Advertisement

Solution to Dark Matter Identified by Mass-Tolerant Database Search

  • Rune Matthiesen
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2051)

Abstract

Recently a mass-tolerant search approach was proposed which suggested novel types of abundant modification with delta masses that left many scratching their heads. These surprising new findings which were hard to explain were later referred to as dark matter of mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Rewards were promised for those who could solve these intriguing new findings. We propose here simple solutions to the novel delta masses identified by mass-tolerant database search.

Key words

Open search Validation Database-dependent search Peptide assignments 

Notes

Acknowledgments

R.M. is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT investigator program 2012). iNOVA4Health—UID/Multi/04462/2013, a program financially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia/Ministério da Educação e Ciência, through national funds and cofunded by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement is acknowledged. This work is also funded by FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 Programme and National Funds through FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the projects number PTDC/BTM-TEC/30087/2017 and PTDC/BTM-TEC/30088/2017

References

  1. 1.
    Chick JM, Kolippakkam D, Nusinow DP, Zhai B, Rad R, Huttlin EL, Gygi SP (2015) A mass-tolerant database search identifies a large proportion of unassigned spectra in shotgun proteomics as modified peptides. Nat Biotechnol 33(7):743–749.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsur D, Tanner S, Zandi E, Bafna V, Pevzner PA (2005) Identification of post-translational modifications by blind search of mass spectra. Nat Biotechnol 23(12):1562–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig R, Beavis RC (2004) TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20(9):1466–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matthiesen R, Trelle MB, Hojrup P, Bunkenborg J, Jensen ON (2005) VEMS 3.0: algorithms and computational tools for tandem mass spectrometry based identification of post-translational modifications in proteins. J Proteome Res 4(6):2338–2347.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr050264qCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carvalho AS, Ribeiro H, Voabil P, Penque D, Jensen ON, Molina H, Matthiesen R (2014) Global mass spectrometry and transcriptomics array based drug profiling provides novel insight into glucosamine induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(12):3294–3307.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.034363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spivak M, Weston J, Bottou L, Kall L, Noble WS (2009) Improvements to the percolator algorithm for Peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets. J Proteome Res 8(7):3737–3745.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr801109kCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    He L, Diedrich J, Chu YY, Yates JR (2015) Extracting accurate precursor information for tandem mass spectra by rawconverter. Anal Chem 87:11361–11367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ternent T, Csordas A, Qi D, Gomez-Baena G, Beynon RJ, Jones AR, Hermjakob H, Vizcaino JA (2014) How to submit MS proteomics data to ProteomeXchange via the PRIDE database. Proteomics 14(20):2233–2241.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201400120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rune Matthiesen
    • 1
  1. 1.Computational and Experimental Biology Group, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências MédicasUniversidade NOVA de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations