Advertisement

MASCIS Spinal Cord Contusion Model

  • Wise Young
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

The impactor is the most widely used rodent spinal cord injury model. The Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study (MASCIS) adopted the model in 1993 and standardized protocols for anesthesia, surgery, spinal cord contusion, and post-injury care of rats, as well as specific outcome measures. The MASCIS model stipulates Long-Evan's hooded rats that are 77 ± 1-day old and anesthetized with pentobarbital (intraperitoneal 45 mg kg−1 female, 6 mg kg−1 male). After removing the T10 and half of T9 lamina, the rat is suspended by clamping the T8 and T11 dorsal vertebral processes. The Impactor is used to drop a 10-gram rod 12.5, 25.0, or 5.0 mm onto T11 spinal cord. The Impactor tracks the trajectory of the falling rod (±10 μm and ±10 μs) and measures impact velocity (Vi), cord compression distance (Cd), time (Ct), and rate (Cr = Cd/Ct). The rats get tracheal suction for respiratory depression and subcutaneous saline (5–10 ml) for dehydration. The rats are treated with cephalosporin (25 mg kg−1 day−1) for 7 days and daily bladder expression. Recurrent urinary tract infections are treated with a 10-day course of enrofloxacin (2.5 mg kg−1 day−1). If the rats develop autophagia, they receive daily oral acetaminophen (65 mg kg−1 Children's Tylenol). Spinal cord lesion volume is estimated from Na and K concentrations of the spinal cord. Walking recovery is assessed with the BBB locomotor scale. Spared white matter is used to assess spinal cord damage at 6–12 weeks.

Keywords

Spinal cord injury Contusion Surgery Care Walking Lesion volume 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Constantini S, Young W. The effects of methylprednisolone and the ganglioside GM1 on acute spinal cord injury in rats. Journal of Neurosurgery 1994;80(1):97–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC, Komon J, et al. Endogenous repair after spinal cord contusion injuries in the rat. Exp Neurol 1997;148(2):453–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC, et al. MASCIS evaluation of open field loco-motor scores: effects of experience and teamwork on reliability. Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurotrauma 1996;13(7):343–59.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Young W. Spinal cord contusion models. Prog Brain Res 2002;137:231–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Young W, Kume-Kick J, Constantini S. Glucocorticoid therapy of spinal cord injury. [Review] [243 refs]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1994;743:241–63; discussion 63–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Young W, Constantini S. Ionic and water shifts in injured central nervous tissues. In: Salzman S, Faden AI, eds. Neurobiology of Central Nervous System Trauma. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993:Chapter 11, pp. 221–33.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma 1995;12(1):1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection. Exp Neurol 1996;139(2):244–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wise Young
    • 1
  1. 1.W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative NeuroscienceRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations