Advertisement

Bioinformatics pp 143-161 | Cite as

Multiple Sequence Alignment

  • Walter Pirovano
  • Jaap Heringa
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 452)

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) has assumed a key role in comparative structure and function analysis of biological sequences. It often leads to fundamental biological insight into sequence-structure-function relationships of nucleotide or protein sequence families. Significant advances have been achieved in this field, and many useful tools have been developed for constructing alignments. It should be stressed, however, that many complex biological and methodological issues are still open. This chapter first provides some background information and considerations associated with MSA techniques, concentrating on the alignment of protein sequences. Then, a practical overview of currently available methods and a description of their specific advantages and limitations are given, so that this chapter might constitute a helpful guide or starting point for researchers who aim to construct a reliable MSA.

Key words

multiple sequence alignment progressive alignment dynamic programming phylogenetic tree evolutionary scheme amino acid exchange matrix sequence profile gap penalty 

References

  1. 1.
    Gribskov, M., McLachlan, A. D., Eisenberg, D. (1987) Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84, 4355–4358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haussler, D., Krogh, A., Mian, I. S., et al. (1993) Protein modeling using hidden Markov models: analysis of globins, in Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bucher, P., Karplus, K., Moeri, N., et al. (1996) A flexible motif search technique based on generalized profiles. Comput Chem 20, 3–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dayhoff, M. O., Schwart, R. M., Orcutt, B. C. (1978) A model of evolutionary change in proteins, in (Dayhoff, M., ed.), Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henikoff, S., Henikoff, J. G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89, 10915–10919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Needleman, S. B., Wunsch, C. D. (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48, 443–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carillo, H., Lipman, D. J. (1988) The multiple sequence alignment problem in biology. SIAM J Appl Math 48, 1073–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stoye, J., Moulton, V., Dress, A. W. (1997) DCA: an efficient implementation of the divide-and-conquer approach to simultaneous multiple sequence alignment. Comput Appl Biosci 13, 625–626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng, D. F., Doolittle, R. F. (1987) Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. J Mol Evol 25, 351–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hogeweg, P., Hesper, B. (1984) The alignment of sets of sequences and the construction of phyletic trees: an integrated method. J Mol Evol 20, 175–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gotoh, O. (1996) Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. J Mol Biol 264, 823–838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215, 403–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pearson, W. R. (1990) Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. Methods Enzymol 183, 63–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heringa, J., Taylor, W. R. (1997) Three-dimensional domain duplication, swapping and stealing. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7, 416–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, T. F., Waterman, M. S. (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 147, 195–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waterman, M. S., Eggert, M. (1987) A new algorithm for best subsequence alignments with application to tRNA-rRNA comparisons. J Mol Biol 197, 723–728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson, J. D., Plewniak, F., Poch, O. (1999) BAliBASE: a benchmark alignment database for the evaluation of multiple alignment programs. Bioinformatics 15, 87–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heringa, J. (1999) Two strategies for sequence comparison: profile-preprocessed and secondary structure-induced multiple alignment. Comput Chem 23, 341–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heringa, J. (2002) Local weighting schemes for protein multiple sequence alignment. Comput Chem 26, 459–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simossis, V. A., Heringa, J. (2005) PRALINE: a multiple sequence alignment toolbox that integrates homology-extended and secondary structure information. Nucleic Acids Res 33, W289–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schaffer, A. A., et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kabsch, W., Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones, D. T. (1999) Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 292, 195–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rost, B., Sander, C. (1993) Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 232, 584–599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin, K., Simossis, V. A., Taylor, W. Ret al. (2005) A simple and fast secondary structure prediction method using hidden neural networks. Bioinformatics 21, 152–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Edgar, R. C. (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinfor-matics 5, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Edgar, R. C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792–1797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Edgar, R. C. (2004) Local homology recognition and distance measures in linear time using compressed amino acid alphabets. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 380–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Notredame, C., Higgins, D. G., Heringa, J. (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302, 205–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang, X., Miller, W. (1991) A time-efficient, linear-space local similarity algorithm. Adv Appl Math 12, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., Gibson, T. J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    O'Sullivan, O., Suhre, K., Abergel, C., et al. (2004) 3DCoffee: combining protein sequences and structures within multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 340, 385–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Taylor, W. R., Orengo, C. A. (1989) Protein structure alignment. J Mol Biol 208, 1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shi, J., Blundell,T. L., Mizuguchi, K. (2001) FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 310, 243–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wallace,I.M.,O'Sullivan,O.,Higgins,D.G., et al. (2006) M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res 34, 1692–1699.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Katoh, K, Misawa, K, Kuma, K, et al. (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 3059–3066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Katoh, K., Kuma, K, Toh, H., et al. (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 511–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gotoh, O. (1995) A weighting system and algorithm for aligning many phylogenetically related sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 11, 543–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Altschul, S. F. (1998) Generalized affine gap costs for protein sequence alignment. Proteins 32, 88–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zachariah, M. A., Crooks, G. E., Holbrook, S. R, et al. (2005) A generalized affine gap model significantly improves protein sequence alignment accuracy. Proteins 58, 329–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Do, C. B., Mahabhashyam, M. S., Brudno, M., et al. (2005) ProbCons: Probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res 15, 330–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Holmes, I., Durbin, R. (1998) Dynamic programming alignment accuracy. J Comput Biol 5, 493–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhou, PL, Zhou, Y. (2005) SPEM: improving multiple sequence alignment with sequence profiles and predicted secondary structures. Bioinformatics 21, 3615–3621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rost, B. (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 12, 85–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sammeth, M., Heringa, J. (2006) Global multiple-sequence alignment with repeats. Prot Struct Funct Bioinf 64, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morgenstern, B., Dress, A., Werner, T. (1996) Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment based on segment-to-segment comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 12098–12103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Morgenstern, B. (2004) DIALIGN: multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment at BiBiServ. Nucleic Acids Res 32, W33–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., et al. (2001) Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305, 567–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kail, L., Krogh, A., Sonnhammer, E.L. (2004) A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol 338, 1027–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Clamp, M., Cuff, J., Searle, S. M., et al. (2004) The Jalview Java alignment editor. Bioinformatics 20, 426–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Saitou, N., Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Galtier, N., Gouy, M., Gautier, C. (1996) SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci 12, 543–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Li, W.-LL, Graur, D. (1991) Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gille, C, Frommel, C. (2001) STRAP: editor for STRuctural Alignments of Proteins. Bioinformatics 17, 377–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Parry-Smith, D. J., Payne, A. W., Michie, A. D., et al. (1998) CINEMA-a novel colour INteractive editor for multiple alignments. Gene 221, GC57–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Attwood, T. K., Beck, M. E., Bleasby, A. J., et al. (1997) Novel developments with the PRINTS protein fingerprint database. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 212–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Pirovano
    • 1
  • Jaap Heringa
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Integrative Bioinformatics (IBIVU)VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations