Quantification of Proteins and Metabolites by Mass Spectrometry Without Isotopic Labeling

  • Sushmita Mimi Roy
  • Christopher H. Becker
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 359)


We demonstrate the quantification capability and robustness of a new integrated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) approach for large-scale profiling of proteins and metabolites. This approach to determine differential expression relies on linearity of signal vs molecular concentration using electrospray ionization LC-MS, reproducibility of sample processing, a novel normalization strategy and associated data analysis software. No isotopic tagging or spiking of internal standards is required. The method is general and applicable to the proteome and metabolome from all biological fluids and tissues. Small or large numbers of samples can be profiled in a single experiment. Differential profiling of 6000 molecular ions per sample by one-dimensional chromatography LC-MS and 30,000 molecular ions per sample by two-dimensional chromatography LC-MS is demonstrated using rheumatoid arthritis patient samples compared with control samples. A new approach to peptide identification is described that involves building libraries of previously identified peptides, circumventing the need to acquire MS/MS data during profiling. Robustness of the platform was tested by repeating sample preparation and LC-MS differential expression analysis after 10 mo, using independent serum aliquots stored at − 80°C. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of long-term robustness of a platform for quantitative proteomics and metabolomics.

Key Words

Proteomics metabolomics quantification quantitative mass spectrometry protein identification differential profiling differential expression 


  1. 1.
    Bodovitz, S. and Patterson, S. D. (2003) Protein biomarker strategies. Drug Discovery World Fall 2003, 67–78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rubenstein, K. (2003) Post-genomic biomarkers: revolutionizing drug development and diagnostics. D and MD Publications, Westborough, MA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, W., Zhou, H., Lin, H., et al. (2003) Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Anal. Chem. 75, 4818–4826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steen, H., Jebanathirajah, J. A., Springer, M., and Kirschner, M. W. (2005) Stable isotope-free relative and absolute quantitation of protein phosphorylation stoichiometry by MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3948–3953.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, N. L. and Anderson, N. G. (2003) The human plasma proteome: history, character and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adkins, J. N., Varnum, S. M., Auberry, K. J., et al. (2002) Toward a human blood serum proteome: Analysis by multidimensional separation coupled with mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 947–955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., and Aebersold, R. (1999) Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol. 17, 994–999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ji, J., Chakraborty, A., Geng, M., et al. (2000) Strategy for qualitative and quantitative analysis in proteomics based on signature peptides. J. Chromatogr. B 745, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goshe, M. B. and Smith, R. D. (2003) Stable isotope-coded proteomic mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 101–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M. W., and Gygi, S. P. (2003) Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12,6940–12,6945.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 4th Edition, HHS Publication No. (CDC) 93-8395.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hastings C. A., Norton, S. M., and Roy, S. (2002) New algorithms for processing and peak detection in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data. Rapid Commun. Mass Specrom. 16, 462–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderle, M., Roy, S., Lin, H., Becker, C., and Joho, K. (2004) Quantifying reproducibility for differential proteomics: noise analysis for protein liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in human serum. Bioinformatics 20, 183,575–183,582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roy, S., Anderle, M., Lin, H., and Becker, C. (2004) Differential expression profiling of serum proteins and metabolites for Biomarker Discovery. Int. J Mass Spec. 238, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rabiner, L. and Juang, B.-H. (1993) Fundamentals of Speech Recognition, Prentice-Hall Publishers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glantz, S. A. (1997) Primer of Biostatistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carr, S., Aebersold, R., Baldwin, M., Burlingame, A., Clauser, K., and Nesvizhskii, A. (2004) The need for guidelines in publication of peptide and protein identification data: working group on publication guidelines for peptide and protein identification data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 531–533.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sushmita Mimi Roy
    • 1
  • Christopher H. Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomarker Discovery Sciences, PPD, Inc.Menlo Park

Personalised recommendations