Toward a Full Characterization of the Human 20S Proteasome Subunits and Their Isoforms by a Combination of Proteomic Approaches

  • Sandrine Uttenweiler-Joseph
  • Stéphane Claverol
  • Loïk Sylvius
  • Marie-Pierre Bousquet-Dubouch
  • Odile Burlet-Schiltz
  • Bernard Monsarrat
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 484)

Abstract

The 20S proteasome is a multicatalytic protein complex, present in all eukaryotic cells, that plays a major role in intracellular protein degradation. In mammalian cells, this symmetrical cylindrical complex is composed of two copies each of seven different α and β subunits arranged into four stacked rings (α7β7β7α7). Separation by two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis of the human erythrocytes 20S proteasome subunits and mass spectrometry (MS) identification of all the observed spots reveal the presence of multiple isoforms for most of the subunits. These isoforms could correspond to protein variants and/or posttranslational modifications that may influence the 20S proteasome proteolytic activity. Their characterization is therefore important to establish the rules governing structure/activity relationships of the human 20S proteasome. This chapter describes the use of a combination of proteomic approaches to characterize the human 20S proteasome subunit isoforms separated by 2D gel electrophoresis. A “top-down” strategy was developed to determine by electrospray MS the molecular mass of the intact protein after its passive elution from the gel. Comparison of the experimental molecular mass to the theoretical one can reveal the presence of possible modifications. “Bottom-up” proteomic approaches are then performed and, after protein digestion, tandem MS analyses of the modified peptides allow the characterization and location of the modification. These methods are discussed for the study of the human erythrocytes 20S proteasome subunit isoforms.

Key Words

2D gel electrophoresis protein gel elution top-down and bottom-up proteomic approaches mass spectrometry protein modifications catalytic protein complex 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Unno, M., Mizushima, T., Morimoto, Y., Tomisugi, Y., Tanaka, K., Yasuoka, N., et al. (2002) The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 Å resolution. Structure 10, 609–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orlowski, M. and Wilk, S. (2000) Catalytic activities of the 20S proteasome, a multicatalytic proteinase complex. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 383, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rock, K. L. and Goldberg, A. L. (1999) Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17, 739–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morel, S., Levy, F., Burlet-Schiltz, O., Brasseur, F., Probst-Kepper, M., Peitrequin, A. L., et al. (2000) Processing of some antigens by the standard proteasome but not by the immunoproteasome results in poor presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 12, 107–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van den Eynde, B. J. and Morel, S. (2001) Differential processing of class-I-restricted epitopes by the standard proteasome and the immunoproteasome. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 13, 147–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burlet-Schiltz, O., Claverol, S., Gairin, J. E., and Monsarrat, B. (2005) The use of mass spectrometry to identify antigens from proteasome processing. Methods Enzymol. 405, 264–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Macagno, A., Gilliet, M., Sallusto, F., Lanzavecchia, A., Nestle, F. O., and Groettrup, M. (1999) Dendritic cells up-regulate immunoproteasomes and the proteasome regulator PA28 during maturation. Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 4037–4042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noda, C., Tanahashi, N., Shimbara, N., Hendil, K. B., and Tanaka, K. (2000) Tissue distribution of constitutive proteasomes, immunoproteasomes, and PA28 in rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 277, 348–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Husom, A. D., Peters, E. A., Kolling, E. A., Fugere, N. A., Thompson, L. V., and Ferrington, D. A. (2004) Altered proteasome function and subunit composition in aged muscle. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 421, 67–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drews, O., Zong, C., and Ping, P. (2007) Exploring proteasome complexes by proteomic approaches. Proteomics 7, 1047–1058.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Claverol, S., Burlet-Schiltz, O., Girbal-Neuhauser, E., Gairin, J. E., and Monsarrat, B. (2002) Mapping and structural dissection of human 20S proteasome using proteomic approaches. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 567–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iwafune, Y., Kawasaki, H., and Hirano, H. (2002) Electrophoretic analysis of phosphorylation of the yeast 20S proteasome. Electrophoresis 23, 329–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurucz, E., Ando, I., Sumegi, M., Holzl, H., Kapelari, B., Baumeister, W., et al. (2002) Assembly of the Drosophila 26S proteasome is accompanied by extensive subunit rearrangements. Biochem. J. 365, 527–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, P., Fu, H., Walker, J., Papa, C. M., Smalle, J., Ju, Y. M., et al. (2004) Purification of the Arabidopsis 26S proteasome: biochemical and molecular analyses revealed the presence of multiple isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 6401–6413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang, L. and Burlingame, A. L. (2005) Comprehensive mass spectrometric analysis of the 20S proteasome complex. Methods Enzymol. 405, 187–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Froment, C., Uttenweiler-Joseph, S., Bousquet-Dubouch, M. P., Matondo, M., Borges, J. P., Esmenjaud, C., et al. (2005) A quantitative proteomic approach using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and isotope-coded affinity tag labeling for studying human 20S proteasome heterogeneity. Proteomics 5, 2351–2363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gomes, A. V., Zong, C., Edmondson, R. D., Li, X., Stefani, E., Zhang, J., et al. (2006) Mapping the murine cardiac 26S proteasome complexes. Circ. Res. 99, 362–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt, F., Dahlmann, B., Janek, K., Kloss, A., Wacker, M., Ackermann, R., et al. (2006) Comprehensive quantitative proteome analysis of 20S proteasome subtypes from rat liver by isotope coded affinity tag and 2-D gel-based approaches. Proteomics 6, 4622–4632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Castano, J. G., Mahillo, E., Aritzi, P., and Arribas, J. (1996) Phosphorylation of C8 and C9 subunits of the multicatalytic proteinase by casein kinase II and identification of the C8 phosphorylation sites by direct mutagenesis. Biochemistry 35, 3782–3789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kimura, Y., Takaoka, M., Tanaka, S., Sassa, H., Tanaka, K., Polevoda, B., et al. (2000) N(alpha)-acetylation and proteolytic activity of the yeast 20S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 4635–4639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, X., Chen, C. F., Baker, P. R., Chen, P. I., Kaiser, P., and Huang, L. (2007) Mass spectrometric characterization of the affinity-purified human 26S proteasome complex. Biochemistry 46, 3553–3565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bousquet-Dubouch, M. P., Uttenweiler-Joseph, S., Ducoux-Petit, M., Matondo, M., Monsarrat, M., and Burlet-Schiltz, O. (2008) Organelle proteomics. In: Pflieger, D., Rossier, J. (eds.). Methods Mol. Biol. 432, 301–320.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Claverol, S., Burlet-Schiltz, O., Gairin, J. E., and Monsarrat, B. (2003) Characterization of protein variants and post-translational modifications: ESI-MSn analyses of intact protein eluted from polyacrylamide gels. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2, 483–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee, L. W., Moomaw, C. R., Orth, K., McGuire, M. J., DeMartino, G. N., and Slaughter, C. A. (1990) Relationship among the subunits of the high molecular weight proteinase, macropain (proteasome). Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1037, 178–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beausoleil, S. A., Jedrychowski, M., Schwartz, D., Elias, J. E., Villen, J., Li, J., et al. (2004) Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12130–12135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beausoleil, S. A., Villen, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., and Gygi S. P. (2006) A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285–1292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krokhin, O. V., Antonovici, M., Ens, W., Wilkins, J. A., and Standing, K. G. (2006) Deamidation of-Asn-Gly-sequences during sample preparation for proteomics: consequences for MALDI and HPLC-MALDI analysis. Anal. Chem. 78, 6645–6650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zühl, F., and Seemüller, E. (1998) The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 92, 367–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hamdan, M., Galvani, M., and Righetti, P. G. (2001) Monitoring 2-D gel-induced modifications of proteins by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 20, 121–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shevchenko, A., Loboda, A., Ens, W., Schraven, B., and Standing, K. G. (2001) Archived polyacrylamide gels as a resource for proteome characterization by mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 22, 1194–1203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandrine Uttenweiler-Joseph
    • 1
  • Stéphane Claverol
    • 2
  • Loïk Sylvius
    • 3
  • Marie-Pierre Bousquet-Dubouch
    • 1
  • Odile Burlet-Schiltz
    • 1
  • Bernard Monsarrat
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, UMR 5089Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Université Paul SabatierToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Pole protéomique, Plateforme Génomique FonctionelleUniversité V. Ségalen BordeauxBordeauxFrance
  3. 3.Plate-forme protéomique IFR-100Etablissement Français du SangDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations