einarson, B. R., and Lindstrom, J. M. (1981) Mapping of surface structures of electrophorus acetylcholine receptor using monoclonal antibodies. J. Biol. Chem. 256, 8635–8645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Le Thiet Thanh, Nguyen thi Man, Buu Mat, Phan Ngoc Tran, Nguyen thi Vinh Ha, and Morris, G. E. (1991) Structural relationships between hepatitis B surface antigen in human plasma and dimers of recombinant vaccine: a monoclonal antibody study. Virus Res. 21, 141–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Sullivan, M. J. and Marks, V. (1981) Methods for preparation of enzyme-antibody conjugates for use in enzyme immunoassay. Methods Enzymol. 73, 147–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Catty, D. and Raykundalia, C. (1989) ELISA and related enzyme immunoassays, in Antibodies: A Practical Approach, vol. II (Catty, D., ed.), IRL, Oxford, UK, pp. 97–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn E. Morris
    • 1
  1. 1.MRIC, NE Wales InstituteDeeside, ClwydUK

Personalised recommendations