Gene Knockout Protocols pp 1-12

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 530)

| Cite as

Overview on Mouse Mutagenesis

  • Ralf Kühn
  • Wolfgang Wurst
Protocol

Abstract

In this chapter we give an overview of mutagenesis methods in the mouse as they evolved over the last two decades, an outlook of ongoing and future developments and advice for choosing a mutagenesis strategy. Where appropriate, reference is given to relevant chapters of this book, key original articles and links of web-based resources for mouse mutagenesis.

Key words

Knockout mice conditional mutagenesis Cre/loxP RNAi knockdown ENU mutagenesis chimaeric mice 

References

  1. 1.
    Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292:154–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981; 78:7634–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley A, Evans M, Kaufman MH, Robertson E. Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 1984; 309:255–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gossler A, Doetschman T, Korn R, Serfling E, Kemler R. Transgenesis by means of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986; 83:9065–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas KR, Capecchi MR. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 1987; 51:503–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Capecchi MR. The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends Genet 1989; 5:70–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwartzberg PL, Goff SP, Robertson EJ. Germ-line transmission of a c-abl mutation produced by targeted gene disruption in ES cells. Science 1989; 246:799–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Angrand PO, Daigle N, van der Hoeven F, Scholer HR, Stewart AF. Simplified generation of targeting constructs using ET recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27:e16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, et al. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 2001; 73:56–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Testa G, Vintersten K, Zhang Y, Benes V, Muyrers JP, Stewart AF. BAC engineering for the generation of ES cell-targeting constructs and mouse transgenes. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004; 256:123–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu P, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res. 2003; 13:476–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanford WL, Cohn JB, Cordes SP. Gene-trap mutagenesis: past, present and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001; 2:756–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Munroe RJ, Bergstrom RA, Zheng QY, et al. Mouse mutants from chemically mutagenized embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2000; 24:318–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vivian JL, Chen Y, Yee D, Schneider E, Magnuson T. An allelic series of mutations in Smad2 and Smad4 identified in a genotype-based screen of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-mutagenized mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002; 99:15542–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aarts M, Dekker M, de Vries S, van der Wal A, te Riele H. Generation of a mouse mutant by oligonucleotide-mediated gene modification in ES cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34:e147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kühn R, Streif S, Wurst W. RNA interference in mice. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2007:149–76.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gu H, Marth JD, Orban PC, Mossmann H, Rajewsky K. Deletion of a DNA polymerase beta gene segment in T cells using cell type-specific gene targeting. Science 1994; 265:103–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rajewsky K, Gu H, Kuhn R, et al. Conditional gene targeting. J. Clin. Invest. 1996; 98:600–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwan KM. Conditional alleles in mice: practical considerations for tissue-specific knockouts. Genesis 2002; 32:49–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Branda CS, Dymecki SM. Talking about a revolution: the impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. Dev. Cell 2004; 6:7–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torres RM, Kühn R. Laboratory Protocols for Conditional Gene Targeting. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997:167p.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hrabé de Angelis M, Chambon P, Brown S. Standards of Mouse Model Phenotyping. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2006:332p.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Collins FS, Rossant J, Wurst W. A mouse for all reasons. Cell 2007; 128:9–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Kühn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wolfgang Wurst
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Developmental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental HealthMunichGermany
  2. 2.Lehrstuhl für EntwicklungsgenetikTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Developmental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health & Max-Plank-Institute for PsychiatryMunichGermany
  4. 4.Lehrstuhl für EntwicklungsgenetikTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations