Recombination Detection and Analysis Using RDP3

  • Darren P. Martin
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 537)


Recombination between nucleotide sequences is a major process influencing the evolution of most species on Earth. While its evolutionary value is a matter of quite intense debate, so too is the influence of recombination on evolutionary analysis methods that assume nucleotide sequences replicate without recombining. The crux of the problem is that when nucleic acids recombine, the daughter or recombinant molecules no longer have a single evolutionary history. All analysis methods that derive increased power from correctly inferring evolutionary relationships between sequences will therefore be at least mildly sensitive to the effects of recombination. The importance of considering recombination in evolutionary studies is underlined by the bewildering array of currently available methods and software tools for analysing and characterising it in various classes of nucleotide sequence datasets. Here we will examine the use of some of these tools to derive and test recombination hypotheses for datasets containing a moderate degree of nucleotide sequence diversity.

Key words

Recombination gene conversion breakpoints phylogenetic trees RDP3 


  1. 1.
    Martin, D. P., Williamson, C., and Posada, D. (2005) RDP2: recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 21, 260–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin, D., and Rybicki, E. (2000) RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics 16, 562–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Padidam, M., Sawyer, S., and Fauquet, C. M. (1999) Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology 265, 218–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maynard-Smith, J. (1992) Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol 34, 126–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Posada, D., and Crandall, K. A. (2001) Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 13757–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin, D. P., Posada, D., Crandall, K. A., and Williamson, C. (2005) A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 21, 98–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boni M. F., Posada, D., and Feldman, M. W. (2007) An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics 176, 1035–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibbs, M. J., Armstrong, J. S., and Gibbs, A. J. (2000) Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics 16, 573–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holmes, E. C., Worobey, M., and Rambaut, A. (1999) Phylogenetic evidence for recombination in dengue virus. Mol Biol Evol 16, 405–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Felsenstein, J. (1989) PHYLIP – Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5, 164–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guindon, S., and Gascuel, O. (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52, 696–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiller, G. F. (1998) Phylogenetic profiles: a graphical method for detecting genetic recombinations in homologous sequences. Mol Biol Evol 15, 326–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGuire, G., and Wright, F. (2000) TOPAL 2.0: improved detection of mosaic sequences within multiple alignments. Bioinformatics 16, 130–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren P. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular MedicineUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations