Quantitative Protein Profiling by Mass Spectrometry Using Label-Free Proteomics

  • Arsalan S. Haqqani
  • John F. Kelly
  • Danica B. Stanimirovic
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 439)


“Gel-free,” or mass spectrometry (MS)-based, proteomics techniques are emerging as the methods of choice for quantitatively comparing proteins levels among biological proteomes, since they are more sensitive and reproducible than two dimensional gel (2-DE)-based methods. Currently, the MS-based methods utilize mainly stable isotope labels (e.g., ICAT®, iTRAQ™) that enable easy identification of differentially expressed proteins in two or more samples. “Label-free” MS-based methods would alleviate several limitations of the labeling methods, provided that relative quantitative profiling of proteins among multiple MS runs is achievable. However, comparisons of multiple MS runs of highly complex biological samples are very challenging and time consuming. To alleviate this problem, several laboratories and MS vendors have developed software for computer-assisted comparisons of multiple label-free MS runs to allow profiling of differentially expressed proteins. In this chapter, we describe the use of custom-developed MatchRx software in quantitative comparison of multiple label-free MS runs. We also describe details of sample preparation, fractionation, statistical analysis, and protein database searching for label-free comparative quantitative proteomics, as well as the application of a “targeted” MS approach, which includes quantification of the samples using MS followed by selective identification of only the differentially expressed peptides using tandem MS (MS/MS).


label-free quantitative protein profiling tandem mass spectrometry 


  1. 1.
    1. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R (1999) Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 17:994–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    2. Haqqani AS, Nesic M, Preston E, Baumann E, Kelly J, Stanimirovic D (2005) Characterisation of vascular protein expression patterns in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion using laser capture microdissection and ICAT-nanoLC-MS/MS. FASEB J 19:1809–1821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    3. Haqqani AS, Kelly J, Baumann E, Haseloff RF, Blasig IE, Stanimirovic DB (2007) Protein markers of ischemic insult in brain endothelial cells identified using 2D gel electrophoresis and ICAT-based quantitative proteomics. J Proteome Res 6:226–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    4. Haqqani AS, Hutchison JS, Ward R, Stanimirovic DB (2007) Protein biomarkers in serum of pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury identified by ICAT-LC-MS/MS. J Neurotrauma 24:54–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    5. Aebersold R, Mann M (2003) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422:198–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    6. Li XJ, Yi EC, Kemp CJ, Zhang H, Aebersold R (2005) A software suite for the generation and comparison of peptide arrays from sets of data collected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 4:1328–1340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    7. Ono M, Shitashige M, Honda K, Isobe T, Kuwabara H, Matsuzuki H et al (2006) Label-free quantitative proteomics using large peptide data sets generated by nanoflow liquid chromatog-raphy and mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 5:1338–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    8. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5116–5121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arsalan S. Haqqani
    • 1
  • John F. Kelly
    • 1
  • Danica B. Stanimirovic
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Biological SciencesNational Research CouncilOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations