Advertisement

Experimental Setup and Data Analysis Considerations for DNA- and RNA-SIP Experiments in the Omics Era

  • Roey AngelEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2046)

Abstract

Careful and thoughtful experimental design is crucial to the success of any SIP experiment. This chapter discusses the essential aspects of designing a SIP experiment, focusing primarily on DNA- and RNA-SIP. The design aspects discussed here begin with considerations for carrying out the incubation, such as, the effect of choosing different stable isotopes and target biomolecules, to what degree should a labeled substrate be enriched, what concentration to use, and how long should the incubation take. Then tips and pitfalls in the technical execution of SIP are listed, including how much nucleic acids should be loaded, how many fractions to collect, and what centrifuge rotor to use. Lastly, a brief overview of the current methods for analyzing SIP data is presented, focusing on high-throughput amplicon sequencing, together with a discussion on how the choice of analysis method might affect the experimental design.

Key words

DNA-SIP RNA-SIP Amplicon sequencing Omics Network analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The manuscript for this chapter was written online using authors. R.A. was supported by BC CAS, ISB & SoWa RI (MEYS; projects LM2015075, EF16_013/0001782—SoWa Ecosystems Research).

References

  1. 1.
    Birnie GD, Rickwood D (1978) Isopycnic centrifugation in ionic media. In: Birnie GD, Rickwood D (eds) Centrifugal separations: molecular and cell biology. Butterworth, Boston, pp 169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angel R, Panhölzl C, Gabriel R et al (2018) Application of stable-isotope labelling techniques for the detection of active diazotrophs. Environ Microbiol 20:44–61.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13954CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lueders T, Manefield M, Friedrich MW (2004) Enhanced sensitivity of DNA- and rRNA-based stable isotope probing by fractionation and quantitative analysis of isopycnic centrifugation gradients. Environ Microbiol 6:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00536.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meselson M, Stahl FW (1958) The replication of DNA in Escherichia coli. Proc Nat Acad Sci 44:671–682.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.44.7.671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rolfe R, Meselson M (1959) The relative homogeneity of microbial DNA. Proc Nat Acad Sci 45:1039–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.45.7.1039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cupples AM, Shaffer EA, Chee-Sanford JC, Sims GK (2007) DNA buoyant density shifts during 15N-DNA stable isotope probing. Microbiol Res 162:328–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.01.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Youngblut ND, Buckley DH (2014) Intra-genomic variation in G+C content and its implications for DNA stable isotope probing. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:767–775.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cadisch G, Espana M, Causey R et al (2005) Technical considerations for the use of 15N-DNA stable-isotope probing for functional microbial activity in soils. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:1424–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aanderud ZT, Lennon JT (2011) Validation of heavy-water stable isotope probing for the characterization of rapidly responding soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4589–4596.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02735-10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Angel R, Conrad R (2013) Elucidating the microbial resuscitation cascade in biological soil crusts following a simulated rain event. Environ Microbiol 15:2799–2815.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berry D, Mader E, Lee TK et al (2014) Tracking heavy water (D2O) incorporation for identifying and sorting active microbial cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci 112:E194–E203.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420406112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baran R, Lau R, Bowen BP et al (2017) Extensive turnover of compatible solutes in cyanobacteria revealed by deuterium oxide (D2O) stable isotope probing. ACS Chem Biol 12:674–681.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.6b00890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manefield M, Whiteley AS, Ostle N et al (2002) Technical considerations for RNA-based stable isotope probing: an approach to associating microbial diversity with microbial community function. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 16:2179–2183.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blazewicz SJ, Schwartz E (2011) Dynamics of 18O incorporation from H218O into soil microbial DNA. Microb Ecol 61:911–916.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9826-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Radajewski S, Ineson P, Parekh NR, Murrell JC (2000) Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology. Nature 403:646–649.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35001054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boschker HTS, Nold SC, Wellsbury P et al (1998) Direct linking of microbial populations to specific biogeochemical processes by 13C-labeling of biomarkers. Nature 392:801–805.  https://doi.org/10.1038/33900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pelz O, Chatzinotas A, Zarda-Hess A et al (2001) Tracing toluene-assimilating sulfate-reducing bacteria using 13C-incorporation in fatty acids and whole-cell hybridization. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 38:123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00890.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knief C, Lipski A, Dunfield PF (2003) Diversity and activity of methanotrophic bacteria in different upland soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6703–6714.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.11.6703-6714.2003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Evershed RP, Crossman ZM, Bull ID et al (2006) 13C-labeling of lipids to investigate microbial communities in the environment. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:72–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2006.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jehmlich N, Schmidt F, Hartwich M et al (2008) Incorporation of carbon and nitrogen atoms into proteins measured by protein-based stable isotope probing (Protein-SIP). Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 22:2889–2897.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li T, Wu T-D, Mazéas L et al (2008) Simultaneous analysis of microbial identity and function using NanoSIMS. Environ Microbiol 10:580–588.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01478.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang Y, Huang WE, Cui L, Wagner M (2016) Single cell stable isotope probing in microbiology using Raman microspectroscopy. Curr Opin Biotechnol 41:34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.04.018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blazewicz SJ, Schwartz E, Firestone MK (2014) Growth and death of bacteria and fungi underlie rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses from seasonally dried soil. Ecology 95:1162–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1031.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buckley DH, Huangyutitham V, Hsu S-F, Nelson TA (2007) Stable isotope probing with 15N2 reveals novel noncultivated diazotrophs in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3196–3204.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02610-06CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pepe-Ranney C, Koechli C, Potrafka R et al (2015) Non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs mediate dinitrogen fixation in biological soil crusts during early crust formation. ISME J 10:287–298.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buckley DH, Huangyutitham V, Hsu S-F, Nelson TA (2007) Stable isotope probing with 15N achieved by disentangling the effects of genome G+C content and isotope enrichment on DNA density. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3189–3195.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02609-06CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McDonald IR, Radajewski S, Murrell JC (2005) Stable isotope probing of nucleic acids in methanotrophs and methylotrophs: a review. Org Geochem 36:779–787.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adam B, Klawonn I, Svedén JB et al (2015) N2-fixation ammonium release and N-transfer to the microbial and classical food web within a plankton community. ISME J 10:450–459.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    DeRito CM, Pumphrey GM, Madsen EL (2005) Use of field-based stable isotope probing to identify adapted populations and track carbon flow through a phenol-degrading soil microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7858–7865.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.12.7858-7865.2005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pepe-Ranney C, Campbell AN, Koechli CN et al (2016) Unearthing the ecology of soil microorganisms using a high resolution DNA-SIP approach to explore cellulose and xylose metabolism in soil. Front Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00703
  31. 31.
    Lueders T, Manefield M, Friedrich MW (2003) Enhanced sensitivity of DNA- and rRNA-based stable isotope probing by fractionation and quantitative analysis of isopycnic centrifugation gradients. Environ Microbiol 6:73–78.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00536.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen Y, Dumont MG, Neufeld JD et al (2008) Revealing the uncultivated majority: combining DNA stable-isotope probing multiple displacement amplification and metagenomic analyses of uncultivated Methylocystis in acidic peatlands. Environ Microbiol 10:2609–2622.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01683.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dumont MG, Pommerenke B, Casper P (2013) Using stable isotope probing to obtain a targeted metatranscriptome of aerobic methanotrophs in lake sediment. Environmental Microbiology Reports 13, 757–764. WileyGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Youngblut ND, Barnett SE, Buckley DH (2018) SIPSim: a modeling toolkit to predict accuracy and aid design of DNA-SIP experiments. Front Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00570
  35. 35.
    Xia W, Zhang C, Zeng X et al (2011) Autotrophic growth of nitrifying community in an agricultural soil. ISME J 5:1226–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee TK, Lee J, Sul WJ et al (2011) Novel biphenyl-oxidizing bacteria and dioxygenase genes from a Korean tidal mudflat. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3888–3891.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00023-11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pilloni G, von NF, Engel M, Lueders T (2011) Electron acceptor-dependent identification of key anaerobic toluene degraders at a tar-oil-contaminated aquifer by Pyro-SIP. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:165–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01083.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zemb O, Lee M, Gutierrez-Zamora ML et al (2012) Improvement of RNA-SIP by pyrosequencing to identify putative 4-n-nonylphenol degraders in activated sludge. Water Res 46:601–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zumsteg A, Schmutz S, Frey B (2013) Identification of biomass utilizing bacteria in a carbon-depleted glacier forefield soil by the use of 13C DNA stable isotope probing. Environ Microbiol Rep 5:424–437.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2014) Waste not want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comp Biol 10:e1003531.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Faust K, Raes J (2012) Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:538–550.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weiss S, Xu ZZ, Peddada S et al (2017) Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics. Microbiome.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y
  43. 43.
    Youngblut ND, Barnett SE, Buckley DH (2018) HTSSIP: an R package for analysis of high throughput sequencing data from nucleic acid stable isotope probing (SIP) experiments. PLoS One 13:e0189616.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189616CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Daebeler A, Bodelier PLE, Yan Z et al (2014) Interactions between Thaumarchaea Nitrospira and methanotrophs modulate autotrophic nitrification in volcanic grassland soil. ISME J 8:2397–2410.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ho A, Angel R, Veraart AJ et al (2016) Biotic interactions in microbial communities as modulators of biogeochemical processes: methanotrophy as a model system. Front Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01285
  46. 46.
    Berry D, Widder S (2014) Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Front Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil and Water Research Infrastructure and Institute of Soil BiologyBiology Centre CASČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations