Capture-based enrichment techniques have revolutionized genomic analysis of species and populations for which only low-quality or contaminated DNA samples (e.g., ancient DNA, noninvasively collected DNA, environmental DNA) are available. This chapter outlines an optimized laboratory protocol for generating RNA “baits” for genome-wide capture of target DNA from a larger pool of DNA. This method relies on the in vitro transcription of biotinylated RNA baits, which has the dual benefit of eliminating the high cost of synthesizing custom baits and producing a bait set that targets the majority of regions genome-wide. We provide a detailed protocol for the three main steps involved in bait library construction: (1) making a DNA library from a high-quality DNA sample for the organism of interest or a closely related species; (2) using duplex-specific nuclease digestion to reduce the representation of repetitive regions in the DNA library; and (3) performing in vitro transcription of the repetitive region-depleted DNA library to generate biotinylated RNA baits. Where applicable, we include notes and recommendations based on our own experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants DEB-1405308 (to J.T.) and SMA-1306134 (to J.T. and N.S.M.). We thank Jacob Gordon, Amanda Shaver, and Michael Yuan for key contributions to the protocol design and optimization and Arielle Fogel and Jen Tinsman for comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.
Green RE, Krause J, Briggs AW et al (2010) A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328(5979):710–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer S, Renaud G, Viola B et al (2015) Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences from two Denisovan individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(51):15696–15700PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Reich D, Green RE, Kircher M et al (2010) Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova cave in Siberia. Nature 468(7327):1053–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder H, Avila-Arcos MC, Malaspinas AS et al (2015) Genome-wide ancestry of 17th-century enslaved Africans from the Caribbean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(12):3669–3673PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Miller W, Drautz DI, Ratan A et al (2008) Sequencing the nuclear genome of the extinct woolly mammoth. Nature 456(7220):387–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder-Mackler N, Majoros WH, Yuan ML et al (2016) Efficient genome-wide sequencing and low coverage pedigree analysis from non-invasively collected samples. Genetics 203(2):699–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter ML, Buenrostro JD, Valdiosera C et al (2013) Pulling out the 1%: whole-genome capture for the targeted enrichment of ancient DNA sequencing libraries. Am J Hum Genet 93:852–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnirke A, Melnikov A, Maguire J et al (2009) Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 27:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ávila-Arcos MC, Sandoval-Velasco M, Schroeder H et al (2015) Comparative performance of two whole genome capture methodologies on ancient DNA Illumina libraries. Methods Ecol Evol 6(6):725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry GH, Marioni JC, Melsted P et al (2010) Genomic-scale capture and sequencing of endogenous DNA from feces. Mol Ecol 19:5332–5344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallender EJ (2011) Expanding whole exome resequencing into non-human primates. Genome Biol 12(9):R87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enk JM, Devault AM, Kuch M et al (2014) Ancient whole genome enrichment using baits built from modern DNA. Mol Biol Evol 31:1292–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar