Skip to main content

Quantitating Ligand Bias Using the Competitive Model of Ligand Activity

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Beta-Arrestins

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1957))

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can interact with both G proteins and β-arrestin proteins to propagate different signaling outputs. In some contexts, agonists may drive the receptor to preferentially engage one of these effectors over the other. Such “ligand bias” may present a means to impart pathway-selective signaling downstream of this class of receptors. In cases where physiological responses are mediated by diverse pathways, this could, in part, provide a means to refine GPCR therapeutics. Cell-based signaling assays are used to measure the potential for signaling bias in vitro, and these measures take into account potency, efficacy, and the overall capacity of the assay. However, narrow assay windows sometimes limit the confidence in estimating agonist activity, if a compound performs as a very weakly efficacious partial agonist. This lack of response in an assay hampers the ability to measure and compare potencies, and the degree of separation of an agonist’s performance, between two assays. In this chapter, we describe in detail a method for the estimation of the relative activity of a partial agonist and provide a stepwise protocol for calculating bias when this case arises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeWire SM, Seungkirl A, Lefkowitz RJ, Shenoy SK (2007) β-Arrestins and cell signaling. Annu Rev Physiol 69:483–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ehlert FJ (2007) On the analysis of ligand directed signaling at G protein coupled receptors. NS Arch Pharmacol 377:549–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehlert FJ, Griffin MT, Suga H (2011) Analysis of functional responses at G protein-coupled receptors: estimation of relative affinity constants for the inactive receptor state. JPET 338(2):658–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kenakin T, Watson C, Muniz-Medina V, Christopoulos A, Novick S (2012) A simple method for quantifying functional selectivity and agonist Bias. ACS Chem Neurosci 3(3):193–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arunlakshana O, Schild HO (1959) Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists. Br J Pharmacol 48(14):48–58

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaddum JH (1937) The quantitative effects of antagonistic drugs. J Physiol 89:7P–9P

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barlow RB, Scott NC, Stephenson RP (1967) The affinity and efficacy of onium salts on the frog rectus abdominis. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 31(1):188–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Black JW, Leff P (1983) Operational models of pharmacological agonism. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 220(1219):141–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stahl EL, Zhou L, Ehlert FJ, Bohn LM (2015) A novel method for analyzing extremely biased agonism at G protein–coupled receptors. Mol Pharmacol 87(5):866–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Westhuizen ET, Breton B, Christopoulos A, Bouvier M (2014) Quantification of ligand bias for clinically relevant beta2-adrenergic receptor ligands: implications for drug taxonomy. Mol Pharmacol 85(3):492–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. “Entering a user-defined model into Prism.” GraphPad Software, Inc. http://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/curve-fitting/index.htm?reg_writing_models.htm. Accessed 1 May 2016.

  12. Kenakin T, Christopoulos A (2013) Signalling bias in new drug discovery: detection, quantification and therapeutic impact. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12(3):205–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luttrell L, Kenakin T (2011) Refining efficacy: allosterism and bias in G protein-coupled receptor signaling. In: Luttrell L, Fergson S (eds) Signal transduction protocols, methods in molecular biology, vol vol. 756. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura M. Bohn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Stahl, E.L., Ehlert, F.J., Bohn, L.M. (2019). Quantitating Ligand Bias Using the Competitive Model of Ligand Activity. In: Scott, M., Laporte, S. (eds) Beta-Arrestins. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1957. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9158-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9158-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9157-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9158-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics