Advertisement

Induction of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Long-Term Depression in the Hippocampal Schaffer Collateral Pathway of Aging Rats

  • Kirstan E. Gimse
  • Kenneth O’Riordan
  • Corinna BurgerEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1941)

Abstract

Scientific progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of aging in the brain is essential for the identification of novel targets for the treatment and prevention of age-associated cognitive disorders. Electrophysiological analysis of synaptic plasticity using extracellular field recordings in rodent hippocampal slices is a well-established method for investigating molecular mechanisms of learning and memory. These methods can be applied to the study of aging in the brain by utilizing hippocampal slices from aged animals. However, this application can be challenging as it is difficult to ensure and maintain the health of slices originating from aged animals. The technique described in this chapter outlines the procedure for measuring metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated long-term depression in hippocampal slices using extracellular field recordings and includes specific details for the application of this technique in the study of neuronal aging.

Key words

Metabotropic glutamate receptors Long-term depression Aging Hippocampus Synaptic plasticity Field recordings 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH R01AG048172-03 and NIH T32 GM081061 to Kirstan Gimse.

References

  1. 1.
    Aarli JA, Dua T, Janca A, Muscetta A (2006) Neurological disorders: public health challenges. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 177–182Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gage FH, Dunnett SB, Bjorklund A (1984) Spatial learning and motor deficits in aged rats. Neurobiol Aging 5:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gage FH, Bjorklund A (1986) Cholinergic septal grafts into the hippocampal formation improve spatial learning and memory in aged rats by an atropine-sensitive mechanism. J Neurosci 6:2837–2847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markowska AL et al (1989) Individual differences in aging: behavioral and neurobiological correlates. Neurobiol Aging 10:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallagher M, Burwell R, Burchinal M (1993) Severity of spatial learning impairment in aging: development of a learning index for performance in the Morris water maze. Behav Neurosci 107:618–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerstein H, Hullinger R, Lindstrom MJ, Burger C (2013) A behavioral paradigm to evaluate hippocampal performance in aged rodents for pharmacological and genetic target validation. PLoS One 8:e62360.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062360 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flicker C, Bartus RT, Crook TH, Ferris SH (1984) Effects of aging and dementia upon recent visuospatial memory. Neurobiol Aging 5:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perlmutter M, Metzger R, Nezworski T, Miller K (1981) Spatial and temporal memory in 20 to 60 year olds. J Gerontol 36:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharps MJ, Gollin ES (1987) Memory for object locations in young and elderly adults. J Gerontol 42:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barnes CA, Nadel L, Honig WK (1980) Spatial memory deficit in senescent rats. Can J Psychol 34:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wallace JE, Krauter EE, Campbell BA (1980) Animal models of declining memory in the aged: short-term and spatial memory in the aged rat. J Gerontol 35:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rapp PR, Rosenberg RA, Gallagher M (1987) An evaluation of spatial information processing in aged rats. Behav Neurosci 101:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morris RG, Garrud P, Rawlins JN, O'Keefe J (1982) Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hullinger R, O'Riordan K, Burger C (2015) Environmental enrichment improves learning and memory and long-term potentiation in young adult rats through a mechanism requiring mGluR5 signaling and sustained activation of p70s6k. Neurobiol Learn Mem 125:126–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2015.08.006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cortese GP, Olin A, O'Riordan K, Hullinger R, Burger C (2018) Environmental enrichment improves hippocampal function in aged rats by enhancing learning and memory, LTP, and mGluR5-Homer1c activity. Neurobiol Aging 63:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.11.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ayala JE et al (2009) mGluR5 positive allosteric modulators facilitate both hippocampal LTP and LTD and enhance spatial learning. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:2057–2071.  https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.30 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Balschun D et al (1999) A specific role for group I mGluRs in hippocampal LTP and hippocampus-dependent spatial learning. Learn Mem 6:138–152PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goh JJ, Manahan-Vaughan D (2013) Spatial object recognition enables endogenous LTD that curtails LTP in the mouse hippocampus. Cereb Cortex 23:1118–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs089 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang S et al (2013) Integrity of mGluR-LTD in the associative/commissural inputs to CA3 correlates with successful aging in rats. J Neurosci 33:12670–12678.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1086-13.2013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar A (2011) Long-term potentiation at CA3-CA1 hippocampal synapses with special emphasis on aging, disease, and stress. Front Aging Neurosci 3:7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2011.00007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bachevalier J, Nemanic S (2008) Memory for spatial location and object-place associations are differently processed by the hippocampal formation, parahippocampal areas TH/TF and perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus 18:64–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20369 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neyman S, Manahan-Vaughan D (2008) Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) and 5 (mGluR5) regulate late phases of LTP and LTD in the hippocampal CA1 region in vitro. Eur J Neurosci 27:1345–1352.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06109.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huber KM, Kayser MS, Bear MF (2000) Role for rapid dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal mGluR-dependent long-term depression. Science 288:1254–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luscher C, Huber KM (2010) Group 1 mGluR-dependent synaptic long-term depression: mechanisms and implications for circuitry and disease. Neuron 65:445–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gimse K et al (2018) Hippocampal Homer1b/c is necessary for contextual fear conditioning and group I metabotropic glutamate receptor mediated long-term depression. Neurobiol Learn Mem 156:17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirstan E. Gimse
    • 1
  • Kenneth O’Riordan
    • 2
  • Corinna Burger
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Cellular and Molecular Pathology Graduate ProgramUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.APC Microbiome IrelandUniversity College CorkCorkUK
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations